Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charles F. Panos”
United States v. Panospublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Jennifer and James Panos pleaded guilty to a racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). They were charged with conspiring to operate a criminal enterprise, Desperado’s Gentlemen’s Cabaret, which was used for, inter alia, prostitution, and the distribution and use of controlled substances. Defendants were sentenced below the Sentencing Guidelines advisory se
Panos Trading LLC v. Forrerpublic domain
2023 IL App (1st) 220451 FIRST DISTRICT THIRD DIVISION March 29, 2023 No. 1-22-0451 PANOS TRADING LLC, ) Appeal from the )
Charles Muszynski v. Roberto Roman Valentinpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT _______________________________ BAP NO. PR 24-011 _______________________________ Bankruptcy Case No. 23-02870-MCF _______________________________ CHARLES MUSZYNSKI, Debtor
Panos v. Island Gem Enterprises, Ltd., NVpublic domain
880 F.Supp. 169 (1995) Constantine and Carla PANOS, Plaintiffs, v. ISLAND GEM ENTERPRISES, LTD., N.V., et al., Defendants. Robert WOHL and Aida Wohl, Plaintiffs, v. ISLAND GEM ENTERPRISES, LTD., N.V., et al., Defendants. Nos. 82 Civ. 4629 (SS), 83 Civ. 0969 (SS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 16, 1995. *
GULF COAST SHELL AND AGGREGATE LP v. Newlinpublic domain
623 F.3d 235 (2010) GULF COAST SHELL AND AGGREGATE LP; Richmond Material Company, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles T. NEWLIN, Individually, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, and Quimicos Amiex, S.A. de C.V., appearing solely in its capacity as a person who asserts a right of ownership interest in the Dredge La Concha, Claimant-Appellant, v. International Fidelity Insurance Co., Intervenor-Appellant. No. 09-40942.
Turek v. General Mills, Inc.public domain
662 F.3d 423 (2011) Carolyn TUREK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MILLS, INC. and Kellogg Co., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-3267. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 9, 2011. Decided October 17, 2011. *424 Ronald W. Teeple (argued), Attorney, Teeple, Leonard & Erdman, Chicago, I
Messina v. St. Charles Parish Councilpublic domain
| JAMES L. CANNELLA, Judge. This is an appeal by the Plaintiffs, Andrew Messina, Jr. (Messina) and D & G Productions, Inc. (D & G), from a summary judgment denying an outdoor liquor permit by the Defendant, the Parish of St. Charles (the Parish). We affirm. In April of 1994, D & G, through its President and owner, Messina, leased a building at 20 Avenue of the Oaks, Destre-han, Louisiana for the
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge This matter concerns the alleged misconduct of Defendant Kraft in purchasing and selling wheat and wheat futures. Plaintiff, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), brought this action pursuant to 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1, and alleges four causes of action: (I) use of a manipulative or deceptive device in connection with a co
In Re Iron Age Corp.public domain
378 B.R. 419 (2007) In re IRON AGE CORPORATION, Iron Age Canada Ltd., Debtors. Nos. 07-40217-JBR, 07-40219-JBR. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts. November 30, 2007. *420 Brendan C. Recupero, Kathleen Rahbany, Carl F. Barnes, Christopher J. Panos, Craig and Macauley, P.C., Gavin H. Finlayson, Bennett Jones, Toronto, ON, fo
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Robert Blakey, United States District Judge This matter concerns the alleged misconduct of Defendant Kraft in purchasing and selling wheat and wheat futures. On December 18, 2015, the Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss Counts I and II. [87]; Currently before the Court are two motions: (1) Defendants’ motion to certify issues for interlocutory appeal and to stay
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT SOMMA, Bankruptcy Judge. By his complaint in this adversary proceeding, Donald Lassman (“the Trustee”), as trustee in the Chapter 7 case of Charles River Press Lithography, Inc. (“the Debt- or”), asserts nine counts against Hollis Meddings Group, Inc. (“HMG”), a workout consultant whom the Debtor retained pr
Randolph v. J.M. Smucker Co.public domain
ORDER BETH BLOOM, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Melissa Leigh Randolph’s Motion to Certify Class, ECF No. [36], and Defendant J.M. Smucker Co.’s Motion to Strike New Evidence and Expert Report Submitted with Plaintiffs Reply Brief, ECF No. [60]. The Court has reviewed the motions, all supporting and opposing filings, and the record in this case, and is otherwise
PER CURIAM. The district court did not err in dismissing without an evidentiary hearing Owens’ petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The transcript of Owens’ arraignment in the California Superior Court, attached as an exhibit to appellees’ return to the order to show cause, clearly shows that, before pleading guilty to a charge of armed robbery, Owens knowingly and understandin
Foster v. Ghoshpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Court Judge Plaintiff Tony Foster filed suit against Defendants Dr. Parthasarathi Ghosh, Dr. Norman Patterson, Warden of Stateville Correctional Center Michael Lemke, and Sarah Johnson, a member of the Administrative Review Board (collectively, the “Defendants”). Foster alleges deprivation of his Eighth Amendment rights
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Christopher J. Panos, United States Bankruptcy Judge . Before the Court is the Motion.to Dismiss (the “Motion”) filed by Moog, Inc. (the “Defendant” or “Moog”), pursuant to which Moog seeks to dismiss. Counts I through XII of a seventeen-count complaint (the “Complaint”) brought by Joseph H. Baldiga (the “Trustee"), as Chapter 7 Trustee for the bankruptcy
In re Grove Instruments, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Christopher J. Panos, United States Bankruptcy Judge Upon consideration of the Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (Docket No. 109) (the “Motion”) filed by Janice Marsh, the chapter 7 trustee (the “Trustee”) of the estate of Grove Instruments, Inc. (the “Debtor” or the “Estate”), pursuant to which she seeks approval of the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (
Gorham v. General Growth Properties, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge. Ml four of these class actions against General Growth Properties, Inc. (“General Growth”) and a number of individuals are before this Court, one via an original random assignment and the other three by reassignment on relatedness grounds under this District Court’s LR 40.4. Because all four cases invoke the Private Securities
KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge. The appellants were convicted of conspiracy to violate the federal narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. § 174, after a five-week trial in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut before Judge Timbers and a jury. The three appellants, in addition to several other individuals, were named in a one-co
Jackson v. Colgate-Palmolive Companypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIAN JACKSON, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Doris Jackson, Deceased, Civil Action No. 15-01066 (TFH) Plaintiff, v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORA
In re Rumnock v. Anschutzpublic domain
JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 This original proceeding involves a discovery dispute between plaintiff Stephen Rumnoek and defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company (“American Family”). After being ordered to produce documents that Rumnoek had requested, American Family disclosed some of the documents but almost simultaneously moved for a protective order. The motion sought to