⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Chloe Williams”

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998-02-24 · Published · cited 16× · 970 S.W.2d 516; 1998 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 222; 1998 WL 75539
OPINION WOODALL, Judge. The Defendant, Chloe Rainey Clark, appeals as of right from the trial court’s order revoking her probation and requiring her to serve her five (5) year sentence in the Department of Correction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Effective M
In re Chloe W.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 148 A.D.3d 1672; 49 N.Y.S.3d 595
*1673Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, J.), entered January 29, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to petitioner. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
In re Chloe W.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 148 A.D.3d 1672; 49 N.Y.S.3d 595
*1673Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, J.), entered January 29, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to petitioner. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
W., CHLOE, MTR. OFpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 341 CAF 16-00255 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND NEMOYER, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF CHLOE W. --------------------------------------- CATTARAUGUS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; AMY W., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. M. MARK HOWDE
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2014-06-19 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered June 19, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00455-CR CHLOE A. MENAGER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court N
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2025-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT In the Guardianship of Chloe Grace Dillon, * From the County Court at Law an incapacitated person, of Midland County, Trial Court No. G-12,913. No. 11-24-00244-CV * April 10, 2025 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002-11-12 · Published · cited 13× · 310 F.3d 975; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 23370; 2002 WL 31501136
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Eugene Joseph was convicted of bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1344, and sentenced to 10 months’ incarceration and 3 years’ supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Joseph submits that the district court erred by admitting “other crimes” evidence, specifically, a mail theft not charged in the federal indictment. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
People v. Williamspublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-12-13 · Published · cited 1× · 201 N.Y.S.3d 480; 222 A.D.3d 787; 2023 NY Slip Op 06389
People v Williams (2023 NY Slip Op 06389) People v Williams 2023 NY Slip Op 06389 Decided on December 13, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2025-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed April 10, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals ___________ No. 11-24-00244-CV ___________ IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF CHLOE GRACE DILLON, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON On Appeal from the County Court at Law Midland County, Texas Trial Court Cau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 NY Slip Op 01795
Matter of Chloe Ann Marie W. (2026 NY Slip Op 01795) Matter of Chloe Ann Marie W. 2026 NY Slip Op 01795 Decided on March 25, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2026-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 2026 CO 32
1 2026 CO 32 In Re Bella Boe, Chloe Coe, Danielle Doe
Idaho Supreme Court · 2020-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 48053 In the Matter of Application for Writ of ) Habeas Corpus. ) -------------------------------------------------- ) NOVA MARIE WILLIAMS, CHLOE ) REANNEN WAGER, ROSE MARIE FEW, ) JOY LYNN KIRKLAN, ALEXIS ALYCE ) MOON, BARBARA SIGRID WARR
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2012-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-11-0368-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JUNE 15, 2012
Hand v. Parrpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012-09-25 · Published · cited 0× · 170 Wash. App. 1051
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kitsap County, No. 09-2-02242-1, M. Karlynn Haberly, J., entered March 4, 2011. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Siddoway, A.C.J., concurred in by Brown and Kulik, JJ.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 963 F. Supp. 2d 852; 2013 WL 3816692; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102029
ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. This case requires the court to address what might be best characterized as a metaphysical question: did a spoken threat attributed to the defendant and indisputably vocalized in another district, occur in this district for purposes of establishing venue for the defendant’s criminal trial? 1. Background The defendant in this
Idaho Supreme Court · 2020-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 48053 In the Matter of Application for Writ of ) Habeas Corpus. ) -------------------------------------------------- ) NOVA MARIE WILLIAMS, CHLOE ) REANNEN WAGER, ROSE MARIE FEW, ) JOY LYNN KIRKLAN, ALEXIS ALYCE ) MOON, BARBARA SIGRID WARR
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 4× · 128 F. Supp. 3d 781; 116 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1630; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118124; 2015 WL 5164891
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge: Plaintiff Noval Williams Films LLC (“Noval” or “Plaintiff”) seeks a declaratory judgment against Defendants John Branca and John McClain, the executors of the Estate of Michael J. Jackson (collectively, “Defendants” or “Executors”) that it has not infringed any copyrights of certain audiovisual material and photographs used in its documentary
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010-08-04 · Published · cited 8× · 334 S.W.3d 199; 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 73; 2010 Tenn. App. LEXIS 500; 2010 WL 3059159
334 S.W.3d 199 (2010) Mary COLEMAN, et al. v. ST. THOMAS HOSPITAL. No. M2009-02526-COA-R10-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Western Section, at Nashville. May 26, 2010 Session. August 4, 2010. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court November 15, 2010. *200 Mary Martin Schaf
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998-09-29 · Published · cited 5× · 584 N.W.2d 430; 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 1095; 1998 WL 664632
584 N.W.2d 430 (1998) CUSTOM DESIGN STUDIO, A DIVISION OF L.B. BARON PROPERTIES, INC., Respondent, v. CHLOE, INC., Respondent, John G. Newman, Appellant, K & S Holdings, LLC, et al., Respondents. No. C4-98-229. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 29, 1998. Review Denied November 24, 1998. *431 Jo
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-07-06 · Published · cited 0× · 263 F. Supp. 3d 532
MEMORANDUM PAPPERT, J. Since 2003, the Giovannis have lived in close proximity to the Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow Grove and the Naval Air Warfare Center Warminster. After discovering that chemicals from the naval facilities infiltrated their water supply, and concerned that they are at a higher risk of developing illpesses as a result of this contamination, the Giovannis sued the United Sta