Cases

USCA11 Case: 18-14797 Date Filed: 03/12/2021 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14797 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cv-00381-WFJ-AAS BETTY M. SMITH, as

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. In this appeal four groups of prospective intervenors-the Arnett I, Arnett II, Charter Land Co. LLC, and Wyborny appellants-challenge the district court's 1 denials of their motions to intervene in a class action lawsuit by named plaintiff Connie Jean Smith against SEECO, Inc.,

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG NUMBER 13-11-00500-CV CHARLES E. SMITH AND BETTY M. SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES FOR THE SMITH FAMILY TRUST, Appellants, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, Appellee. NUMBER 13-11-00708-CV CHARLES E. SMITH AND BETTY M. SMITH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEES FOR THE SMI

OPINION Appellant, Lavelle Smith,1 was convicted of first degree aggravated assault of a peace officer upon his plea of not guilty to the trial court. The court found him guilty and, upon his plea of true to both the enhancement count and the habitual count, assessed his punishment at twenty-five years' confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. In a single point of error, A

131 F.3d 580w Richard C. BECHERER, et al., individually and on behalf ofall others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,J. Don Adams; Kay A. Arceneaux, as Executrix for the DonaldJ. Arceneaux, Sr. Estate; Edward R. Bassine; Anne T.Bassine; Thomas H. Blundell; Jan L. Blundell; James A.Campbell; Darrell R. Caudill; William A. Cherry;Catherine Crebbs, as General Partner of CCT & Co. asadministratrix of Estate of Rober

348 F.3d 177 William H. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 00-4030. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: September 18, 2002. Decided and Filed: October 28, 2003. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc: February 6, 2004. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206

OPINION PYLE, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE This case involves a dispute between neighbors — Betty J. Angel (“Angel”) and Kent H. Powelson (“Kent”) and Marjorie A. Powelson (“Marjorie”) (collectively, “the Powelsons”) — regarding two pieces of property in Vanderburgh County: (1) an 80-acre parcel of land, which was ow

Karen R. Baker, Justice, concurring in part and dissenting in part. By misinterpreting the General Assembly’s acts, the majority has judicially created a waiver of any and all sovereign immunity for the State under the Arkansas Whistle-Blower Act (AWBA). The majority also errs by failing to address an entire substantive claim on appeal, the denial of Smith’s motion for su

193 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 1999) RICHARD C. BECHERER, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,J. DON ADAMS; KAY A. ARCENEAUX, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE DONALD J. ARCENEAUX, SR. ESTATE; EDWARD R. BASSINE; ANNE T. BASSINE; THOMAS H. BLUNDELL; JAN L. BLUNDELL; JAMES A.CAMPBELL; DARRELL R. CAUDILL; WILLIAM A. CHERRY; CATHERINE CREBBS, AS GENERAL PARTNER OF CCT & CO. AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF ESTATE OF ROBERT W. CRE

MATHES, District Judge. Appellants, husband and wife, appeal from a judgment of the District Court decreeing foreclosure of appellee’s tax lien on real property situate in Erie County, Ohio, claimed by reason of assessments for appellant J. Robert D. Smith’s 1942 and 1943 income taxes. The land involved had been acquired by appellant Robert Smith, through inh

PER CURIAM. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and on the motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal, and was argued by counsel

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-00018-SCT LANIKIA SMITH, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, BETTIE SMITH; CAMILLE CARTER, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, LAREATHA CARTER; AMORY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AMORY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. CHARLES CLEMENT d/b/a M & W BUTANE GAS COMPANY, INC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/26/2005 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. PAUL S. FUNDERBURK COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge SCHROEDER; Special Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:1 This case, to which the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) does not apply, returns to us following remand to the Arizona state

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-00018-SCT LANIKIA SMITH, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, BETTIE SMITH; CAMILLE CARTER, BY HER NEXT FRIEND, LAREATHA CARTER; AMORY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND AMORY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES v. CHARLES CLEMENT d/b/a M & W BUTANE GAS COMPANY, INC. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/26/2005 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. PA

Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge: This case is one of dozens seeking to recover for harm allegedly resulting from a conspiracy among major banks to manipulate the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), a set of benchmark interest rates that affect financial transactions worth trillions of dollars. Plaintiffs-Appellants Charles Schwab Corporation, Charles Schwab Bank, N.A., Charles Sch

08/10/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 24, 2017 Session BETTY GRAHAM v. STACY LYNN ARCHER, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 14-C-1100 W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth, Judge ___________________________________

567 F.3d 246 (2009) Kenneth W. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 05-4211. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 10, 2009. Decided and Filed: June 5, 2009. *249 ARGUED: Kyle E. Timken, Law Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Charles L. Wille,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-CA-00045-SCT JOE M. BOWEN v. BETTY CAROL BOWEN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/07/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. SANFORD R. STECKLER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: CLEMENT S. BENVENUTTI ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: THOMAS WRIGHT TEEL NATURE OF THE CASE:

487 F.3d 423 Darryl M. DURR, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 00-3353. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 26, 2006. Decided and Filed: May 18, 2007. ARGUED: Kathleen A. McGarry, McGarry Law Office, Glorieta, New Mexico, for Ap

BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Chief Judge, dissenting. I join Judge Kennedy’s dissent. In the third opinion rendered by this Court in this case, I dissented from the panel’s decision, and I continue to remain convinced both that the Florida plaintiffs’ interests in the claims against Merrill Lynch were substantially identical to those of the Becherer plaintiffs, and that the Becherer plaintiffs adequately represented th