⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Chris Carr v. Robert Bradley”

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00513-CV Robert Blankenship and Chris Mashburn, Appellants v. William Wolfenson, Appellee FROM THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 688-335, THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2026-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ROBERT GLADSTONE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0867-PAF ) EBC HOLDINGS, INC. and ) FIREBRAND FINANCIAL ) GROUP, ) INC., )
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
fraudtech v. choicepoint COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-347-CV FRAUD-TECH, INCORPORATED, DEAN APPELLANTS
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-01-347-CV FRAUD-TECH, INCORPORATED, DEAN <
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 415 S.W.3d 327; 2013 WL 4076868
OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of
Neil Leist, Philip Smith and Incomco v. John Richard Simplot, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot Products Co., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc., Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, Gerald Rafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, Stephen Sundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc., Charles Edelstein, Robert Edelstein, Murial Edelstein, Meierfeld & Company, Inc., Gilbert Meierfeld, David Meierfeld, Robert Reardon, F. J. Reardon, Inc., Harold Collins, Caspar Mayerson, Lynnewood Exporting Company, Alex Sinclair, Manning Stoller, Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes Inc., Mfx Commodities, Inc., Donald Silver, Duane South, Kenneth Ramm, a & B Farming Inc., Hugh Glenn, Gearheart Farming, Inc., Edward McKay "John" Humphreys, Frank Fullmer, Clayton Brokerage Co. Of St. Louis, Inc., Heinold Commodities, Inc., Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss, Kohlmeyer, Inc., New York Mercantile Exchange, Richard B. Levine, Howard Gabler, Alfred Pennisi, Incomco v. Wayne County Produce Co., and Harold Collins, New York Mercantile Exchange, National Super Spuds, Inc., William R. Buster, Jr., Willard C. Chiner, Eugene P. Weismen, Richard Welts, Raymond Rothberg, Arthur S. Armstrong, Theodore Brinek, Capgain Holdings, Inc., and Heiz Romminger, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. New York Mercantile Exchange, Clayton Brokerage Co. Of St. Louis, Inc., Pressner Trading Corp., Jack Richard Simplot, J. R. Simplot Co., Simplot Industries, Inc., Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares Co., C. L. Otter, Simtag Farms, Kenneth Ramm, a & B Farms, Inc., Hugh v. Glenn, Gearheart Farming, Inc. And Ed McKay Heinold Commodities, Inc., Thompson & McKinnon Auchincloss, Kohlmeyer, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981-02-23 · Published · cited 77× · 638 F.2d 283
638 F.2d 283 Neil LEIST, Philip Smith and Incomco, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.John Richard SIMPLOT, J. R. Simplot & Co., Simplot ProductsCo., Inc., Simplot Industries, Inc., Simtag Farms, Inc.,Peter J. Taggares, P. J. Taggares & Co., Henry A. Pollack,Harvey B. Pollack, Harvey B. Pollack Company, GeraldRafferty, Pressner Trading Corp., Benjamin Pressner, StephenSundheimer, Jules Nordlight, Edelstein & Co., Inc.,
State v. Milopublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022-05-20 · Published · cited 14× · 510 P.3d 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,726 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KEESHAUN W. MILO, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Felony murder imposes strict liability for homicides caused by
State v. Milopublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,726 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. KEESHAUN W. MILO, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Felony murder imposes strict liability for homicides caused by
Belya v. Kapralpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-02-08 · Published · cited 5× · 59 F.4th 570
21-1498 Belya v. Kapral, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 8th day of February, two thousand twenty-three. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, JOSÉ A. CABRANES, RAYM
Stacy v. Gibsonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ohio 2751
[Cite as Stacy v. Gibson, 2019-Ohio-2751.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY ROBERT STACY : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 28204 : v.
Allen v. Milliganpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-08 · Published · cited 39× · 599 U.S. 1
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 1–109 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 8, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are reque
Poe v. Drummondpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 23-5110 Document: 248-1 Date Filed: 08/06/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 6, 2025
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
[J-65A-C-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON JJ. LARRY KRASNER, IN HIS OFFICIAL : No. 2 EAP 2023 CAPACITY AS THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY : OF PHILADELPHIA : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on : December 30, 2022 a
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
[J-65A-C-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON JJ. LARRY KRASNER, IN HIS OFFICIAL : No. 2 EAP 2023 CAPACITY AS THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY : OF PHILADELPHIA : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on : December 30, 2022 a
Groff v. DeJoypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 277× · 600 U.S. 447
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 447–476 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0×
[J-65A-C-2023] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON JJ. LARRY KRASNER, IN HIS OFFICIAL : No. 2 EAP 2023 CAPACITY AS THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY : OF PHILADELPHIA : Appeal from the Order of : Commonwealth Court entered on : December 30, 2022 a
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023-02-22 · Published · cited 9× · 60 F.4th 744
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1198 Doc: 94 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 44 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1198 DON BLANKENSHIP, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NBCUNIVERSAL, LLC; CNBC, LLC, Defendant
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011-06-30 · Published · cited 13× · 2011 Ohio 3277
[Cite as Akron Dev. Fund I, Ltd. v. Advanced Coatings Internatl., Inc., 2011-Ohio-3277.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) AKRON DEVELOPMENT FUND I, LTD. C.A. No. 25375 Appellee v. A
Bondi v. Vanderstokpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 604 U.S. 458
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 604 U. S. Part 2 Pages 458–517 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT March 26, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
State v. Hamdanpublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003-07-15 · Published · cited 60× · 2003 WI 113; 665 N.W.2d 785; 264 Wis. 2d 433; 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 612
264 Wis.2d 433 (2003) 2003 WI 113 665 N.W.2d 785 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Munir A. HAMDAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-0056-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument November 14, 2002. Decided July 15, 2003. *441 For the defendant-appellant t