Cases

MEMORANDUM RULING JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the court is a motion for summary judgment by Citgo Petroleum Corp. (“Citgo”) (R. #21) and a motion for summary judgment by Nick Kyle, Lake Charles Metal Trades Council, Local 407 International Union of Operating Engineers (“defendants”) (R. #22). For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment filed by Citgo w

599 So.2d 1058 (1992) Outher COLE, et al. v. CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al. Nos. 91-C-2531, 91-C-2539. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 28, 1992. Rehearing Denied June 30, 1992. *1059 William B. Baggett, William B. Baggett, Jr., and Rebecca Sue Young, Baggett, McCall & Burgess, Lake Charles, for applicants. <

MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. This lawsuit concerns monies that were transferred to defendants as part of a Ponzi scheme operated by a third party, Lizette Morice. The plaintiffs, who lost their investments in the fraudulent scheme, seek the voidance of these transfers under the Pennsylvania Uniform Fraudulent Trans*575fer Act a

759 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2010) Ralph REEDER, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Thomas CARROLL, M.D., Defendant. No. 09-CV-4013-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. December 21, 2010. *1067 Charles T. Patterson, Patterson & Prahl, L.L.P., Custer, SD, Jeffrey C. Clark, Julie Ann Sullivan, McGuire Woods, LLP, Chicago, IL

151 P.3d 1234 (2007) T.C. GREYWOLF, Appellant, v. William N. CARROLL, M.D., Appellee. No. S-11830. Supreme Court of Alaska. January 5, 2007. Rehearing Denied February 28, 2007. *1236 James M. Hackett, Law Office of James M. Hackett, Fairbanks, for Appellant. Donna M. Meyers, Delaney, Wiles, Hayes, Gerety,

JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendant Airbnb, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 111). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND This action arises from injuries sustained as a result of the collapse of a staircase. Andrew Callard, plaintiff in the now-settled consolidated action, rented a property at 1423

88 Ill.2d 407 (1981) 430 N.E.2d 976 KNOX COLLEGE, Appellee, v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al., Appellants. Nos. 53842, 53846, 53894 cons. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed November 13, 1981. Rehearing denied January 29, 1982. *410 Clausen, Miller, Gorman, Caffrey & Witous, P.C., of

321 F.Supp.2d 58 (2004) Catherine C. CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. Gordon R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Department of the Navy, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-01072(HHK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 18, 2004. *59 *60 *61

188 F.Supp.2d 1233 (2002) John CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. James NAKATANI, in his capacity as Chairperson/Director of the State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture, et al., Defendants. Patrick Barrett, Plaintiff, v. State of Hawaii, et al., Defendants. Nos. 00-CV-641, 00-CV-645. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. February 22, 2002.

188 F.Supp.2d 1219 (2001) John CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. James NAKATANI, in his capacity as Chairperson/Director of the State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture, et al., Defendants. Patrick Barrett, Plaintiff, v. State of Hawaii, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-641, 00-CV-645. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 12, 2001.

ORDER R. Bryan Harwell, United States District Judge Three motions to dismiss are before the Court in this case. See ECF Nos. 20, 21, & 22. Defendants CVS Health Corporation,1 South Carolina CVS Pharmacy, LLC, and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (collectively, “the Corporate Defendants”) filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as to CVS Health Corp

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT, SANCTIONS, AND RELATED MOTIONS LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. This patent infringement case involves computer technology for printing on remote devices. Computer users in the 1990s and early 2000s had to download and install drivers before performing most tasks, including printing. In 2000, Prin-terOn obtained two patents for automat

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Blackburn, United States District Judge The matter before is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.P. 56 [# 18],1 filed August 14, 2015. I grant the motion. I. JURISDICTION I have jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity of citizenship)

52 F.Supp.2d 546 (1999) Eric Q. CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF WESTMINSTER, et al., Defendants. No. Civ.A. MJG-94-2634. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 22, 1999. *547 *548 *549 Brian L. Wallace, Baltimore, Maryland and David L. Moore, Balti

727 F.Supp.2d 657 (2010) Nancy MARCUM, on behalf of herself and her minor daughter, C.V., Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BLOOM-CARROLL LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:08-cv-909. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 23, 2010. *661 Edward Joel Wesp, Wesp/Barwell, LLC, Attorneys

DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT McMAHON, District Judge. The question presented by this case is whether New York State has the authority to condemn property owned by National Railroad Passenger Corporation, known as Amtrak, in the face of certain federal statutes that created Amtrak and govern the use of its property. Amtrak brought this action against the Commissioner of th

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. This is a consolidated appeal. In Case No. 99-4494, Intervenor, Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust (“the Trust”), appeals from the district court’s order entered on August 20, 1999, granting summary judgment to Plaintiff, Dana . Corporation (“Dana”), on Dana’s suit for declaratory judgment, while also concluding that Dana did

460 F.Supp.2d 827 (2006) CARRIER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Paul P. PIPER, Jr., et al., Defendants. No. 05-2307 Ml/V. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. September 30, 2006. *828 *829 *830 Joey Miranda, Robinson & Cole LLP, H

623 F.Supp.2d 798 (2009) In Re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. American National Insurance Company, et al., Plaintiffs, v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Defendant. No. MDL-1446. Civil Action Nos. H-01-3624, G-02-0299. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.<

239 S.W.3d 304 (2007) GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Fred STEPHENS and Betty Stephens, Appellees. No. 01-05-00132-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 13, 2007. Rehearing Overruled October 13, 2007. Eric T. Furey, John R. Gilbert, Gilbert & Gilbert, Angleton, TX, Russell S. Post, David M. Gunn, Beck, Redden &