Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Chester H. Dawson”
Commonwealth v. Dawsonpublic domain
OPINION BY MUNDY, J.: Appellant, Staci Dawson, appeals from the November 12, 2014 aggregate judgment of sentence of 71$ to 143 months’ imprisonment, followed by 84 months’ probation, imposed after she was found guilty of two counts each of sale or transfer of firearms and criminal conspiracy, and one count of filing a false report.
Dawson v. Clevelandpublic domain
[Cite as Dawson v. Cleveland, 2014-Ohio-1636.] [Please see vacated opinion at 2014-Ohio-500.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 99964 DARRELL E. DAWSON PLAINTIFF-APPELL
Chester v. Duval County School Boardpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The judgment of the circuit court is AFFIRMED. The petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to proceedings in the Circuit Court of Duval County. Alford v. Duval Co. School Board, 324 So.2d 174 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). RAWLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Williams v. West Chester State Collegepublic domain
Per Curiam Opinion, This action, was intended to have been filed within the original jurisdiction of this Court. A minor and his natural guardians filed a Complaint in Trespass against West Chester State College, five employees of West Chester State College, and the General State Authority (GSA). The Complaint alleges that the minor plaintiff, while attending an experimental school within West Chester State Col
Chester A. Schutz v. United Statespublic domain
HILL, Circuit Judge. Appellant Schütz was convicted on a two count indictment charging him with entering a bank with intent to commit a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), and taking deposits from the bank with intent to steal in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). Schütz directly appealed to this court, and his conviction
Dawson v. District of Columbiapublic domain
217 A.2d 664 (1966) Thomas S. DAWSON, Jr., Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. Nos. 3851, 3852. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 21, 1966. Decided March 24, 1966. *665 O. B. Parker, Washington, D. C., with whom William A. Bachrach, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant
H. B. Zachry Co. v. Commissionerpublic domain
H. B. Zachry Company, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentH. B. Zachry Co. v. CommissionerDocket No. 903-66United States Tax Court
Whitmire v. H. K. Ferguson Co.public domain
261 Cal.App.2d 594 (1968) H. L. WHITMIRE, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. H. K. FERGUSON CO., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. Civ. No. 11515. California Court of Appeals. Third Dist. Apr. 26, 1968. Bradford, Cross, Dahl & Hefner, Hardy, Erich & Brown, Cavan Hardy and Robert G. Wilson for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant.
Bosworth v. Parkspublic domain
JANE P. WISEMAN, Presiding Judge. T1 Chester A. Thayer, Frank De Rossitt Robinson, III, David M. Robinson, Jane Marie Robinson Neidenfeuhr, James Russell Robinson, Katherine Elizabeth Robinson Collins, Sarah Leigh Robinson Bloom, Joseph Clarkson Millspaugh, and Julie Millspaugh Beard (Freeman family) appeal from a trial court order overruling their "New Objection on Behalf of the Freeman Family' to Final Account and Petition f
304 B.R. 695 (2003) In re Josephine DANIELS, Debtor. Josephine Daniels, Plaintiff, v. County of Chester, Tax Claims Bureau, Leslie K. Bair, Director and Astro Group, LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-10845 SR, Adversary No. 03-0071. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. July 16, 2003. *696
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Musgrovepublic domain
203 Md. 231 (1953) 100 A.2d 27 WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION v. MUSGROVE ET AL. [No. 22, October Term, 1953.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided November 12, 1953. *233 The cause was argued before SOBELOFF, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ. Arthur C. Keefer,</
Crooks v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.public domain
768 A.2d 1106 (2001) Ryan T. CROOKS, Appellee v. COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted August 31, 2000. Decided April 11, 2001. Harold H. Cramer, Andrew S. Gordon, Timothy P. Wile, Harrisburg, James M. Sheehan, Media, for appellant. Dawson R. Muth, West Chest
Dawson v. Zayre Department Storespublic domain
346 Pa. Superior Ct. 357 (1985) 499 A.2d 648 Roseann DAWSON, Appellant, v. ZAYRE DEPARTMENT STORES. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 18, 1985. Filed October 18, 1985. *358 Joseph J. Chester, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Edward D. Klym, Pittsburgh, for appellee. Before ROWLEY, OLSZEWSK
United States v. Dawsonpublic domain
556 F.Supp. 418 (1982) UNITED STATES of America v. Lonnie DAWSON, a/k/a "Abdul Salim", William Roy Hoskins, a/k/a "Muhammad Waliyud-Din", Robert Hardwick, a/k/a "Fareed Abdul Shakoor". Cr. No. 82-00128-01 to 82-00128-03. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. December 21, 1982. *419 *420
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE : NO. 527 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN : THE 32nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET THE COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA : ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of February 2023, upon consideration of the Petition to Reestablish t
Dawson v. Parsonspublic domain
Chester, J. I think this motion presents practically the same question as was passed upon in this case by the Special Term upon a former motion, where the court denied an application to direct the receiver to make certain payments under the judgment appealed from. It is true that the former motion was not made on behalf of creditors, but on behalf of one of the members ,of the firm of Weed, Parsons & </
The City of Chesterpublic domain
JOHN B. McPHERSON, Circuit Judge. By agreement of counsel these four cases were heard together upon the same evidence. The cross-libels seek to fix the liability for a collision between the river steamboat City of Chester and the ocean-going tug J. S. W. Holton, and the other libels are for the resulting deaths of two members of the tug’s crew. The home port of the steamboat is Wilmington on the Delaware river, and her business i
Manuel v. Statepublic domain
SACK, Judge. The appellants were convicted of grand larceny and conspiracy to commit grand larceny, arising from their alleged operation of a confidence game. In the operation of this particular confidence game the operators persuade the victim that they have found a large sum of money in an exhibited poclcetbook purportedly left in a telephone booth, and they will permit the victim to participate in the find if she can demonstr
Dawson v. Joe Chester Artificial Limb Co.public domain
The respondent, Joe Chester Artificial Limb Company, appellant's employer, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of artificial limbs and orthopedic appliances, and for such purpose rents a room approximately 26 feet wide and 40 feet long, fitted with shelves and a counter, for a place of business. Just prior to May 4, 1940, said employer engaged carpenters to change a partition in the building, and upon completion of the carpenters' work, the evening of May 4th, appellant was employed at sev
Silver State Land LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-688C (Filed: May 6, 2020) ********************************************** ) SILVER STATE LAND LLC, ) Breach of land sale contract; Federal ) Land Policy and Management Act; Plaintiff, ) Bureau of Land Management;