Cases

NUMBER 13-18-00432-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ CHRISTOPHER A. HUGHES, Appellant, v. DELTA LAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, Appellee. _________________________________________________

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-18-00432-CV Christopher A. Hughes v. Delta Lake Irrigation District On Appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas Trial Cause No. T-0380-14-C JUDGMENT THE THI

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Christopher A. Hughes appeals a May 7, 2015 judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York entered following a jury trial on Hughes’s First Amendment retaliation claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The jury determined that: (1) Hughes did not prove that defendants-appellants Town of Bethlehem (“Bethlehem”) and Police Chief Louis Cor-si retaliated against

OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs’ claims arise from Defendant’s allegedly unlawful banking practices. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 4) I. Plaintiffs Christopher Hughes and Carla Cressman opened checking accounts with Defendant TD Bank. To make purchases and withdraw funds from the

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-24-00453-CV Christopher HUGHES, Appellant v. Christina HUGHES, Appellee From the 216th Judicia

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00453-CV Christopher HUGHES, Appellant v. Christina HUGHES,

MOORE, Judge. Kenneth Cory Hughes (“Cory”) appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Mobile Circuit Court (“the trial court”) in his malicious-prosecution action against Christopher Allen Wallace (“Chris”). Because we find that genuine issues of material fact' exist as to whether Chris had probable cause to prosecute a criminal-harassment charge against Cray and whether Chris acted with malice in prosecuting that charge

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This case involves two airline pilots who have been charged with violating Florida criminal statutes prohibiting the operation of an aircraft while intoxicated. Prior to the commencement of the state criminal trial, and after making pre-trial motions in that case, the pilots filed the instant action in the United States District Court for the Southern

Spain, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered August 22, 2012, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. Defendant, a police officer with the Town of Bethlehem Police Department (hereinafter BPD), was placed on disability leave in 2009. As a result, he turned in — as required — his polic

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND Re: Dkt. No. 13 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge Before the Court is Hughes’ motion to remand this action to state court. Because the Court agrees that defendants have not met their burden to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million, the Court GRANTS Hughes’ motion to remand.

Spain, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered August 22, 2012, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. Defendant, a police officer with the Town of Bethlehem Police Department (hereinafter BPD), was placed on disability leave in 2009. As a result, he turned in — as required — his polic

36 So.3d 816 (2010) Christopher Martin HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D09-0028. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 26, 2010. William Kemper Jennings, Defuniak Springs, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. <

OPINION BY JUDGE WOJCIK Christopher Hughes petitions for review of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole's (Board) March 6, 2017 decision denying his request for administrative relief and affirming the Board's March 8, 2016 order recommitting Hughes as a convicted parole violator (CPV) and recalculating his parole violation maximum date. Appointed counsel, David Crowley, Esq. (

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. After Christopher J. Harris sold cocaine to an undercover officer at his residence, police obtained a search warrant and discovered cocaine and several firearms on July 17, 2013. Harris eventually pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). At sentencing,

232 S.W.3d 596 (2007) Christopher HUGHES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. 28130. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. August 27, 2007. *597 Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, for Appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen. and Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent. DANIE

Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In 1997, with enactment of Chapter 113 of the Laws of New Jersey, the Legislature granted to members of the public pension funds a “non-forfeitable right to receive benefits,” a right defined to mean that benefits could not be reduced once the right to them had attached. See N.J.S.A. 43:

Plaintiffs appeal from judgment entered after a jury verdict finding that plaintiff Jeffrey R. Hughes was injured, through the negligence of defendants, entitling them to recover $50,000.00 and from an order awarding costs. A new trial must be awarded. FACTS On 5 April 2002, plaintiffs (Mr. and Mrs. Hughes) filed a complaint against defendants (Webster and Bi-Lo) alleging negligence on the *Page 728 part of Webster as an e

863 A.2d 266 (2004) 2004 ME 141 STATE of Maine v. Terence J. HUGHES. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Submitted on Briefs: October 5, 2004. Decided: November 15, 2004. *267 R. Christopher Almy, District Attorney, C. Daniel Wood, Asst. Dist. Attorney, Bangor, for State. Terence J. Hughes, Orono, for

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Tina Walter (‘Walter”), Christopher Bayless (“Bayless”) and Eric Schumacher (“Schumacher”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have brought this purported class action lawsuit against their internet provider for supplying internet services that, they al

*487In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay the arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sacks, J.H.O.), dated December 22, 2005, which denied the petition. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently st