Cases

Opinion GRIMES, J. Plaintiff and appellant Christine Foxen sued her former attorneys, defendants and respondents John Carpenter, Paul Zuckerman, Nicholas Rowley and Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley, LLP, who had represented her in a personal injury action. The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to plaintiffs operative first amended complaint on the ba

*1078 OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: In 2012, California enacted Senate Bill 863 (“SB 863”) to combat an acute “lien crisis” in its workers’ compensation system. These liens are filed by medical providers and other vendors to seek payment for services provided to an injured wor

VERDICTS AND SPECIAL FINDINGS Robert N. Chatigny, United States District Judge This criminal case is before the Court for decision following a bench trial. Defendant Daniel Carpenter is charged with.devising and executing a scheme to defraud life insurance companies by using misrepresentations to induce them to issue high-value universal life insurance policies to straw insureds,1

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment in part: To be taxable as self-employment income, an individual’s income must be (1) derived, (2) from a trade or business, (3) carried on by that individual. See 26 U.S.C. § 1402(a)-(b). Here the parties agree that the payments Christine Peterson received under Mary Kay’s Family Security Prog

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Once the wheat is shaken from the chaff, this apparently complex appeal can be resolved by deciding a threshold question (albeit one that has not previously been confronted by the courts of appeals). Consequently, we affirm the district court’s entry of judgment for the defendant on the basis that a recipient of benefits under the Aid to Families with Depen

*539In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Brookhaven appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated December 29, 2005, as granted those branches of the motion of the plaintiff Christine Hebbard, as mother and natural guardian of Michael Jarvis, which were for leave to serve a late no

45 Cal.Rptr.3d 821 (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 249 Robert CARPENTER, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Alameda County, Respondent; Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA, Real Party in Interest. No. A112761. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Five. July 11, 2006. *822 Meis & Alexander, Quinton B. Cutli

*807 OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Rafael Deitz filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the constitutionality of his 1997 conviction for drug trafficking. His petition was denied by the district court. The primary issue on appeal is whether

Connolly, Thomas E., J. This civil, personal injury, wrongful death case rises out of the suicide death of Julie Carpenter, age 20, while a student living at Random Hall dormitory, at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). There has been extensive discovery in this case. In Middlesex Superior Court, there was pending another case, involving the suicide of another MIT student Elizabeth H. Shin, captioned

529 U.S. 446 (2000) EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER No. 98-2060. United States Supreme Court. Argued February 28, 2000. Decided April 25, 2000. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT *448 Scalia, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O'Connor, Kennedy,

440 B.R. 390 (2010) In re HYMAN COMPANIES, INC., Debtor-in-Possession. No. 09-20523REF. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 28, 2010. *392 Angela Lynn Baglanzis, Edmond M. George, Michael D. Vagnoni, Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, LLP, Philadelphia, PA, Joseph Vogel, Kravet & Vogel, LLP, New York, NY, for

SELYA, Circuit Judge. Although this appeal presents an issue of first impression that requires us to navigate a complex maze of statutes and regulations, its resolution turns on the interpretation of two words in common usage. We hold, as did the court below, that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) permissibly concluded that the term “payment levels” as u

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., MERCIER, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. AL

344 F.Supp.2d 750 (2004) CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Viraj Group, Intervenor-Defendant. Slip Op. 04-103. Court No.02-00448. United States Court of International Trade. August 16, 2004. Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC (Robin H. Gilbert), Washington, DC, for the plaintiff. *751

OPINION {¶ 1} The defendants-appellants, Richard and Eileen Carpenter, appeal the judgment of the Union County Common Pleas Court ordering them to pay attorney's fees in the amount of $6,661.10 as a discovery sanction pursuant to Civ. R. 37. On appeal, the Carpenters argue that the plaintiff-appellee, Ralph Yeager, failed to meet his burden of proof in showing that attorney's fees were reasonable and nece

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Aquilino, Judge: This is another case contesting a determination of the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“ITA”) to group (or not to group) together Indian enterprises for purposes of enforcement of its Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India,

* Reporter's Note: A discretionary appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio was not allowed in (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 1446,686 N.E.2d 274. Defendant-appellant James J. Carpenter, born August 12, 1969, appeals from the following consolidated jury trial convictions: 1. Appellate case No. 70612/trial court no. 318200 — (a) promoting prostitution (

MEMORANDUM TUCKER, Chief Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs E.C. and C.O.’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Doc. 12), Defendant School District of Philadelphia’s Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 14), and Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Further Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Doc. 15). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-0599 Filed September 12, 2018 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF LAVERNE E. WORKMAN, Deceased, DENNIS WORKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. GARY WORKMAN, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of LaVerne E. Workman, Defendant-Appellee, CYNTHIA NOGGLE, RANDY NOGGLE, JASON WORKMAN, CHRISTINE THOMPSON, and JEFFREY WORKMAN, Defendants. ___________________________

MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Glenn Brian Carpenter appeals the district court’s 1 adverse ruling on his motion to exclude evidence seized during the warranted search of a residence. We affirm. I. On January 31, 2002, officer Andy Shoemaker of the Minnesota Ga