Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 28, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WAYNE ROBERT WAIT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. C-16182 Michael H. Meares, Judge (at trial) Jon Kerry Blackwood, Senior Judge (at sentencing)1 No. E2010-01212-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 28, 2011 A Bl

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 10, 2000 CHARLES WAYNE ROOKER v. DONAL CAMPBELL Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 99-946-III Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor No. M1999-01657-COA-R3-CV - Filed March 4, 2003 This appeal involves a dispute between a prisoner and the Department of Cor

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED NOVEMBER 1998 SESSION April 21, 1999 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. No

Cite as 2023 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: April 20, 2023 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2023 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2023 annual attorney-license fee was April 17, 2023.1 As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, attached

Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t

Cite as 2024 Ark. 67 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 18, 2024 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2024 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2024 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2024. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of

Cite as 2021 Ark. 92 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered April 22, 2021 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2021 ANNUAL ATTORNEY- LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2021 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2021. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an automatic suspension on th

641 F.3d 290 (2011) Leroy SANDERS; Stacy Ashcraft; Julee Pratt; Dorothy Bailey; John Banks; James Bennett; Jason Bottoms; Barbara Bottoms; Randal Brannum; Treva Brannum; Jack Bratton; Marlene Burks; Lisa Burton; William Chaney; Billy Chasteen; Sherry Chasteen; Kenneth Cooperwood; Garrett W. Davis; Lakesha Decker; David Degrandchamp; Debra Ann Dozier; Lenora Driver; Meshell Duffy; Randall Eligh; Marlena R. English; Martez Freeman; Randal Frolos; Twyla Gla

601 F.3d 523 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest Wayne ANGLIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-5018. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: February 25, 2009. Decided and Filed: April 7, 2010. *525 ON BRIEF: Caryll S. Alpert, Michael C. Holley, Office of the Federal Publi

Cite as 2020 Ark. 162 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Opinion Delivered April 23, 2020 IN RE SUSPENSION OF ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2020 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2020 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2020. Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar imposes an au

Cite as 2019 Ark. 234 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE UPDATED LIST OF Opinion Delivered: June 20, 2019 ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY 2019 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On April 25, 2019, we issued an opinion pursuant to Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar identifying attorneys who were suspended from the practice of la

32 F.3d 53 63 USLW 2110, 128 Lab.Cas. P 11,154,9 IER Cases 1281 UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO-CLCv.CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC., Appellant (in No. 93-2008).Charles A. THOMAS; Darren Boop; Robert W. Bower; WilliamD. Bridge; James Clingan; Neal B. Housner; Jonathan L.Noaker; Wayne D. Orner; Gerald W. Ranck; Harold E. VanSickle, Jr.; Richard A. Winter; Eugene L. Witmer,

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. It is a requirement of the law of our land that it be enforced in accordance with the procedures contained therein. Justice Felix Frankfurter summarized the justification for this sometimes onerous burden: “The safeguards of ‘due process of law’ and ‘the equal protection of t

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 28, 2001 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROSS BURGER Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 00-097 Carroll Lee Ross, Judge No. E2001-00941-CCA-R3-CD March 19, 2002 Defendant appeals the trial cou

The appellant was not on work release but on furlough. Escape from this status is an escape under § 13A-10-30 (b)(1), Code of Alabama 1975. Jenkins v. State, 367 So.2d 587 (Ala.Crim.App. 1979). OPINION EXTENDED; APPLICATION FOR REHEARING OVERRULED. All the Judges concur.

*363 OPINION PEAY, Judge. The defendant was charged with driving under the influence, fifth offense; driving on a revoked license, second offense; and reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon. He pled guilty to driving under the influence, second offense (“DUI”); driving on a revoked license (“DORL”); and reckless endangerment.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2010 at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. SAMUEL SHERRILL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wayne County No. 14503 Jim T. Hamilton, Judge No. M2009-01979-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 21, 2011 The Defendant, Samuel Sherrill, was indicted for second degree murder, a Class A felony.

813 F.Supp.2d 710 (2011) US AIRWAYS, INC., Plaintiff, v. US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION and Michael J. Cleary, Defendants. No. 3:11-cv-371-RJC-DCK. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte division. September 28, 2011. *713 Fred M. Wood, Jr., Charles Bailey King, Jr., Jonathan P. Heyl, Robert Reed Marcus, Smith

Talmadge, J. (dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion on the issue of Finch’s restraint by the trial court. The majority essentially negates our decision in State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wn.2d 863, 887-88, 959 P.2d 1061 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1157 (1999), and ignores the trial court’s findings of fact on the restraint questions we specially remanded to the trial court to decide.

Rubin, J. The defendant was convicted after a jury trial in the Superior Court on fourteen indictments related to the illegal and *486unlicensed possession of firearms, after police found firearms, ammunition, and silencers in his house while responding to a call indicating that the defendant’s mother was in distress. He argues that the motion judge erroneously denied his