Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Christopher N. Hernandez”
CHRISTOPHER HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEEpublic domain
11/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 13, 2020 CHRISTOPHER N. HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-70399 Royce Taylor, Judge No. M
People v. Hernandezpublic domain
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 30, 1997 (People v Hernandez, 240 AD2d 759 [1997]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 19, 1994. Ordered that the application is denied.
Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
WARREN, Justice. **895Christian de la Hernandez was convicted of malice murder, kidnapping, aggravated assault, kidnapping with bodily injury, and rape in connection with the shooting death of Jacqueline Ramon. On appeal, Hernandez contends only that venue did not properly lie in
Holmes v. Hernandezpublic domain
Order Honorable Edmond E. Chang, United States District Judge On October 12, 2014, Chicago Police Officer George Hernandez fatally shot Ronald Johnson III. R. 106, Third Am. Compl. ¶¶ 6, 8.1 Johnson’s mother, Dorothy Holmes, filed this lawsuit against the Chicago and Hernandez on her own behalf and as Special Administrator of her son’s estate. The parties are in the midst (tho
Hernandez v. Christopher Robin Academypublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated February 7, 2000, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed. The in
Opinion on rehearing issued March 31, 2011. In The Court of Appeals For The</
Hernandez v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BUCKLO, District Judge. Plaintiff Frank Hernandez (“Hernandez”) has brought a class action complaint against defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. (“Chase Bank”) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorgan”) alleging that they violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (“FCRA”). Hernandez has now moved to certify a class defined as
Hernandez v. Chase Bank USA, N.A.public domain
429 F.Supp.2d 983 (2006) Frank HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., Defendants. No. 05 C 5274. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 2, 2006. *984 *985 Daniel A. Edelman, James O. Latturner, Jeremy Patrick Monteiro, Edelman, C
Geoffrey Zimmerman, M.D. v. Wendy Gonzalez Anaya, Individually and A/N/F of Christopher Gabriel Hernandezpublic domain
May 07, 2010 Mr. Kendall M. Gray Andrews Kurth LLP 600 Travis, Suite 4200 Houston, TX 77002 Mr. Levon G. Hovnatanian Martin Disiere Jefferson & Wisdom LLP 808 Travis, Suite 1800 Houston, TX 77002 RE: Case Number: 08-0580 Court of Appeals Number: 01-07-00570-CV Trial Court Number: 2006-14198 Style: GEOFFREY ZIMMERMAN, M.D. v. WENDY GONZALEZ ANAYA, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F OF CHRISTOPHER GABRIEL HERNANDEZ, DECEASED Dear Counsel: Today the Supreme
Opinion issued June 5, 2008 Opi
In the Matter of the Paternity of E.H. Paul Bobby Hernandez v. Alvina Casillas and Paul Hernandezpublic domain
Pyle, Judge. [1] In this consolidated appeal, Paul Bobby Hernandez ("Father") appeals the trial court's order, which concluded that Alvina Casillas and Paul Hernandez ("Casillas and Hernandez") have standing to seek grandparent visitation of Father's adopted children, E.H. ("E.H.") and I.H. ("I.H.") (collectively "the children"). Concluding that Casillas and Hernandez do not have stand
People v. Hernandezpublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Michael L. Dwyer, J.), rendered October 23, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him followin
Hernandez v. Hernandezpublic domain
PER CURIAM. We affirm a temporary order modifying custody. On the record before the court, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s concluding, after fourteen hours of hearing, that it was in the best interest of the child to reside temporarily with the father. As to all issues raised, there is sufficient evidence to support this exercise of discretion. We note that there is no question here that Appellant had sufficient
Christopher James Hernandez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-24-00080-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CHRISTOPHER JAMES HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXA
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss. For the reasons stated *956herein, the Motions are granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are taken from Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
Ramirez-Hernandez v. Allied Building Productspublic domain
*********** The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms, the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Ledford.
State v. Hernandezpublic domain
689 N.W.2d 579 (2004) 268 Neb. 934 STATE of Nebraska, appellee, v. Victor HERNANDEZ, appellant. No. S-03-1365. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 10, 2004. *582 Christopher J. Lathrop, Omaha, for appellant. Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and James D. Smith, Lincoln, for appellee. HENDRY, C.J
Donald Christopher Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
FILE COPY OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 12/31/2014 COA No. 12-13-00044-CR HERNANDEZ, DONALD CHRISTOPHER Tr. Ct. No. 9952-A PD-1161-14 On this day, the appellant's pro se motion to appoint counsel has been denied.
Donald Christopher Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
FILE COPY OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 1/28/2015 COA No. 12-13-00044-CR HERNANDEZ, DONALD CHRISTOPHER Tr. Ct. No. 9952-A PD-1161-14 On this day, the Appellant's Pro Se petition f
Donald Christopher Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS FILE COPY P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 A 30O 1/28/2015 COANo. 12-13-00043-CR HERNANDEZ, DONALD CHRISTOPHER Tr. Ct. No. 9946-A