Cases

120 P.3d 484 (2005) 2005 OK CIV APP 56 Emery Maze BARTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Cheryl Diane WARREN, individually, and in her official capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Darryl Dewayne Warren, Defendant/Appellee. No. 100,496. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1. July 22, 2005. Matthew C. Goodin, Matthew C. G

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 21-1575 ______ CHERYL BOROWSKI, Esq., Appellant v. KEAN UNIVERSITY; DAWOOD FARAHI; CHARLES WILLIAMS; STEVEN KUBOW; KENNETH GREEN, Esq.; FARAQUE CHOWDHURY; CHRISTOPHER MYERS ____________ On Appeal from the Unit

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 21-1515 GEORGE L. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHERYL EPLETT, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. No. 3:19-cv-01

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT FRANK UGENTI and CHERYL UGENTI, Appellants, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, INC., 1 Appellee. No. 4D2021-2564 [April 18, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00760-COA CHERYL BURRELL APPELLANT v. GEOFFREY BURRELL APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/16/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. RONALD DOLEAC COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAMAR COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR AP

FILED Oct 30 2023, 8:29 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed December 4, 2003 Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed December 4, 2003. In The

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1406 CHERYL KELLOGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY d/b/a INDIANA ACADEMY FOR SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND HUMANITIES, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ A

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1406 CHERYL KELLOGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY d/b/a INDIANA ACADEMY FOR SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND HUMANITIES, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ A

MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. In High v. Kuhn , 191 So.3d 113 (Miss. 2016) ( High I ), we reversed and rendered the judgment of the special court of eminent domain, specifically finding the plaintiffs, Todd and Angela

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-1406 CHERYL KELLOGG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BALL STATE UNIVERSITY d/b/a INDIANA ACADEMY FOR SCIENCE, MATHEMATICS AND HUMANITIES, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ A

MARTHA LEPREE * NO. 2022-CA-0853 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CHRISTOPHER DORSEY AND * CHERYL FIELDS FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTR

Lynch, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Connerton, J.), entered June 17, 2016, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody. Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent Brian XX. (hereinafter the father) are the divorced parents of two children (born in 20

MAXWELIj,, Justice, for the-Court: ¶ 1. The special court of eminent domain granted Todd and Angela Kuhn’s petition for a private road across Cheryl High’s property in Gulfport. To obtain the private road, the Kuhns utilized Mississippi Code Section 65-7-201 (Rev.2012). This section creates a statutory right for private citizens to petition the special court

C I e w-1< of -th2 Court Court of Cr;m;no..l App~ole P.o.Box t2.3o8 Aus--b n, Texas 7811 I ~rECEIVED ~~ OO!mT OF CAIMINAL APP&J,S NOV 02 2015 . Wo...v--.re'l'l P;ev-rcg Co..-V'la.cly ·-#:" 12.2-, 8'·+ AIW

80 B.R. 101 (1987) In the Matter of: DAVID B. ULLMAN and Cheryl A. Ullman, dba Midas Muffler, Springfield, Ohio, Debtor. James R. WARREN, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. The HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 3-86-02571, Adv. No. 3-87-0043. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. December 8, 1987. James R. Warren, trustee, plaintiff. Barry

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal requires us to decide whether the District Court erred when it denied a police officer’s motion to dismiss a civil rights action. I On the evening of September 28, 2009, fifteen-year-old Nicole James sent a text message to a friend stating that she plan

FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/8/2015 10:29:51 AM INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk You

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge. Ralph and Cheryl Thornton own the only automobile wrecking yard in St. Hel-ens, Oregon. The Thorntons claim that the City of St. Helens has unlawfully conditioned approval of their annual applications to renew a state wrecker’s certificate on compliance with local land use regulations. Following repeated delays in the processing of the Thorntons’ renewa

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Daniei Warren commenced this action by filing a Complaint, on April 6, 2006, against the United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, National Indian Gaming Commission (“NIGC”), and various individual federal officials (together, the “Federal Defendants”), and George E. Pataki as Governor o