Cases

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Charles Dent, Respondent-Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2021-001246 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Beaufort County Alex Kinlaw Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28172 Heard April 20, 2023 – Filed August 16, 2023 REVERSED AND REMANDED Attorney General Alan M

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Charles Dent, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2024-000355 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Beaufort County Alex Kinlaw Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28289 Heard April 23, 2025 – Filed Jul

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Charles Dent, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001257 Appeal From Beaufort County Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Circuit Court Judge, Opinion No. 6034 Submitted September 6, 2023 – Filed November 8, 2023 AF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Charles Dent, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001257 Appeal From Beaufort County Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5850 Heard February 11, 2021 – Filed August 18, 2021 REVERSED AND

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-1480 CRISTIN DENT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

248 S.W.3d 646 (2008) Gina M. DENT, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Charles W. DENT, Respondent/Appellant. No. ED 89444. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two. March 25, 2008. Terry Lee Jones, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. William E. Albrecht, Clayton, MO, for Respondent. *647 BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.

LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In this appeal, we must determine whether the chancellor erred in dismissing Albinnie Bryant's complaint against Katie Dent, Christopher Gray, and Cathy Gray. Finding reversible error regarding the applicable statute of limitations, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from the convictions of the defendants Charles Dent and Ivy Travis Tucker for being felons in knowing possession of a firearm in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g). Several eyidentiary issues are raised in addition to a challenge of the government’s recall of a witness at trial in response to notes from the jury before the close of eviden

I respectfully dissent from the denial of certiorari review. In order to explain my reasons for doing so, I will briefly set out the facts of this case. On September 22, 1995, officer B.C. Cooper of the Headland Police Department stopped James Henry Dent for speeding. After Mr. Dent gave consent, officers called to the scene searched his van, recovering approximately 5.5 grams of marijuana. Dent subsequently pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor possession charge; he was given a 12-m

914 F.Supp. 1462 (1996) Christopher A. ESTEP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. James DENT, et al., Defendants. Ronald Timothy PHIPPS, Plaintiff, v. Philip PARKER, et al., Defendants. Troy BERRY, Plaintiff, v. Phil PARKER, et al., Defendants. Charles Douglas INGRAM, Sr., a/k/a Muhammad Thabit Rashad, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gregg W. ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. Cholly B. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Glenn HAEBERLIN,

469 S.E.2d 311 (1996) 220 Ga. App. 147 DENT v. The STATE. No. A95A2049. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 9, 1996. Jeffrey S. Bowman, Augusta, for appellant. Daniel J. Craig, District Attorney, Charles R. Sheppard, Assistant District Attorney, Augusta, for appellee. McMURRAY, Presiding Judge. Defendant Willie Emerson

In re Dent, Edward Charles; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D,” No. 7-89-0659; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89 1800. Denied. Relator’s request for release pursuant to the provisions of La.C.Cr.P. *477art. 701 is moot as the bill of information was filed before a hearing was he

Holmes, J. This appeal presents two issues surrounding the Real Estate Recovery Fund, R.C. 4735.12. The first is whether either Dent or St. John obtained a final judgment against Gary Wolf in his capacity as a real estate broker on the grounds of conduct in violation of R.C. Chapter 4735. The second issue is whether their applications were timely filed, pursuant to R.C. 4735.12(B). We find that neither applicant obtained a final

57 B.R. 219 (1986) In re FRED DENT, INC. (EIN XX-XXXXXXX), Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 80-00059. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana. January 24, 1986. Louis Phillips, Baton Rouge, La., for Travelers Ins. Co. Erwin A. LaRose, Baton Rouge, La., trustee. *220 Charles N. Malone, Baton Rouge, La., for debtor. Gerar

GARRISON, Presiding Judge. Appellant, C.L.P., appeals from a “Finding Of Jurisdiction And Order Of Disposition” entered by the juvenile court on July 21, 1994. By that finding, the court ordered that Appellant’s daughter, K.L.B., who was then 10½ months old, be made a temporary ward of the Dent County Juvenile Court and that legal custody be placed with the Dent County, Missouri Division of Family Services (DFS).

Douglas, J., concurring. I concur with the majority opinion in its finding that the injured employee-appellee gave timely notice of her additional conditions claim. In so finding, the majority affirms the judgment of the court of appeals and, thereby, seems to reject the finding of the trial court that notice was also given within the required two-year period by the filing of a fee bill. I disagree with the majority in its ap

Opinion issued January 30, 2014 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-01043-CR ——————————— JONNIE DENT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Per Curiam. Appellant, in his first proposition of law, asks this court to adopt a rule of comparative negligence. This court, in Baab v. Shockling (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 55, 57, recently reaffirmed its decision not to judicially alter the law in this area and held that any change in the law should emanate from the General Assembly.2 Accordingly, appellant’s first proposit

The defendant was indicted and convicted for robbery in the first degree. Alabama Code Section 13A-8-41 (1975). After proper proof of three prior felonies, he was sentenced as an habitual offender to life without parole. Four issues are presented on appeal. I The defendant had no constitutional right to counsel at a preindictment showup. Jackson v. State, 414 So.2d 1014,

MILLS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In September of 1997, Scruggs, Mil-lette, Bozeman & Dent, P.A. (“SMBD”) filed a lawsuit in the Jackson County Chancery Court against Merkel & Cocke, P.A. (“Merkel”), Charles Merkel, Cynthia Mitchell, William Roberts Wilson, Jr., P.A., and Asbestos Group, P.A. This lawsuit placed at issue the alleged mishandling of attorneys’ fees received by Merkel in 1994. These f