Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Chiles v. United States”
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Emory Taylor Chiles appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
537 U.S. 937 CHILESv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-5974. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A.
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: In this expedited appeal, Florida alleges it is injured by the United States’ failure to enforce the immigration laws. The State asserts claims under both the Administrative Procedure Act and the United States Constitution. Florida asks for equitable restitution of its unreimbursed expenses or for declaratory relief and an injunction requiring the Unite
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _____________________________________ No. 95-4061 _____________________________________ D. C. Docket No. 94-676-CIV-EBD LAWTON M. CHILES, JR., Governor of the State of Florida; STATE OF FLORIDA; DADE COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST, an agency and instrumenta
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
874 F.Supp. 1334 (1994) Lawton M. CHILES, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. 94-0676-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. December 20, 1994. *1335 Parker D. Thomson, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, FL, Louis F. Hubener, Ana Cristina Martinez, Asst. Atty. Gen.
United States v. Chilespublic domain
PER CURIAM. Marcus Chiles appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a drug charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), challenging the length of the sentence. Chiles pleaded guilty after entering into a written plea agreement containing an appeal wa
Chiles v. Salazarpublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
United States v. Chilespublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Emory Taylor Chiles seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificat
United States Ex Rel. Chiles v. Cooke Inc.public domain
25-155 United States ex rel. Chiles v. Cooke Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: September 24, 2025 Decided: August 5, 2026 No. 25-155 U NITED S TATES EX REL . W. B ENSON C HILES , U NITED S TATES EX REL . C HRIS M ANTHEY , Plaintiffs-A
Chiles v. Salazar Revisions: 3/31/26public domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Chiles v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chiles v. Jonespublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chiles v. Jordanpublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Chiles v. Jordan, Wardenpublic domain
543 U.S. 1160 CHILESv.JORDAN, WARDEN. No. 04-7586. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 2005. 1 C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 180.
Tyler v. Chilespublic domain
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.