Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charles E., Jr. Stafford”
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2287 Doc: 39 Filed: 12/17/2024 Pg: 1 of 19 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2287 ROBERT E. STAFFORD, JR., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; MELISSA BONETTI, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated;
Charles v. Pippertpublic domain
By Judge James W. Haley, Jr. Where a court has affirmed, ratified, or incorporated by reference in a final divorce decree a property settlement agreement (PSA) which includes spousal support, Va. Code § 20-109.1 provides that: “Upon the remarriage of the spouse receiving support, spousal support shall terminate unless otherwise provided by stipulation or contract.” The issue in the instant case is whether parol evidence is ad
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-07-00862-CV TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Appellant v. Charles E. DURST, Jr., Appelle
Stafford v. Rocky Hollow Coal Co.public domain
482 S.E.2d 210 (1996) 198 W.Va. 593 James R. STAFFORD, Plaintiff Below, Appellee, v. ROCKY HOLLOW COAL COMPANY, a West Virginia Corporation; Rawl Sales & Processing Company, a West Virginia Corporation; A.T. Massey Company, a Virginia Corporation; and Larry Robinette, Defendants Below, Appellants. No. 23158. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
State v. Staffordpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Stafford, 2019-Ohio-3628.] COURT OF APPEALS ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Hon. Earle E.
Richard E. Riegel, Jr. v. Patricia A. Wilkersonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 22, 2014 Session RICHARD E. RIEGEL, JR. v. PATRICIA A. WILKERSON Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 69727 James F. Butler, Chancellor No. W2013-01391-COA-R3-CV - Filed February 11, 2014 This is an easement case in which the Appellant, the servient estate owner,
Billions v. White and Stafford Furniture Co.public domain
In January 1987 White and Stafford Furniture Co., Inc. (White and Stafford) filed a complaint in the District Court of Limestone County, Alabama, alleging that Dennis Billions was in default on a retail installment contract. The complaint alleged that the balance of the contract was $1,538.47 plus costs. Billions answered, admitting that he owed White and Stafford, but disputed the amount alleged in the complaint. Subsequently, Billions amended his answer to assert a countercla
Byron L. Jackson, Jr. v. Jay Howard Crippenpublic domain
01/24/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 4, 2018 Session BYRON L. JACKSON, JR. V. JAY HOWARD CRIPPEN ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 190047-2 Clarence E. Pridemore, Jr., Chancellor No. E2018-00850-COA-R3-CV At
Daniel Charles Mayfield, Jr. v. State of Texaspublic domain
Opinion filed May 7, 2009 Op
Rebecca Stafford Shell v. Jon E. Shellpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 22, 2008 Session REBECCA STAFFORD SHELL v. JON E. SHELL Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sevier County No. 04-10-528 Hon. Telford E. Forgety, Jr., Chancellor No. E2007-01209-COA-R3-CV - FILED JULY 9, 2008 The plaintiff wife filed a Complaint for Divorce. The parties en
Maranda ODonnell v. Harris County, Texas, epublic domain
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: *534 Maranda ODonnell and other plaintiffs (collectively, "ODonnell") brought a class action suit against Harris County, Texas, and a number of its officials-including County Judges, 1 Hearing O
Garrison v. St. Charles General Hospitalpublic domain
Ii ARMSTRONG, J. The dispositive issue of these consolidated writ applications is whether the trial court erred by ordering transfers to proper venues as opposed to dismissing for improper venue. We find the trial court did have authority to transfer rather than dismiss and did not abuse its discretion by doing so. This case has both plaintiff and defendant classes. The plaintiff class consists of persons
Garrison v. St. Charles General Hospitalpublic domain
1JOAN BERNARD ARMSTRONG, Judge. The sole issue presented to us in these consolidated writ applications is whether, as to certain defendants as to whom it has been determined that venue is improper, the case should be transferred to proper venues or, instead, dismissed without prejudice. This seemingly routine procedural issue is fraught with weighty substantive consequences because the present case involves alleged liability
Stafford, Curtis Roscoepublic domain
PD-1619-14 PD-1619-14 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 2/18/2015 11:03:35 AM Accepted 2/19/2015 10:30:32 AM NO. ___________________ ABEL ACOSTA
Michael James Milson Jr. v. the State of Texaspublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-21-00329-CR ________________ MICHAEL JAMES MILSON JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ___________________________________________
Willie Lockett, Jr. v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 41 Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV integrity of this document No. CR-21-409 2023.08.21 11:59:47 -05'00' 2023.003.20269 WILLIE LOCKETT, JR. Opinion Delivered February 2, 2022
In Re O.W., Jr.public domain
01/09/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 1, 2019 IN RE O.W., JR. ET AL. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Shelby County No. DD4263 Harold W. Horne, Special Judge ______
State ex rel. Stafford v. Industrial Commissionpublic domain
Per Curiam. For mandamus to issue, it must be demonstrated that: (1) the relator has a clear legal right to the relief requested; (2) respondents are under a clear legal duty to perform the *78acts requested; and (3) relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29, 6 OBR 50, 50-5
Amoco Chemicals Corp. v. Staffordpublic domain
OPINION A jury awarded the appellee $75,029 for injuries he sustained when struck by a truck driven by John Baker, in the course of his employment with Amoco Chemicals. The appellants stipulated to liability, and the trial was held solely to determine the amount of damages. The appellants complain of the court's exclusion of evidence concerning the appellee's alleged alcoholism and alcohol withdrawal. The trial court excluded evidence: 1. th
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00422-CV KODIAK PRODUCTS CO., INC. APPELLANT V. CHARLES H. DEEGEAR, JR. AND APPELLEES DEEMAXX COMPONENTS, INC. ---------- FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT C