⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Christopher David Wright”

State v. Wrightpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999-03-18 · Published · cited 6× · 1999 UT App 86; 977 P.2d 505; 1999 UT App 086; 365 Utah Adv. Rep. 15; 1999 Utah App. LEXIS 28; 1999 WL 144506
977 P.2d 505 (1999) 1999 UT App 086 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Christopher David WRIGHT, Defendant and Appellant. No. 981058-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 18, 1999. *506 Ronald W. Perkins, Farr Kaufman Hamilton Sullivan, Ogden, for Appellant. Jan Graham, Atty. Gen., Catherine M.
New York Court of Appeals · 2016-06-09 · Published · cited 62× · 27 N.Y.3d 516; 54 N.E.3d 1157
*518 OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge DiFiore. The issue presented by this appeal is whether it was an abuse of discretion to deny defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate his judgment of conviction without a hearing. We hold that the courts below were within their discretion to sum
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2016-04-01 · Published · cited 1× · 177 F. Supp. 3d 1310; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44499; 2016 WL 1317686
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. DOWDELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff James E. Wright brings this action against defendant Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (“BNSF”) pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et. seq., alleging an acute injury claim and a cumulative trauma claim. (Doc. 2). BNSF now moves for summary judgment on both of plaintiffs c
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012-01-04 · Published · cited 61× · 665 F.3d 560; 2012 WL 10929; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 55
665 F.3d 560 (2012) UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher G. WRIGHT, Appellant (No. 09-3467) Ravinder S. Chawla, Appellant (No. 09-3731) Andrew Teitelman. Appellant (No. 09-3965). Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731, 09-3965. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued September 21, 2011. Opinion filed: January 4, 2012.
Wright v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-05-02 · Published · cited 6× · 630 S.E.2d 656; 279 Ga. App. 155; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1446; 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 488
630 S.E.2d 656 (2006) 279 Ga. App. 155 WRIGHT v. The STATE. No. A06A0706. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 2, 2006. *657 Mary Erickson, Decatur, for appellant. David McDade, District Attorney, Christopher R. Johnson, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.
Wright v. Barnhartpublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005-07-05 · Published · cited 5× · 389 F. Supp. 2d 13; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19939; 2005 WL 2218261
389 F.Supp.2d 13 (2005) David WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 04-10336MBB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 5, 2005. *14 *15 Christopher Alberto, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for
State v. Wrightpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2009-03-26 · Published · cited 47× · 165 Wash. 2d 783
Sanders, J. ¶53 (dissenting) — “Fear and abhorrence of governmental power to try people twice for the same conduct is one of the oldest ideas found in western civilization.”18 ¶54 The State charged Oliver Wright and Dennis Bryant with second degree murder committed either as an intentional murder or a felony murder. Each man was tried, “r[a]n the gantlet”19
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001-07-09 · Published · cited 188× · 256 F.3d 679; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15389; 2001 WL 760641
TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. Glen Delaney, an inmate at Stateville Correctional Center in Illinois, filed this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging an Eighth Amendment violation for being denied all out-of-cell exercise opportunities for 6 months. The defendants, six guards and the prison warden, filed a motion for summary judgment asserting a qualified immunity defense. Dis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007-08-09 · Published · cited 51× · 496 F.3d 371; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18988; 2007 WL 2265622
496 F.3d 371 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dunyell Lasalle WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-10894. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 9, 2007. *372 Marc Woodson Barta (argued), Dallas, TX, David Lee Jarvis, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, TX, for U.S. Christopher Allen Curtis (
Wright v. Barnhartpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 175 F. App'x 361
PER CURIAM. The notice of appeal in this case appears to have been filed one day late. The appeal is therefore untimely. Even if the appeal were properly before us, it would fail for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Among other problems, the administrative law judge (ALJ) reasonably could have discounted the extreme limitations men
Wright v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005-03-23 · Published · cited 12× · 612 S.E.2d 576; 272 Ga. App. 423; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1034; 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 296
612 S.E.2d 576 (2005) 272 Ga. App. 423 WRIGHT v. The STATE. No. A04A2290. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 23, 2005. *577 Bruce Morriss, Daniel Shim, Morriss, Lober & Dobson, LLC, N.W. Atlanta, for appellant. David McDade, District Attorney, Pamela Brophy, Christopher Johnson, Assistant Distri
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003-09-29 · Published · cited 2× · 325 F. Supp. 2d 79; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25622; 2003 WL 23648292
325 F.Supp.2d 79 (2003) Albert WRIGHT and David Compas, Plaintiffs, v. Mark SANTOPIETRO, Defendant. No. CIV.3:00cv1745(AHN). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 29, 2003. David G. Toro, John R. Williams, Williams & Pattis, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiffs. Christopher Arciero, Marcia J. Gleeson, Sack, Spector & Karsten, West Hartford,
New York Supreme Court · 2006-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 14 Misc. 3d 907
OPINION OF THE COURT Larry M. Himelein, J. From 1808 until 1968, Cattaraugus County was governed by a Board of Supervisors, consisting of the supervisors of the 32 *908towns in the county and the 16 council members from the wards in the cities of Olean and Salamanca. After Baker v Carr (369 US 186 [1962]) and its progeny were decided, a la
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District CHRISTOPHER L. WRIGHT, ) ) Appellant, ) WD82948 ) v. ) OPINION FILED
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-11-14 · Published · cited 27× · 908 F.3d 884
BIBAS, Circuit Judge. In 2008, the U.S. government strove to rescue the collapsing economy. Its extreme measures helped many, but others suffered as a result. One of the rescue measures, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, authorized the government to act as conservator for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two government-sponsored enterprises with critical roles in the home-mortgage mar
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-08-20 · Published · cited 341× · 798 F.3d 475; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14654; 2015 WL 4939605
ROVNER, Circuit Judge. While David Gevas was imprisoned at the Henry Hill Correctional Center in Galesburg, Illinois, his cellmate stabbed him in the neck with a pen. Gevas filed a pro se complaint against three prison officials, alleging inter alia that they violated the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against cruel and unusual punishment
Illinois Supreme Court · 2010-10-21 · Published · cited 41× · 939 N.E.2d 389; 238 Ill. 2d 620; 345 Ill. Dec. 546; 2010 Ill. LEXIS 1537
939 N.E.2d 389 (2010) 238 Ill.2d 620 WRIGHT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, Appellee, v. John WALSH et al. (John Walsh, Appellant). No. 109463. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 21, 2010. *390 Terrence J. Sheahan, Michael T. Franz, Joseph D. Newbold, of Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, for appellant. <
California Supreme Court · 2018-03-05 · Published · cited 2× · 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 371; 4 Cal. 5th 467; 411 P.3d 548
CUÉLLAR, J. Like "cloud-capp'd towers," "gorgeous palaces," and perhaps someday even "the great globe itself," many arrangements endure for some time but eventually dissolve. 1 So too with certain law partnerships-including firms that are retained, before they dissolve, to handle matters on an hourly basis.