Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cheng v. Martin”
Jin Cheng Zhao v. Gonzalespublic domain
*35 SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Jin Cheng Zhao (“Zhao”), a native and citizen of The People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a September 5, 2006 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings on grounds that his attorney was ineffective. In re Zhao, No. A 73 176 107 (B.I.A. September 5, 2006). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the un
Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp. v. M/V Fu an Chengpublic domain
681 F.Supp.2d 737 (2009) ORMET PRIMARY ALUMINUM CORP, et. al v. M/V FU AN CHENG et. al. Civil Action No. 08-1667. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. September 18, 2009. Philip S. Brooks, Jr., Ronald Joseph Kitto, Montgomery Barnett, New Orleans, LA, for Ormet Primary Aluminum Corp, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company. *73
Cheng v. Neumannpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1124 DANA CHENG; EPOCH GROUP, INC., d/b/a Epoch Media Group, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. DAN NEUMANN; MAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE, d/b/a Beacon, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District
Cheng v. Fordpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this
Hatcher v. Chengpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 39). A hearing oii the motion was held on July 28, 2014, and the motion was taken under advisement. For the following reasons, the motion to dis
Cheng v. New York Telephone Co.public domain
64 F.Supp.2d 280 (1999) Victor CHENG, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY and Communications Workers of America, Local 1101, Defendants. No. 96 Civ. 0109(JES). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 31, 1999. *281 Noah A. Kinigstein, New York City, for plaintiff. Steven M. Martin, New York City, for defen
Cheng-Lu Hsieh v. Pei Ti Tung (In re Pei Ti Tung)public domain
MEMORANDUM ** Debtor, Pei Ti Tung, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington on June 4, 2002. Cheng-Lu Hsieh timely brought an adversary proceeding asserting the nondis-chargeability of her claim against Tung pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), an exception in the Bankruptcy Code that prevents the discharge of debts resulting fr
Daibes v. Chengpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Charles J. Markey, J. This personal injury action, stemming from a multivehicle collision, raises interesting issues regarding consolidation, venue, comity, judicial economy, the avoidance of forum shopping, and a seeming conflict between the “first-in-time rule” and the convenience of material witnesses where actions have been filed in two or more counties concerning the same set of fac
Martin v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-250V (to be published) ************************* Chief Special Master Corcoran NEONA MARTIN, on behalf of the * ESTATE OF JOSEPH JAMES MARTIN, * * Filed: July 17,
Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc Corporationpublic domain
POOLE, Circuit Judge: Chen-Cheng Wang, a mechanical engineer, brought suit against his former employer, the FMC Corporation, under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (1986). Wang claimed that FMC defrauded the government by its performance on various defense contracts, including one for work on a cou
In re: Bill Martin Parkerpublic domain
FILED MAY 29 2012 1 SUSAN M SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL 2 ORDERED PUBLISHED O F TH E N IN TH C IR C U IT 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL 4 OF THE N
OPINION GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice. In Five Issues, Appellant, Maria Castro, appeals the trial court’s denial of her bill of review regarding its order to release child support arrearages. BACKGROUND Castro and Appellee, Martin Ayala, divorced in 1997, and Castro was awarded custody of their three m
OPINION ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Frank Jimenez-Dominguez (“Jimenez”) appeals his conviction and sentence for a violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1326. Jimenez contends that his conviction should be reversed because the district court failed to inquire whether his guilty plea was the result of discussions between the United States and him or his attorney as r
Martin v. Warden, Atlanta Penitentiarypublic domain
804 F.Supp. 1530 (1992) Thomas James MARTIN v. WARDEN, ATLANTA PENITENTIARY, et al. Civ. No. 1:92-cv-1762-WCO. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 16, 1992. Richard M. Langway, Office of U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for Government of Canada and Warden. W. Bruce Maloy, Maloy & Jenkins, Atlanta, Ga., for Thomas James Martin.
206 F.3d 308 (3rd Cir. 2000) XU CHENG LIANG, Petitionerv.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentGIOACCHINO CINQUEMANI, Petitionerv.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RespondentCARMELO JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Petitionerv.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent No. 99-5327 No. 99-5053 No. 99-6039 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THI
481 F.3d 661 Jerry DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee,Dux Capital Management Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.YAGEO CORPORATION; Yageo Holding (Bermuda) Limited; Yan Sheng Chan; An-Ehr Chen; Cheng-Ling Lee, Defendants-Appellants,Equity Plus Securities, Limited; Rex Y.C. Yang; Wen-Chin Yeh, Defendants-Appellants.Dux Capital Management Corporation; Jerry Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Yageo Corporation; Yageo Holding (Bermuda) Lim
Commonwealth v. Chengpublic domain
Ronan, J. The defendants Cheng, a physician, and McCue, a florist, were indicted, tried and convicted of conspiracy, commencing on August 25, 1939, and terminating on the date of the indictment, to use unlawfully certain instruments upon one Catherine Dulong for the purpose of procuring.an abortion. The case is here on exceptions taken to rulings upon evidence and to the denial of certain requests for instructions to the jury.
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge: Aex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven Ng appeal from judgments of conviction entered on various dates in October and November 1992 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Reena Raggi, Judge, after a ten-week jury trial. Each of
OPINION No. 04-10-00602-CV MARIN REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, L.P., Derra Edwards, Hugh L. Lam, James P. Shee, Cheng-Lein C. Shee, Ricardo Velasquez, Gary M. Maganaris, Robin K. Pang-Maganaris, Dennis E. Gauthier, Cecilia G. Gauthier, Leal Urgin, Dresden & Goldberg Invesco, LLC, Maganaris Family Trust, and Boerne Trust’s, G2 Assets, LLC, Appellants
171 F.3d 648 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Narin Prasert VONG, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.Khanesavanh Nhalay, also known as Khan, Appellant.United States of America, Appellee,v.David Edward Martin, Appellant. Nos. 98-1719, 98-1725, 98-2342. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 9, 1999.