Cases

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00510-CV M. R., C. B., and J. R., Appellants v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-FM-12-006898, THE HONORABLE JAN SOIFER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINIO

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFFS’ BILL OF COSTS AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE COSTS (Document Nos. 52 and 51) NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Peter and Lisa Hillman (“Plaintiffs”), having accepted an Offer of Judgment from Berkshire Medical Center, Inc. (“BMC”), seek reimbursement for various costs, amounting in total to $11,101.39, in connection with their claims again

OPINION AND ORDER NORGLE, District Judge: Before the court is Defendant Honeywell, Inc.’s (“Honeywell”) Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the court grants the motion and enters judgment in favor of Honeywell and against Plaintiff Bettie Shivers (“Shivers”). I. Facts1 Shivers is an Afri

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to show causation is denied; their motion to exclude the opinions of Wesley Dennis, M.D. is granted in part and denied in part; and their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to individual defendant Michnal for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied.

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RBY&CC EAST SIDE ) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, ) INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0433-SEM ) PATRICK BEEBE and ) TAMMY BEEBE, )

Matter of Gabriel H. (2024 NY Slip Op 03588) Matter of Gabriel H. 2024 NY Slip Op 03588 Decided on July 3, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT IN THE MATTER OF: OPENING A : No. 444 WAL 2014 PRIVATE ROAD FOR THE BENEFIT OF : TIMOTHY P. O'REILLY OVER LANDS : OF (A) HICKORY ON THE GREEN : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, AND : Order of the Commonwealth Court (B) MARY LOU SORBARA; GREGORY : E. BURGUNDER; ANN E. CAIN; DON E. : COTTRILL & NORMA J. COTTRILL, : H/W; JOSEP

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Opening a Private Road : for the Benefit of Timothy P. O'Reilly : Over Lands of (a) Hickory on the Green : Homeowners Association, and (b) Mary : Lou Sorbara; Gregory E. Burgunder; : Ann E. Cain; Don E. Cottrill & Norma J. : Cottrill, h/w; Joseph K. Cupples; James D. : Dragoo & Linda J. Dragoo, h/w; Kimberly : M. Fonzi; Brian J. Gallagher & Diane J. : Gallagher, h/w; Dolores

520 F.Supp.2d 537 (2007) MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NUTRINOVA INC., Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GMBH, and Lonza, Ltd., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-896 GMS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. October 30, 2007. *538 *539

AARON, Acting P. J. *404I. INTRODUCTION Minor J.S. appeals a dispositional order adjudging him a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 and placing him on formal probation, subject to various terms and conditions. On appeal, J.S. argues that certain probation conditions that per

598 F.3d 1239 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto MACIEL-ALCALA, aka Ramon Alfredo Ramirez, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-50038. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 6, 2009. Filed March 25, 2010. *1240 Sean K. Kennedy and Alexandra W. Yates, Federal

478 F.Supp.2d 624 (2007) In re EPHEDRA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. Pertains To Stafford v. Weight Watchers Inc. et al, No. 05 Civ. 3021. No. 04 M.D. 1598(JSR). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 26, 2007. *625 *626 Anne Andrews, Andrews Kurth LLP, Dallas, TX, Catherine T

Kafker, C.J. The defendant, Carroll N. Heath, was convicted of assault and battery on a police officer pursuant to G. L. c. 265, *329 § 13D, and also of disturbing the peace. 2 He appeals the judge’s denial of his motion for a new trial on the

971 A.2d 486 (2009) In the Matter of Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of Timothy P. O'REILLY Over Lands of (A) Hickory On The Green Homeowners Association, and (B) Mary Lou Sorbara; Gregory E. Burgunder; Ann E. Cain; Don E. Cottrill & Norma J. Cottrill, h/w; Joseph K. Cupples; Bart V. Delcimmuto; James D. Dragoo & Linda J. Dragoo, h/w; Kimberly M. Fonzi; Brian J. Gallagher & Diane J. Gallagher, h/w; Dolores M. Gembarosky; Michael J. Gra

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

OPINION OF THE COURT A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge. On this appeal from a final judgment of conviction and sentence, the appellant presents four grounds for this Court’s review. He argues first, that the district court erred by failing properly to instruct the jury regarding the required unanimity of its verdict; second, that the district court a

Filed 7/11/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In re J.S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. D074139 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. J241043) v. J.S., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL f

35 F.Supp.2d 1151 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Gary R. EITEL, Plaintiff, v. Roy D. REAGAN, Defendants. No. Civ 97-169-TUC-WDB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. December 14, 1998. *1152 Stuart Michael Gerson, Epstein Becker & Green PC, Washington, DC, for Roy D. Reagan. Gerald K. Smith, John P. Fran

Sanders, J. (dissenting) — We have previously held “proof of a recent overt act is necessary to satisfy due process concerns when an individual has been released into the community.” In re Personal Restraint of Young, 122 Wn.2d 1, 41, 857 P.2d 989 (1993) (citing In re Harris, 98 Wn.2d 276, 284, 654 P.2d 109 (1982)). To embody this constitutional requirement the Washington State Legislature subsequently amended th

OPINION CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after trial on plaintiffs claim that the United States, through the United States Postal Service, infringed plaintiffs patent covering imprinted money order forms. After the court ruled on the construction of the disputed language in claims 1, 5, 6, and 10, plaintiff sought to prove defendant’s liability and damages, while defenda