Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Christopher L. Ray”
Christopher Ray Countspublic domain
KITE, Justice. [T1] After a jury found Christopher Ray Counts guilty of aggravated burglary and kidnapping and found him to be a habitual criminal, the district court sentenced him to two concurrent life sentences. 1 Mr. Counts appealed and this Court affirmed the convietion. Counts v. State, 2012 WY 70, 277 P.3d 94 (Wy
Glenn v. L. Ray Calhoun & Co.public domain
ORDER SAM SPARKS, District Judge. BE IT REMEMBERED on the 8th day of January 2015, the Court held a hearing in the above-styled cause, and the parties appeared by and through counsel. Before the Court are OneBeacon America Insur■ance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment [# 56], Third Party Plaintiff, L. Ray Calhoun & Co., d/b/a Calhoun and Company, et al.’s Responses [## 63, 69],
Ray v. Swagerpublic domain
Per Curiam. This case is before us on remand from the Michigan Supreme Court. Previously, defendant Eric Swager appealed in this Court as of right, asserting that the trial court erred by denying his motion for summary disposition on governmental immunity grounds under the governmental tort liability act (GTLA), MCL 691.1401 et seq . In our prior opinion, we reversed the trial court's decision and remanded for entry of sum
Ray Wildman v. Medtronic, Incorporatedpublic domain
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: Ray Wildman contends that a Medtronic device implanted in his back to relieve pain did not last as long as the company promised. The result was an infection that required surgery and caused him to miss months of work. Wildman brought suit alleging breach of express warranty under Texas law. If this state-law claim would impose a
Hernandez v. Ray Domenico Farms, Inc.public domain
JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court. *701 ¶ 1 We accepted jurisdiction under C.A.R. 21.1 to answer a certified question of law from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado regarding how far back in time a terminated employee's unpaid wage claims can reach
State of Maine v. Christopher Raypublic domain
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2025 ME 29 Docket: Cum-24-43 Argued: October 9, 2024 Decided: March 20, 2025 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. CHRISTOPHER RAY LAWRENCE, J. [¶1] Christopher Ray appeals from an adjudication enter
Ray v. Allergan, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT’S RULE 59 MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (Docket No. 227), filed by Defendant Allergan, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Allergan”).1 For the reasons set forth below, DEFENDANT’S RULE 59 MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (Docket No. 227) will be granted. BACKGROUND 1. Fact
Christopher Ware v. Louisiana Department of Corrpublic domain
KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant Christopher Ware is an inmate in the custody of the Louisiana Department of Corrections and an adherent of the Rastafari religion. As a tenet of his religion, Ware took a vow to not cut or style his hair. In the ensuing years, Ware’s hair has formed into dreadlocks that fall past his shoulders. Department of Corrections grooming policies pr
Ray v. Ropes & Gray LLPpublic domain
ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STEARNS, District Judge. Plaintiff John H. Ray, III alleges that defendant Ropes & Gray LLP (Ropes) denied him promotion to a partnership in the law firm because of his African-American heritage and then retaliated against him when he complained of discrimination. Ray seeks damages against Ropes, several partners of the firm, and Joy Curtis, the firm’s
Ray, III v. Ropes & Gray LLPpublic domain
HOWARD, Chief Judge. John H. Ray III, at the time an associate at the Boston law firm of Ropes & Gray (“Ropes”), was informed in December 2008 that Ropes would not advance him for further consideration as a partner. Contending that the employer’s decision was the result of racial discrimination, and that Ropes retaliated against Ray in various ways after he filed a complaint w
Matter of Myla-Ray L. (Ryan L.)public domain
Matter of Myla-Ray L. (Ryan L.) (2021 NY Slip Op 04135) Matter of Myla-Ray L. (Ryan L.) 2021 NY Slip Op 04135 Decided on June 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure
Sherman Ray Meirovitz v. United Statespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 11-1887 ___________________________ Sherman Ray Meirovitz lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. United States of America
Christopher Ray Schultzpublic domain
*794 SCHWARTZMAN, Judge Pro Tem. Christopher Ray Schultz appeals from the summary dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND In December 2005, Schultz pleaded guilty to robbery and attempted rape wi
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Ray Rickmanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 8, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER RAY RICKMAN Appeal from the Circuit Court for McNairy County No. 4003-B J. Weber McCraw, Judge FILED APR 1 6 2020 No. W2019-00778-CCA-R3-CD Rec'd By Clerk of ty Wppellate Gourts The Defendant, Christopher Ray Rickman, pleaded guilty to the offense of possession with intent to deliver .5 grams or more of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled s
Barten, Christopher Raypublic domain
PD-0509-15 n o, li'at-o&mz-'Lft COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS * mavoa?A MAY 04 2^3 APPeALs COURT ^RECEIVEDIN OF CRMNAL APPEALS yq^TTJe^AbelAcostar^lerk »cx«s MAY 04 2015
Barten, Christopher Raypublic domain
509-/5 ORIGINAL £.A/ TUG COUffr" of C/?/kWl/./>9L BPf^ftL-S OF TFX/1S app*//c> nd en h f\?PeLLfl/s/rs PiTjrio/J fo$ piscr$e/oji//}fiY rgvizu) o f -fHe stare o r r&
Barten, Christopher Raypublic domain
. f1, oiW -ow ______i)_e._o.c.:.,~c.Je r-k_o_f_f_h_e.,_Lourf_) . . ~- "Z..J_-_,_,J~,___ _ __ ~---~--rrty_.nCJ.m.e.~tLC...ls:.}_s_BarkJ)_J:t l~2.Q6_q_i_. __Ll_ hod__s:e, J )n t.t ~ ;1\- r£,_ _ "-11'1Cil1.da r1> \J S_·t~a_r d.\ '1\j-C-~.J ~ ..W Jl}Jj D 0 ... (, .. o tL.._·'l~DL3 o ) Z,O)$' - r ___
State of Missouri v. Christopher Eric Huntpublic domain
PER CURIAM In the course of arresting a suspect on two pending felony arrest warrants for the manufacture of methamphetamine and child endangerment, a deputy sheriff made a forced entry into a residence and physically subdued and arrested the suspect. As a result of the arrest, the deputy was charged and convicted of three crimes: burglary for entering the residence with intent to
Barten, Christopher Raypublic domain
~his d~cum~ntcontains so~e-COU/?1 ° _f._ C. RII'Jl.LNA I,.._EJeE£8_1.. 5 RfG~~lp -D(., _I -ges .that ar~ of P?or quality _ll.u_S'_[U\L1_fa_tLS__ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS , · at the time of 1magmg. __c...ttu.~ c _-__ -N_o,_L/___ 119oo~r:______ MAY 04 2015 rJ'-
Christopher Ray Olivarez v. Statepublic domain
NO. 12-15-00107-CR NO. 12-15-00108-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS CHRISTOPHER RAY OLIVAREZ, § APPEALS FROM THE 3RD APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE