Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Charlie R Davis, Jr”
Starbuck v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
WILLIAM G. YOUNG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE1 This Engle-progeny tobacco case has gone to trial three times. The first trial ("Starbuck I") ended in a mistrial because the jury was deadlocked. See Clerk's *1227Mins., ECF No. 98; Order, ECF No. 127. The second trial ("Starbuck II</
Davis v. Ssd Dept. of Ed.public domain
#25330, #25333-a-JKM 2011 S.D. 51 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA * * * * MARK DAVIS and BONNIE DAVIS, as individuals and as parents and natural guardians of CHARLIE DAVIS, CARL DAVIS, JOEY DAVIS, and SELENA DAVIS; KAY EBEN, as an individual and as parent and natural guardian of GRACE EBEN and KENDRA EBEN; DAN GRANT and JANE GRANT, as individuals and as parent
United States v. Charlie L. Greenpublic domain
USCA11 Case: 17-10346 Date Filed: 11/25/2020 Page: 1 of 27 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10346 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00205-EAK-MAP-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Charlie Javice v. JP Morgan Chase Bankpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHARLIE JAVICE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1179-KSJM ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ) JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., and TAPD, ) LLC,
Navarro v. Charlie Thomas Chevrolet, Ltd.public domain
ORDER TO PROCEED TO ARBITRATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF CASE EWING WERLEIN, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Among other motions pending are Defendant Charlie Thomas Chevrolet, Ltd. d/b/a AutoNation Mitsubishi’s (“AutoNation”) Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Stay or Dismissal of Litigation (Document No. 8), to which Plaintiff is unopposed,1 and Plaintiffs Motion for Vo
Starbuck v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................... 1284 A. Procedural Background................................ 1284 B. Factual Backgr
United States v. Charlie L. Greenpublic domain
Case: 17-10346 Date Filed: 08/11/2020 Page: 1 of 27 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10346 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00205-EAK-MAP-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Davis v. State of Floridapublic domain
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2022-3510 _____________________________ THOMAS LEROY DAVIS JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County. Timothy Register, Judge. April 18, 2024 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ROBERTS, KEL
Davis v. Dahmmpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge. This case is before the court pursuant to the joint motion to dismiss filed by defendants Dahmm and City of Elkins, Arkansas. Defendant, Dahmm, is a city policeman for the City of Elkins. It is difficult to ascertain whether defendants’ motion tests the subject-matter jurisdiction of this court under Rule 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., or whether it is defen
Sedmak v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.public domain
622 S.W.2d 694 (1981) Dr. Joseph T. SEDMAK, III and Linda Sedmak, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CHARLIE'S CHEVROLET, INC., a Missouri Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 41378. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. June 16, 1981. *695 Kappel, Neill & Staed, C. William Portell, Jr., St. Louis, for defendan
174 B.R. 223 (1994) In re Charlie D. DAVIS, Debtor. Charlie D. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. The STATE NATIONAL BANK, BIG SPRING, TEXAS and The United States Internal Revenue Service, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 691-60155-7. Adv. No. 694-6001. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, San Angelo Division. November 9, 1994. *224 Samue
Charles Matthews Davis, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 26, 2005 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 26, 2005. In The
People of Michigan v. Charlie Lee Floydpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 2, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 142617-8
PER CURIAM: Mr. Charlie Adventures, LLC, and Kim P. Kornegay (collectively, “Kornegay”), appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company (“Atlantic”) on Korne-gay’s bad-faith claim arising out of an insurance policy Atlantic had issued to provide coverage for a 40-foot yacht, called the “Mr. Charlie.” On appeal, Kornegay argues that the district court erred in granting A
People of Michigan v. Charlie Bernard MacOnpublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 24, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143167 & (1
DiBello v. Charlie Thomas Ford, Ltd.public domain
288 S.W.3d 118 (2009) Lorena DiBELLO, Appellant, v. CHARLIE THOMAS FORD, LTD. d/b/a Charlie Thomas Ford, Appellee. No. 01-08-00549-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). March 5, 2009. Rehearing En Banc Overruled April 23, 2009. *119 James H. Owen, Athens, TX, for Appellant. George A. Kurisky
State v. Davispublic domain
CHEHARDY, C.J. hOn appeal, defendant’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an Anders brief on defendant’s behalf asserting that there is no basis for a non-frivolous appeal. Further, defendant has filed a pro se supplemental brief alleging one assignment of error. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences. Facts and Procedural History
Davis v. Seidler (In Re HST Gathering Co.)public domain
125 B.R. 466 (1991) In re HST GATHERING COMPANY and Haskell Gathering Company, Debtors. Charlie DAVIS, d/b/a Houlihan Production Company, Appellant, v. Martin W. SEIDLER, Trustee, et al., Appellees. Civ. A. No. SA-88-CA-571, Bankruptcy Nos. 86-00346, 86-00347A. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. March 8, 1991. A. Ryland Howard, Lang,
Davis v. Statepublic domain
36 So.3d 456 (2010) George DAVIS, Jr., Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2007-CP-00578-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. May 25, 2010. *457 George Davis, Jr., Appellant, pro se. Office of the Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, Jackson, attorney for appellee. EN BANC. BARNES, J., for the Co
Porter v. Huginepublic domain
PITTMAN, Judge. In case no. 2110403, Melvin Bowers appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Dr. Andrew Hugine, Jr., in his official capacity as the president of Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University (“the University”), and 11 members of the University’s Board of Trustees (“the Board”),1 in their official capacities (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as “the University par