Cases

RULING ON MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS CHARLES S. HAIGHT, JR., Senior District Judge: In this action falling within the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction because the United States Government is a party Defendant (the named Defendants include Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner),1 the

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge AGEE joined. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: E.L. is a nine-year-old girl with autism. This appeal arises out of her parents’ dissatisfaction with the special education services provided to her by the Chapel Hill— Carrboro Board of Education (“the school board”), and their adm

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EXPERIENCE HENDRIX L.L.C., a Nos. 11-35858 Washington Limited Liability 11-35872 Company, and AUTHENTIC HENDRIX L.L.C., a Washington D.C. No. Limited Liability Company, 2:09-CV-00285- Plaintiffs-Appellants/ TSZ Cross-Appellees, ORDER AND v. A

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JANICE DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2022-3087 [January 11, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Ju

BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal a judgment in this voting rights case in favor of Defendants-Appellees (collectively referred to as “Coffee County”). The district court entered the judgment in favor of Coffee County after the parties agreed to stipulated facts and presented oral argument. For the reasons set out more fully below, we affirm. I Coffee County, Tennessee

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0226p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ CHRISTINE BEARDEN; DAVID BEARDEN; TERRI COOK; │ CAROLYN GIBBONS; E

Blackburn, Judge. In Allen v. Lefkoff, Duncan, Grimes & Dermer, 212 Ga. App. 560 (442 SE2d 466) (1994), we affirmed the trial court’s disallowance of any evidence of, reference to, or jury instruction on the defendant attorneys allegedly having violated certain provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed our decision in Allen v. Lefkoff, Duncan, Gr

212 Ga. App. 560 (1994) 442 S.E.2d 466 ALLEN v. LEFKOFF, DUNCAN, GRIMES & DERMER, P.C. et al.; and vice versa. A94A0660, A94A0767. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 8, 1994. Reconsideration Denied March 25, 1994. William R. Hurst, for appellant. Freeman & Hawkins, H. Lane Young, Christine L.

Nos. 13-1356 and 13-1088 affirmed; No. 12-2481 vacated and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DUNCAN joined. KING, Circuit Judge: Defendant Christine Boczar, a deputy sheriff of Powhatan County, Virginia, appeals the judgment of damages plus attorney’s fees entered against her in

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to our directions in a prior appeal in this matter, Duncan Energy Co. v. United States Forest Service, 50 F.3d 584 (8th Cir.1995) (Duncan I), the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the United States Forest Service and entered a permanent injunction. The Forest Service now appeals. We reverse and remand. This case involves the definition of

Sears, Justice. In this legal malpractice case, the Court of Appeals affirmed “the trial court’s disallowance of any evidence of, reference to, or jury instruction on the defendant attorneys allegedly having violated certain provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility.” Allen v. Lefkoff, Duncan, Grimes & Dermer, P.C., 212 Ga. App. 560 (442 SE2d 466) (1994).1 The Court of Appe

JOHN R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. The United States Forest Service and its district ranger for the Medora Ranger District, North Dakota, appeal from the district court’s entry of summary judgment granting declaratory relief to Meridian Oil, Inc. and Duncan Energy Company, an owner and developer of mineral rights. The district court allowed Duncan to proceed with mineral exploration on land in a national forest without Fo

David R. Duncan, Chief US Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Michelle L. Vieira, and the defendant, Anthony Whitfield. Both motions were filed on December 18, 2018. Both parties filed objections to the opposing party's motion on January 2, 2019. A hearing was held on the motions on February 5, 2019. For the reasons set forth below, the Court now grants the plain

ORDER on Use of Depositions at Trial in Lieu of Otherwise Available Live Testimony J. THOMAS GREENE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Delta’s Motion to Preclude Improper Use of Deposi*522tions at Trial. The motion has been fully briefed and it was taken under advisement following extensive oral argument. Having reviewed the submis

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VRAJESHKUMAR PATEL, ) individually and on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, and derivatively on ) behalf of Nominal Defendant TALOS ) ENERGY INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0418-MTZ

Filed: January 23, 2014 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2481 (3:11-cv-00646-REP-MHL) EILEEN MCAFEE, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. CHRISTINE M. BOCZAR, Defendant – Appellant, and JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2; JOHN DOE 3, Defendants.

932 A.2d 226 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Roger Ellis DUNCAN, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted June 11, 2007. Filed August 27, 2007. *227 Randall L. Miller, Reading, for appellant. Alisa R. Hobart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Reading, for the Com., appellee. BEFORE: HUDOCK, ORIE MELVIN

Chapter 7 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS David R. Duncan, Chief US Bankruptcy Judge This matter is before the Court on a motion to disqualify counsel for the defendants, Heritage Funding, LLC and Ronald F. LeGrand (“Defendants”), filed by the plaintiff, Michelle L. Vieira, Trustee (“Plaintiff’), on July 25, 2014. Defendants objected to the motion,

[Cite as Niese Holdings Ltd., L.L.C. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 2022-Ohio-3896.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Niese Holdings Ltd., LLC, : Appellant-Appellee, : No. 22AP-123 (C.P.C. No. 20CV-5819) v. :

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1851 ___________ Christine M. Brenneman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Dis