Cases

953 F.Supp. 232 (1996) Christopher HANLEY, Plaintiff, v. TRENDWAY CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, Defendant. No. 94 C 5406. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 26, 1996. *233 David L. Lee, Tomes, Lee & Dvorak, Chicago, IL, for Christopher Hanley. Fred E. Schulz, Wildman, Harrold

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 645 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 646 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

558 F.3d 204 (2009) KICKHAM HANLEY P.C., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN, an ERISA Plan; Trustee of the Kodak Retirement Income Plan; and Kodak Retirement Income Plan Committee, Defendants-Appellants. No. 08-4289-CV. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: December 11, 2008. Decided: February 26, 2009.

Cite as 2019 Ark. App. 485 Digitally signed by Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS Date: 2022.08.04 11:45:03 -05'00' Adobe Acrobat version: DIVISION II 2022.001.20169 No. CV-18-994 DAVID L. MCKIM Opinion Delivered: October 23, 2019

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2016 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER BROWN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 13-05989 J. Robert Carter, Jr., Judge No. W2015-00990-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 12, 2016 _____________________________ A Shelby County jury found the Defendant,

DAVIS, Judge. *359 This case involves a dispute regarding the entitlement of Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ("BOA") to enforce novations to three promissory notes executed by Defendant Christopher Harvey Rice ("Rice"). 1 BOA appeal

ACCEPTED 04-14-00735-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 2/20/2015 1:49:45 PM

08-4289-cv Kickham Hanley P.C. v. Kodak Income Retirement Plan 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2008 5 6 7 Argued: December 11, 2008 Decided: February 26, 2009 8 9 Docket No. 08-4289-cv 10 11 _________________________

STROUD, Judge. *451Defendant appeals orders denying his motions to compel arbitration. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. Background “No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself, and another to the multitude, without finally getting bewildered as to which may be the true.” Nathaniel Hawthorne, The Scarle

ORDER JAMES C. DEVER, III, Chief Judge. On January 29, 2010, George Cooper, Sr. (“Cooper Sr.”) and George Cooper, Jr. (“Cooper Jr”) filed a complaint asserting claims under federal and North Carolina law [D.E. 1], The complaint arises from a shooting that took place in Brunswick County, North Carolina on May 2, 2007, and the events leading to the shooting are hotly contested. Plaintiffs sued the Brunswick

Duffly, J. A jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff on claims that the defendants’ negligent operation of a tavern proximately caused the death of Thomas Christopher, who was struck by a car as he fled an altercation with patrons of the tavern that took place outside. BACKGROUND 1. Proceedings. The plaintiff sought recovery for wrongful death under G. L. c. 229, § 2. We construe

Reiber, C.J. ¶ 1. In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs Joseph and Judith Salatino appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to certify a limited-fund class action. Defendants David and Brianne Chase and Vermont Associates in Ophthamology appeal the court’s order requiring notice of the certification decision to the putative class members, the content of the notice, and the manner of giving notice. Plaintiffs appeal the

Opinion issued May 8, 2008 In The Court of Appeals For The

917 P.2d 1202 (1996) Christopher M. HOWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. No. A-5333. Court of Appeals of Alaska. May 31, 1996. *1203 David M. Seid, Assistant Public Defender, Ketchikan, and John B. Salemi, Public Defender, Anchorage, for Appellant. James L. Hanley, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Special

Order Granting Motion of City of Richmond for Judgment On The Pleadings, FRCP 12(c); Continuing Case Management Conference YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Plaintiffs Upstream Point Molate, LLC (“Upstream”) and the Guidiville Ranchería of California (“the Tribe”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendants the United States of America, Sally Jewell, Secretary

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. David Diersen filed a complaint against the Chicago Car Exchange (“CCE”), an automobile dealership, alleging that the CCE fraudulently furnished him an inaccurate odometer reading when it sold him a 1968 Dodge Charger, in violation of the Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act (“the Odometer Act” or “the Act”). 49 U.S.C. § 32701 et seq.

651 F.3d 404 (2011) Bruce H. MATSON, Trustee of the LandAmerica Financial Group, Incorporated Liquidated Trust, Trustee-Appellant, v. Diego ALARCON; Emily E. Anders; Bruce A. Avila; Annelise J. Braddock; Steven P. Baker; Mickey J. Barker; Michael Barlow; Dianne F. Bigbie; Frank E. Billings, Jr.; Rhonda L. Bitterman; John C. Bommarito; Nancy Boyer; Kimberly L. Coday; Shawn D. Cosman; Nancy DeAngelo; Belinda Duron; Tammy J. Elley; Lawrence M. Furlo

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. This appeal represents a lawyer’s nightmare. A sophisticated law firm, with what it thought was a sophisticated system to determine and calendar filing deadlines, missed a critical one: the 30-day time period in which to file a notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A). The rule, however, provides for a grace period of 30 days within which a lawyer in such a fix may ask the

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Christopher D. Wyant Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Wyant Law Office, LLC Attorney General of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana Frances Barrow David Steiner Deputy Attorneys General

HULL, Circuit Judge: These three consolidated appeals arise from a single prosecution involving health care fraud and violations of the Anti-Kickback laws regulating Alabama Medicaid, which is funded in part by the United States government. Defendant Jeff Vernon appeals his convictions on numerous grounds, including the district court’s denial of his motion for a judgment of a