Cases

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 20, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00277-CR TIMOTHY CHARLES HILL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 176th District Court Harris County, Texas

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 11, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00602-CR ANDRE TIMOTHY JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 263rd District Court Harris County, Texas

185 P.3d 1188 (2008) Sara D. SPAIN, Petitioner, v. The EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT, Respondent. Kusum L. Batey, Respondent, and The Employment Security Department, Petitioner, and Snohomish County Center for Battered Women, Additional Party. Nos. 79878-8, 80309-9. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued February 26, 2008. Decided June 19, 20

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 20, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00339-CV JOSHUA BOYLE, RYAN PRATT, AND N-MOTION GROUP, LLC D/B/A N-MOTION TRANSPORT, Appellants V. KELLY DECARTERET, DECARTERET TRANSPORT, LLC, TIMOTHY ROUCH, Appellees On Appeal from

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Gulf Life Insurance Company and Timothy Webb. We affirm. On January 11, 1984, Gulf Life Insurance Company, through its agent Timothy Webb, sold an accident insurance policy to the plaintiff, William Coleman. On March 24 of the same year, Coleman had an accident and required emergency hospital care. As a result of the accident he incurred expenses of $100.00. On March 26, 1984, Coleman met with Webb in order t

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Majority Opinion and Dissenting Opinion filed August 15, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-24-00458-CR IN RE JONATHAN KNOX, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 179th District Court

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed, in part, and Denied, in part, and Memorandum Majority Opinion and Dissenting Opinion filed June 6, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00091-CR IN RE DARRELL WILLIAMS, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 174th District Court

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00681-CV THE TEXAS STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, Appellant v. Carol BIRCH, Charles Homer, Ann Landeros, and Carol Wood,

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Majority Opinion and Dissenting Opinion filed September 7, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00634-CR IN RE DAVID JOEL JOHNSON, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 263rd District Court Harris Cou

808 S.W.2d 809 (1991) Eloise PERKINS and Dennis Perkins, Appellants, v. NORTHEASTERN LOG HOMES; Roberts Consolidated Industries, Inc., and DAP, Inc., Appellees. No. 90-SC-738-CL. Supreme Court of Kentucky. May 9, 1991. *810 Gary M. Weiss, Weiss & Roseberry, Louisville, Richard S. McMillin, Timothy J. Cuddigan, Omaha, Neb., fo

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because the Court of Appeals correctly determined that the Simpson Circuit Court had jurisdiction over a contract dispute between the City of Franklin and the water district. The Public Service Commission has jurisdiction only over the rates and services of a “utility,” publicly or privately owned, as distinguished from city-own

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMMAD MOKHTAR AHMED, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 21-3333 (TJK) CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff’s pro se complaint sketches an opaque, dreamlike narrative that spans about twenty years of his life. It recoun

Stein, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Demurest, J.), entered July 3, 2012 in St. Lawrence County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10, for his discharge from confinement at a secure treatment facility. In 1984, petitioner was convicted of, among other things, sodomy in the first degree after he sexually assaulted two brothers, who w

Stein, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Demurest, J.), entered July 3, 2012 in St. Lawrence County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 10, for his discharge from confinement at a secure treatment facility. In 1984, petitioner was convicted of, among other things, sodomy in the first degree after he sexually assaulted two brothers, who w

MANNHEIMER, Judge, concurring. I write separately to address an issue that does not receive substantive discussion in the majority opinion: the question of whether it was error for Judge Card to voir dire the juror about her potential exposure to extrajudicial information about Collins's case without Collins being personally present. As explained in the majority opinion, Collins and his attorney

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed December 31, 2020. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-01041-CV FORT BEND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellant v. CHRISTOPHER MOORE, Appellee On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas

OPINION AND ORDER SMITH, Judge. Before the Court are Cross-Motions for Judgment on the Administrative Record. After full briefing, oral argument and careful consideration the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Charles J. Russell first started his service career in the United St

129 S.W.3d 810 (2004) In re AMFELS, INC. and U.S. Silica Company. In re Badger Mining Corporation. Nos. 13-04-064-CV, 13-04-068-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. March 16, 2004. *811 Chester J. Makowski, Keith N. Uhles, Royston Rayzor Vickery & Williams LLP, Henry S. Platts Jr., David E. Sharp, Beirne Maynar

FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Respondents appeal from a district court order granting Charles M. Siverson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his trial counsel’s absence from the courtroom during jury deliberations and the return of the verdicts at his trial deprived him of effective assistance of counsel in violation

RAU, J., I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE This case involves the constitutional question of whether a civil court may interfere with how a church chooses its priest. Specifically, Father Jeremy M. Warnick (appellant) sued All Saints Episcopal Church, Charles E. Bennison (the Episcopal Bishop of Pennsylvania), and three All Saints congregants, challenging Bishop Bennison’s decision to revoke his license to minister in P