⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Christopher M. King”

King v. Kingpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2018-09-20 · Published · cited 2× · 342 F. Supp. 3d 1364
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE Anne King believed that her ex-husband, Corey King, was not doing his fair share in the care of their children. Frustrated, she vented on Facebook. Doc. 13 ¶ 14. That post led to her arrest. Ms. King alleges that her ex-husband and his friend, Trey Burgamy, were responsible for her unconstitutional arrest and thus she filed this action alleging claims pursuant to
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2013-06-27 · Published · cited 2× · 417 S.W.3d 1; 2013 WL 3226790; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 7861
OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In the primary question in this interlocutory appeal, we determine whether a state university’s cancer-treatment center waived sovereign immunity to a patient’s claims that she was injured by allegedly falling from a hospital bed after the nurse monitoring her care raised the upper side rails on the patient’s bed, but did
State v. Kingpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 775 S.E.2d 841; 2015 WL 5009871
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay: "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
State v. Kingpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0× · 776 S.E.2d 317; 2015 WL 5005907; 2015 N.C. LEXIS 721
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:
State v. Kingpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 774 S.E.2d 307; 2015 WL 4112520
Opinion *308The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of July 2015."
State v. Kingpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 775 S.E.2d 840
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant for Temporary Stay: "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015."
State v. Kingpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 775 S.E.2d 840; 368 N.C. 291; 2015 WL 5006147; 2015 N.C. LEXIS 737
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th of July 2015 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of August 2015." Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of July 2015 by Defendant in this matter fo
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2011-01-06 · Published · cited 27× · 329 S.W.3d 876; 2010 WL 4950546
329 S.W.3d 876 (2010) UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS M.D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER, Appellant, v. Vicki M. KING, Appellee. No. 14-10-00282. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). December 7, 2010. Rehearing Overruled January 6, 2011. *877 Bridget Lynn McKinley, Austin, for appellant. Bradley Landon Leger, Hou
State v. Kingpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015-06-02 · Published · cited 0× · 775 S.E.2d 36; 241 N.C. App. 399; 2015 WL 3490156; 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 434
BRYANT, Judge. Where there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that defendant was driving a vehicle while impaired, we affirm the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss. Because defendant failed to show how the jury was misled or misinformed as to the law of the case, we overrule defendant's argument for a new trial based on a denial of his request for an instruction on interested witnesses. O
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017-12-07 · Published · cited 12× · 240 So. 3d 1185
WALLER, CHIEF JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Christopher Pollan filed a medical negligence action against Dr. Andrew Wartak, North Mississippi Medical Center-West Point; Angie Turnage, LPN; Chase Larmour, RN; and Ashley Thomas, LPN, claiming that the defendants' medical negligence caused the death of his mother, Shirley Pollan. The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the defendants, finding that Pollan's surviva
King v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 6× · 818 S.E.2d 612; 304 Ga. 349
Blackwell, Justice. **349Albert Lee King was tried by a Twiggs County jury and convicted of murder and aggravated assault in connection with the death of Lelia Mae Huston. King appeals, asserting that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction for aggravated assault and that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. We affi
Deluca v. Kingpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016-04-29 · Published · cited 5× · 197 So. 3d 74; 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6559; 2016 WL 1718865
KHOUZAM, Judge. Anthony Deluca, Marcus Ladd, DLC CPA’s Strategic Advisors, LLC, and Delu-ca Ladd & Associates (collectively the De-luca and Ladd parties) appeal the order denying their motion for relief from judgment filed under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b). Because the Deluca and Ladd parties were not properly served, we reverse. Sharon King obtained a default judgment against De
Benitez v. Kingpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 21× · 298 F. Supp. 3d 530
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Henry Benitez ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se , commenced this action against a number of named and unnamed prison officials (collectively, "Defendants") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt.
King v. Burwellpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-06-25 · Published · cited 947× · 192 L. Ed. 2d 483; 135 S. Ct. 2480; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4248; 576 U.S. 473; 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 430; 83 U.S.L.W. 4541; 115 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2203
Chief Justice ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act adopts a series of interlocking reforms designed to expand coverage in the individual health insurance market. First, the Act bars insurers from taking a person's health into account when deciding whether to sell health insurance or how much to charge. Second, the Act generally requ
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-10-09 · Published · cited 9× · 769 F.3d 366; 72 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 890; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19295; 2014 WL 5064797
HIGGTNSON, Circuit Judge: Kernell Thaw (“Kernell”), the non-debt- or spouse of Stanley Thaw (“Stanley”), claims a homestead exemption in property held jointly with Stanley that is subject to a forced sale in Stanley’s bankruptcy proceedings. She contends that the sale is a taking under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution entitling her to just compensation. Be
State v. Kingpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010-05-18 · Published · cited 3× · 693 S.E.2d 168; 204 N.C. App. 198; 2010 N.C. App. LEXIS 797
693 S.E.2d 168 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher D. KING, Defendant. No. COA09-952. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 18, 2010. *169 Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III by Assistant Attorney General Catherine M. (Katie) Kayser, for the State. Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, Durham, for defendant-appellant.
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014-11-06 · Published · cited 1× · 150 So. 3d 702; 2014 Miss. LEXIS 548; 2014 WL 5768686
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CT-01914-SCT GLEN CONLEY v. CHRISTOPHER EPPS ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/01/2012 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. RICHARD A. SMITH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SUNFLOWER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: GLEN CONLEY (PRO SE) ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE O
California Supreme Court · 2018-08-23 · Published · cited 62× · 236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853; 423 P.3d 975; 5 Cal. 5th 1039
KRUGER, J. *855 *1046 By statute, California's workers' compensation system provides an injured employee's "exclusive" remedy against an employer for compensable work-related injuries. ( Lab
Indiana Supreme Court · 2025-03-18 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Mar 18 2025, 11:24 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014-11-25 · Published · cited 1× · 161 So. 3d 1098; 2014 Miss. App. LEXIS 681; 2014 WL 6647904
GRIFFIS, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. James Walter Creel appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. The trial court determined that Creel’s petition was a motion for post- *1099 conviction collateral relief (PCCR) and was proeedurally barred under'