⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Cherif v. Department of Veterans Affairs”

District Court, D. Maryland · 1987-12-22 · Published · cited 0× · 675 F. Supp. 999; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11896; 1987 WL 3660
SMALKIN, District Judge. This is an action filed by a number of veterans, and a veterans’ group, contesting certain benefit reduction actions taken by the Veterans Administration, in implementation of the so-called Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, P.L. 99-177, 99 Stat. 1037. The Veterans Administration, like all federal executive and independent agencies, was faced with a 4.3 per cent reduction in programmatic funding (by seques
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-02-22 · Published · cited 54× · 478 F.3d 588; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 3810; 2007 WL 529689
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge JOHNSTON concurred. Judge TRAXLER wrote a separate concurring opinion. *591OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to the bilateral Extradition Treaty between the United States and Peru, see Extradition Treaty, U.S.-Peru, July 26,
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-03-10 · Published · cited 2× · 373 F. Supp. 2d 7; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3644; 2005 WL 729177
AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER and JUDGMENT WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. [[Image here]] *14[[Image here]] *15[[Image here]] I.Introduction This case involves claims by Vietnamese nationals and an organization, The Vietnamese
Griego v. Oliverpublic domain
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 58× · 5 N.M. 320; 2014 NMSC 003
OPINION CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} “All persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness.” N.M. Const, art
Griego v. Oliverpublic domain
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 14× · 2014 NMSC 3
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 16:00:53 2014.01.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014
Ordinola v. Hackmanpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT WILMER YARLEQUE ORDINOLA,  Petitioner-Appellee, v. JOHN HACKMAN, Acting United  No. 06-6126 States Marshal for the Eastern District of Virginia, Respondent-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virgini
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996-08-29 · Published · cited 58× · 93 F.3d 1100; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22208; 1996 WL 490738
JON 0. NEWMAN, Chief Judge: This appeal presents a novel challenge to the constitutionality of the United States extradition statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3184 (1994), which has governed the extradition of fugitives found in this country for nearly 150 years. Petitioner-appellant Paolo Lo Duca appeals from the July 24, 1995, judgment of the
District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1993-06-11 · Published · cited 8× · 829 F. Supp. 807; 27 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1921; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19172
829 F.Supp. 807 (1992) The AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. SYSCO CORPORATION, Sysco Food Services, Inc., and Bell Sysco Food Services, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. 1:92CV190. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division. October 26, 1992. Reconsideration Granted in Part June 11, 1993. *8
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-03-28 · Published · cited 26× · 373 F. Supp. 2d 7; 2005 WL 729177
373 F.Supp.2d 7 (2005) In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. The Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin; Phan Thi Phi Phi; Nguyen Van Quy and Vu Thi Loan, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Nguyen Quang Trung and Nguyen Thi Thuy Nga, Their Children; Duong Quynh Hoa, Individually and as Administratix of the Estate of Her Deceased Child, Huynh Trung Son; Ho Kan Hai, Individually and as Parent and Natural G