Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 7, 2021 Decided February 11, 2022 No. 21-1075 CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Comm

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 7, 2021 Decided February 11, 2022 No. 21-1075 CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS On Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Comm

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 25, 2021 Decided August 13, 2021 No. 20-1025 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS Consolidated with 20-1138 On Petitions for Review of an Order

Case: 19-60896 Document: 00515905664 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 18, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRETT HERRINGTON, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 1: 21-cv-03159 (CJN) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Brett T. Herrington is a former United States Army Ranger who medically separated from service i

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 92-2225 ACTION FOR CHILDREN'S TELEVISION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents. COALITION ON SMOKING OR HEALTH, Intervenor.

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-2225 ACTION FOR CHILDREN'S TELEVISION,

06-1760-ag(L), 06-2750-ag (Con.), 06-5358-ag (Con.) Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________________________ August Term, 2009 (Argued: January 13, 2010, Decided: July 13, 2010) Docket Nos. 06-1760-ag, 06-2750-ag, 06-5358-ag

OPINION AND ORDER •REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Emergency In-junctive .Relief (“Motion”), ECF No. 7, and accompanying Memorandum in Support. ECF No. 8. The Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the Defendants’ enforcement of FAQ 33, which would reduce a statutory payment adjustment to hospitals, like the Plaintiff, that serve a disproportionate share ■

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT FILED: MAY 1, 2017 No. 15-1063 UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE & TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALLIANCE, ET AL., INTERVENORS Consol

*1014MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Animal Legal Defense Fund, as well as various other organizations and individuals,1 (collectively, “ALDF”), challenges section 18-7042 of the Idaho Code as unconstitutional. The State defendants, Governor Butch Otter a

18-2121-ag (L) Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and State of Vermont v. United States Environmental Protection Agency UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2019 Argued: November 20, 2019 Decided: June 5, 2020 Docket Nos. 18-2121-ag; 18-2670

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Henderson. Ginsburg, Senior Circuit Judge: The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), Pamela Geller, and Robert Spencer, 1 sought to run advertisements in Metrorail stations and on Metrobuses in the Washington, D.C. area. The Washington Metro

734 F.Supp.2d 668 (2010) FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Laurie Donnelly, Jennifer Allen, Dr. Joseph Heckman, Dane Miller, Cynthea Lee Rose, Eric Wagoner, Anne Cooper, and Michael Buck, Plaintiffs, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Margaret Hamburg, in her official capacity as Commissioner, United States Fo

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

527 F.3d 842 (2008) OUR CHILDREN'S EARTH FOUNDATION, and Ecological Rights Foundation; Ecological Rights Foundation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Michael O. Leavitt, Administrator of EPA; Steven L. Johnson, Defendants-Appellees, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies; Effluent Guidelines Industry Coalition; The Utility Water Act Group (UWAG); National Association of Clean Water Agencies (NACW

OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: In 1972 Congress passed the Clean Water Act (“CWA” or “the Act”) “to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.” See Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (Clean Water Act of 1972), Pub.L. No. 92-500, 86 Stat. 816 (1972), codified at 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a). Central to that legislation and later amendme

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OUR CHILDREN’S EARTH  FOUNDATION, and ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION; ECOLOGICAL RIGHTS FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; MICHAEL O. No. 05-16214 LEAVITT, Administrator of EPA; D.C. No. STEVEN L. JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees,

SCHWELB, Associate Judge, with whom Associate Judge FERREN and Senior Judge MACK join, and with whom Associate Judge REID joins as to Parts II, III and IV, concurring: Linda Carl claims that Children’s Hospital discharged her because she had testified before the Council of the District of Columbia in opposition to tort reform legislation and because she had appeared as an expert witness on behalf of plaint

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. See Dkt. No. 174. In short, Plaintiffs seek to prevent the implementation of rules creating a religious exemption (the "Religious Exemption") and a moral exemption (the "Moral Exemption") to the contraceptive mandate contained within the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"). See id. at 1; Relig