⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Charles Stewart Hollis”

State v. Stewartpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2009-04-15 · Published · cited 47× · 282 S.W.3d 729; 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 2597; 2009 WL 1024721
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 731 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 732 OPINION The district court granted appellee Trent Stewart a new trial in the
Comer v. Stewartpublic domain
District Court, D. Arizona · 2002-10-16 · Published · cited 18× · 230 F. Supp. 2d 1016; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21711; 2002 WL 31500937
230 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2002) Robert Charles COMER, Petitioner, v. Terry STEWART, et al., Respondents. No. CV-94-1469-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. October 16, 2002. *1017 Michael D. Kimerer, Holly R. Gieszl, Kimerer & Derrick PC, Phoenix, AZ, Peter James Eckerstrom, Denise I. Young, Julie Singleton Hall, Tuc
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-12-29 · Published · cited 2× · 471 F.3d 1359; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 32045
ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, 1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent ad
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2015-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
Ninth Court of Appeals BE IT REMEMBERED: THAT at the term of the Honorable Ninth Court of Appeals of the State of Texas, begun and holden at Beaumont on the 1st day of January, A.D. 2015, present, Chief Justice STEVE MCKEITHEN and Justices CHARLES KREGER, HOLLIS HORTON and LEANNE JOHNSON. “Pursuant to and in compliance with an Order of the Supreme Court of Texas, dated December 15, 2015, it is ordered that these causes be transferre
Hollis v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001-10-04 · Published · cited 36× · 55 S.W.3d 756; 346 Ark. 175; 2001 Ark. LEXIS 519
55 S.W.3d 756 (2001) 346 Ark. 175 Curtis Ray HOLLIS, v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 00-1276. Supreme Court of Arkansas. October 4, 2001. *757 William R. Simpson, Jr., Public Defender, by Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by Lauren Elizabeth Heil, Ass't Att'y
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
11/21/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 6, 2016 Session CHARLES GROGAN v. DANIEL UGGLA, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 2011-443 James G. Martin, III, Judge
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
11/21/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 6, 2016 Session CHARLES GROGAN v. DANIEL UGGLA, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 2011-443 James G. Martin, III, Judge
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-10-26 · Published · cited 7× · 229 So. 3d 480
Judge Max N. Tobias, Jr. hThe matter before us concerns three separate judgments and one motion that were consolidated on appeal. As such, each consolidated case presents distinct issues. After setting forth the facts, we discuss each case and its issues separately. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The Accident and Injuries On 1 July 2010, the plaintif
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-11-21 · Published · cited 3× · 535 S.W.3d 864
Roger A. Page, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C J., and Cornelia A. Clark, JJ. joined. Holly Kirby, J., filed a separate opinion concurring in part, dissenting in part. Sharon G. Lee, J., filed a dissenting opinion. In this case, the plaintiff Charles Grogan was injured when he fell from a sec
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-10-03 · Published · cited 1× · 905 F.3d 1222
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join the panel's opinion in full because our precedent in Basco v. Machin , 514 F.3d 1177 (11th Cir. 2008), requires us to vacate the summary judgment in favor of the Decatur Housing Authority. I write separately to explain why Basco is inconsistent with S
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019-01-28 · Published · cited 1× · 914 F.3d 1290
BY THE COURT: *1291A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986-12-22 · Published · cited 4× · 806 F.2d 991; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 35030
PER CURIAM: Appellant Joseph Eways appeals a default judgment against him. We reverse the district court’s award of $50,000.00 for bad faith damages. We vacate the district court’s award of $107,913.82 for litigation expenses to the extent that such award exceeds $54,711.57, and remand for a determination of whether litigation exp
State v. Casspublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009-08-19 · Published · cited 4× · 17 So. 3d 486; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1498; 2009 WL 2517090
17 So.3d 486 (2009) STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Applicant v. James L. CASS, Defendant-Respondent. No. 44,411-KW. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 19, 2009. *487 Charles Rex Scott, II, District Attorney, for Applicant. Damon Daniel Kervin, Jason Trevor Brown, Assistant District Attorneys, Anthony Holli
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 818 So. 2d 264; 2001 La.App. 4 Cir. 2356; 2002 La. App. LEXIS 1700
I PATRICIA RIVET MURRAY, Judge. This is a partition action. The narrow issue before us is whether a succession representative can sue to partition immovable property that the succession co-owns with a third party. From a judgment finding the succession representative lacks the right to bring such an action, the succession representative, Margie Stewart Williams, appeals. We reverse. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL
State v. Stewartpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004-01-27 · Published · cited 17× · 866 So. 2d 1016; 2004 WL 135317
866 So.2d 1016 (2004) STATE of Louisiana v. Charles STEWART. No. 03-KA-920. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. January 27, 2004. *1019 John M. Crum, Jr., District Attorney, Rodney A. Brignac, Assistant District Attorney, LaPlace, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, The State of Louisiana. Holli Herrle-Castillo, Marrero,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 20, 2014 Session ROBERT WALKER AND SUSAN ELDER1 v. CHARLES SMITH V. CLIFFORD BYRNE AND WIFE, CAROL BYRNE An Appeal from the Chancery Court for Marion County No. 7648 Jeffrey F. Stewart
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001-07-30 · Published · cited 0× · 259 F.3d 1295; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 16954
JORDAN, District Judge: When an action is removed from state court to federal court, it is removed to the district court “embracing the place where such action is pending.” 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). The question presented by this appeal is whether a defendant can obtain dismissal of a removed action on the ground that, when originally filed in state court, the action lacked proper
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 18, 2000 Session CHARLES W. SHOFFNER v. BILLY HARDWICK ENTERPRISES, INC. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 72085 T.D. George H. Brown, Jr., Judge No. W1999-01609-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 27, 2000 This is a slip and fall case. The plaintiff was injured while bow
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982-05-10 · Published · cited 97× · 675 F.2d 1174; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 19422; 10 Fed. R. Serv. 691
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Defendants Hill, Bosby and Ticey were indicted for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341, 1 *1178 and conspiracy to commit mail fraud, 18 U.S.C.A. § 371. 2 After a
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-09 · Published · cited 0×
SV.n: vr 'Te:x..-6 QIAp!BS k. !IJ\I.QUFFI JR. § AKA • CHART IE MUOQPF § v. § CASE NO. 03~13-00723-CR Ct+A~ A.. '(\1\A,t..<>oR"; J"f<. §