⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Cheryl Lane Thompson”

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
05/01/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 5, 2019 Session CHERYL MEROLLA v. WILSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 2013-CV-315 Clara W. Byrd, Judge ___________________________________
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022-11-23 · Published · cited 3× · 179 N.Y.S.3d 682; 210 A.D.3d 1031; 2022 NY Slip Op 06733
Thompson v City of New York (2022 NY Slip Op 06733) Thompson v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 06733 Decided on November 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Thompson v. Dukepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989-08-14 · Published · cited 32× · 882 F.2d 1180; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 12286
882 F.2d 1180 Anthony Wayne THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Cheryl L. DUKE, Chester J. Pucci, Floyd Cox, Robert Guthrie,Rita Allen, Harold Thomas, Michael Lane, Paul J. Klincar,Philip T. Hardiman, Roy Patrick, Dr. William Powell, and theCounty of Cook, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-1147. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 30,
Thompson v. Dukepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989-08-14 · Published · cited 11× · 882 F.2d 1180; 1989 WL 91992
KANNE, Circuit Judge. While incarcerated and awaiting his parole violation hearing, Anthony Wayne Thompson was severely beaten by another inmate. Thompson brought a section 1983 action against various state defendants, alleging that their failure to schedule and conduct a timely parole violation hearing constituted a deprivation of his constitutionally protected liberty interests. He also sued various county defendants, al
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Feb 02 2016, 8:36 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Jeffrey J. Lorenzo Rodney E. Far
Nelson v. Robinsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 454 F. App'x 174
PER CURIAM: George Patton Nelson, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Nelson’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal, and we affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated by the district court. Nelson v. Robinson, No. 3:08-cv-00603-HEH, 2011 WL 2358542 (E.D. Va. J
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 28, 2014 Session THE ESTATE OF CHERYL LYNN QUINN, BY PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, WILLIAM PAUL QUINN v. THOMAS HENDERSON ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No. L-17653 David R. Duggan, Judge No. E2013-02398-COA-R3-CV-FILED-NOVEMBER 1
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 17, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 17, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-08-04 · Published · cited 273× · 417 F.3d 565; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16034; 2005 WL 1846994
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, with whom Judge GIBBONS joins, concurring. All three judges on the panel can agree on one thing: The constitutionality of Officer Foubert’s use of force against Lyons is a difficult and fact-intensive question under our case law, but one that we nonetheless are obliged to reach at the outset under the two-step qualified-immunity inquiry announced in Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 1
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994-03-09 · Published · cited 9× · 871 S.W.2d 548; 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 505; 1994 WL 68759
871 S.W.2d 548 (1994) T. Lane SCOTT, Appellant, v. HARRIS METHODIST HEB and Tarrant Appraisal District, Texas, Appellees. No. 2-93-150-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 9, 1994. *549 Patricia K. White, Fort Worth, for appellant. Cheryl E. Diaz, Thompson & Knight, Dallas, Catherine Jane Alder, Catherine J
Scott v. Galushapublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995-01-31 · Published · cited 97× · 890 S.W.2d 945; 1994 WL 719698
890 S.W.2d 945 (1994) T. Lane SCOTT, Appellant, v. Newton GALUSHA, Dixon Presnall, Barry Alldredge, Jonathan Richard, Gary Jones, Scott Hall, and Robert Sewell, Appellees. No. 2-93-237-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. December 30, 1994. Rehearing Overruled January 31, 1995. *947 Patricia K. White, Fort
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04166
Laborde v Creative Closet & Design, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04166) Laborde v Creative Closet & Design, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 04166 Decided on July 16, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Nielson v. Talbotpublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 2018-04-04 · Published · cited 13× · 415 P.3d 348
BEVAN, Justice. I. NATURE OF THE CASE This is a property line dispute. Appellants, Glen and Cheryl Nielson (the "Nielsons"), challenge a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondents, Robert and Michele Talbot (the "Talbots") and Paul and Saundra Parker (the "Parkers"). The Parkers and Talbots were neighbors. The Parkers sol
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 6085
Galano v ILC Holdings, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 06085) Galano v ILC Holdings, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 06085 Decided on September 19, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Kendrick v. Pippinpublic domain
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011-05-09 · Published · cited 117× · 252 P.3d 1052; 2011 WL 1758826
Justice EID, dissenting. I agree with the majority's conclusion that the district court properly refused to instruct the jury on res ipsa loquitur and properly denied Kendrick's motion for a new trial based on jury misconduct. But I disagree with its ultimate conclusion that Kendrick should be given a new trial on the ground that the district court improperly instructed the jury on the sudden emergency doctr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-03 · Published · cited 19× · 501 F.3d 1037; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10343
501 F.3d 1037 (2007) GOLDEN NORTHWEST ALUMINUM, INC., Petitioner, Public Utility District No. 1 of Cowlitz County, Petitioner-Intervenor, v. BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent. Public Utility District No. 1 of Benton County; Public Utility District No. 1 of Cowlitz County; Public Utility District No. 1 of Franklin County; Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County; Public Utility District No. 1 of Grays Harbor County; Public U
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017-09-12 · Published · cited 9× · 226 So. 3d 608; 2017 Miss. App. LEXIS 538; 2017 WL 4005897
WESTBROOKS, J, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1, This appeal arises from a notice of claim filed by Wavie 1 Graham against the City of Jackson pursuant to the Mississippi Tort Claims Act (MTCA). Graham asserted that Officer Undráe Martin acted with reckless disregard for the safety of others when he hit h
Barnett v. Rogerspublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013-05-20 · Published · cited 1× · 400 S.W.3d 38; 2013 WL 2181269; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 626
DON E. BURRELL, J. Cheryl Barnett (“Petitioner”) sought to remove her brother, Roy Rogers, Jr., (“Trustee”), as trustee of the Roy Rogers and Dale Evans Rogers Trust (“the Trust”) and obtain awards of compensatory and punitive damages for Trustee’s alleged breach of his fiduciary duties to the Trust. After a bench trial, the trial court denied relief.1 In a single point relied on
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2014-11-24 · Published · cited 23× · 296 Ga. 315; 766 S.E.2d 456
Thompson, Chief Justice. These cases present constitutional and statutory questions arising from the use of private probation companies by Georgia courts to provide misdemeanor probation supervision services. Thirteen plaintiffs filed individual civil actions against Sentinel Offender Services, LLC, a private for-profit probation servicing entity, and other defendants seeking de