Cases

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kitson, J.), dated June 11, 2001, which granted the motion of the defendants Mairoll, Inc., Fairchild Communications Company, and Fairchild Holding Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

GRASZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Because I do not believe net protocol conversions qualify as information services under the federal Communications Act, I would reverse the district court's conclusion that federal law preempts state regulation of Charter's Spectrum Voice service. I. Background The FCC and the telecommunications industry have long debat

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 75, 81], and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Defendants’ Expert Robert Loube-[Doc. No. 91]. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion — Defendants’ moti

MEMORANDUM & ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is the resolution of whether Kansas or Illinois law governs Count IV, fraudulent concealment, and Count VI, fraud by silence, of plaintiffs first amended complaint (Docs. 158, 159). For the following reasons, the Court Orders that Kansas law shall govern plaintiffs fraudulent concealment and

712 S.E.2d 730 (2011) SUGAR CREEK CHARTER SCHOOL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. STATE of North Carolina, et al., Defendants. No. COA10-965. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 2, 2011. *732 North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law, by Jason Kay and Robert F. Orr, Raleigh, for Plaintiff-Appellants, Sugar Creek Charter

592 F.3d 805 (2010) CUNNINGHAM CHARTER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. LEARJET, INC., Defendant-Petitioner. No. 09-8042. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted November 13, 2009. Decided January 22, 2010. Ron A. Sprague, submitted, Gendry & Sprague, P.C., San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Petitioner. James F. Bennet

MEMORANDUM & ORDER HERNDON, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court is plaintiff Cunningham Charter Corporation’s (“Cunningham Charter”) Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 64). Defendant Learjet, Inc. (“Learjet”), opposes the Motion (Doc. 69). Also pending is Learjet’s Motion for Oral Argument on the Issue of Class Certification (Doc. 75). Because the Court denies Cunningham Charter’s Motion f

442 F.Supp.2d 569 (2006) Toni BENNETT, as Special Administrator of the ESTATE OF James BENNETT, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. NORTHLAKE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Limited Partnership; Reit Profit Sharing Trust; and the Burlington Northern and Santa FE Railway Company, a Corporation, Defendants. No. 04 C 8109. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. Augus

711 N.W.2d 391 (2006) 269 Mich. App. 365 ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CANTON, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 256791. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted January 5, 2006, at Detroit. Decided January 10, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication March 31, 2006.

STEIN, J., concurring. I join the Court’s thoughtful, comprehensive, and persuasive disposition of this appeal. I write separately only to add an observation that I am confident is implicit in the Court’s opinion. The Court correctly observes that “[t]he choice to include charter schools among the array of public entities providing educational services to our pupils is a choice appropriately made by the Legi

260 S.W.3d 529 (2008) ACADEMY OF SKILLS & KNOWLEDGE, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. CHARTER SCHOOLS, USA, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 12-07-00027-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. June 25, 2008. Rehearing Overruled August 28, 2008. *532 J. Bennett White, for Appellant. Richard M. Grimes,

52 F.3d 325NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Larry L. FAIRCHILD, doing business as Fairchild WasteControl, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BUENA VISTA CHARTER TOWNSHIP; Thomas Lynch, III, JohnParrott, Robert Parent, Denni

Jacob Bennett v. Harford County, Maryland, No. 38, September Term, 2022. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – ELIGIBILITY TO BE A HARFORD COUNTY COUNCIL MEMBER Section 207 of the Harford County Charter, which prevents a Council member from holding employment in the government of the State, Harford County, or any municipality within Harford County, does not preclude a teacher employed by the Harford County Board of Education from simultaneously serving as a member of the Harford County Council. Finding C

Jacob Bennett v. Harford County, Maryland, No. 38, September Term, 2022. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – ELIGIBILITY TO BE A HARFORD COUNTY COUNCIL MEMBER Section 207 of the Harford County Charter, which prevents a Council member from holding employment in the government of the State, Harford County, or any municipality within Harford County, does not preclude a teacher employed by the Harford County Board of Education from simultaneously serving as a member of the Harford County Council. Finding C

Circuit Court for Harford County Case No. C-12-CV-22-000857 IN THE SUPREME COURT Argued: April 4, 2023 OF MARYLAND* No. 38 September Term, 2022 ________________

278 F.Supp.2d 417 (2003) ASBURY PARK BOARD OF EDUCATION, Plaintiff, v. HOPE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-2421 (MLC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 27, 2003. *418 Stephen J. Edelstein, Esq., Schwartz, Simon, Edelstein, Celso & Kessler, LLP, Florham Park, NJ, for Plaintif

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued April 19, 2024 Decided September 3, 2024 No. 23-7057 MARGDA PIERRE-NOEL, “MS. PIERRE,” ON BEHALF OF HER MINOR CHILD K.N., APPELLANT v. BRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL AND DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEES Appeal from the United Stat

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1023 Doc: 128 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47550 In the Matter of the Guardianship of ) John Doe, A Minor Child. ) JON and RONDA NICHOLSON, ) ) Opinion Filed: April 14, 2020 Petitioners-Respondents, ) ) Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk v.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1001 Doc: 134 Filed: 06/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 103 ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1001 BONNIE PELTIER, as Guardian of A.P., a minor child; ERIKA BOOTH, as Guardian of I.