⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Christopher Ramirez Dolores”

Court of Claims of Illinois · 1995-07-10 · Published · cited 0× · 52 Ill. Ct. Cl. 99
ORDER Sommer, J. This is a claim for wrongful death due to alleged negligence of the State. It is presently before the Court on the Respondents motion to dismiss. Oral argument was heard by the Court on June 20,1994. The issue before the Court is whether the Claimant gave sufficient notice under section 22 — 1 of the Court of C
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985-09-06 · Published · cited 33× · 772 F.2d 223; 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 22779
PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Faustino Dolores, seeks review by this Court of the decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to deny his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings in order to enable him to apply for asylum or withholding of deportation. In the alternative, Dolores asks this Court to exercise its authority under 28 U.S.C.
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2018-03-19 · Published · cited 2× · 2018 CO 19
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the changes are announced. Click on the case number to v
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2024-07-18 · Published · cited 0×
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted; Memorandum Opinion filed July 18, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00950-CV IN RE REGENCY IHS OF BRENHAM, LLC, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 335th District Court
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 242 N.E.3d 88; 2024 Ohio 1436
[Cite as Toronto City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Ascent Resources Utica, L.L.C., 2024-Ohio-1436.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, TORONTO CITY SCHOOLS ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
California Court of Appeal · 2011-05-20 · Published · cited 27× · 195 Cal. App. 4th 996; 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 618; 124 Cal. Rptr. 3d 785
Opinion JOHNSON, J. Leena Areso appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary adjudication in favor of CarMax, Inc. (CarMax), in her class action lawsuit, which (among other causes of action) alleged violations of the Labor Code, including a failure to pay compensation for overtime. We affirm. BACKGROUND Areso began working for CarMax on June 23, 2004, as a sales consult
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 105× · 650 F.3d 350; 2011 WL 2207110
650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover
Nevada Supreme Court · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NV 6
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2023-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 23, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00033-CV ——————————— THE CITY OF LAKE JACKSON AND VELASCO DRAINAGE DISTRICT, Appellants V. RICKY ADAWAY, ROBERT ADEN, THOMAS ALBERS
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992-11-18 · Published · cited 6× · 808 F. Supp. 439; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17730; 1992 WL 365751
808 F.Supp. 439 (1992) Christopher OLEJAR v. POWERMATIC DIVISION OF DeVLIEG-BULLARD, INC., et al. No. 92-0150. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. November 18, 1992. John Shniper, Phoenixville, PA, for plaintiff. Thomas P. Wagner and Catherine H. Agnew, Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, PA, for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER<
in Re Amy Williamspublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00685-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
District Court, E.D. California · 2018-02-23 · Published · cited 2× · 291 F. Supp. 3d 1088
Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On April 22, 2016, plaintiffs, who are Latino1 citizens and registered voters in Kern County, commenced this action against the County of Kern, its Board of Supervisors, and other County officials (collectively, "defendants"), challenging Kern County's 2011 redistricting plan under § 2 of the Voting Rights Act,
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2012-05-21 · Published · cited 0× · 862 F. Supp. 2d 871; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70396; 2012 WL 1847446
ORDER LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 874 *874II. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND................................874 III. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND.....................................875 A. Schemes
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986-06-27 · Published · cited 49× · 794 F.2d 236; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26584
CONTIE, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Shamel Yousif seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. For the reasons which follow, we deny the petition, finding that the Board did not abuse its discretion.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001-07-18 · Published · cited 0× · 257 F.3d 1262; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15994
ANDERSON, Chief Judge: Mazen and Fedaa A1 Najjar, a husband and wife in consolidated deportation proceedings, appeal decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) order of deportation which denied their petitions for asylum, withholding of removal, and suspension of deportation under sections 208(a), 243(h) and 244(a) of the Immi
District Court, S.D. New York · 2010-12-30 · Published · cited 1× · 762 F. Supp. 2d 631
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT OF SPECIAL COUNSEL AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVENESS OF SETTLEMENT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: I conducted a hearing on December 22, 2010, to consider and regulate two issues necessary to be resolved to consummate the Affirmation of Final Settlement as provided by § XXII of the Settlement Process Agreement, As Amended (“SPA”): (1) the report by the Special Counsel
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
District Court, D. Hawaii · 2003-07-21 · Published · cited 0× · 272 F. Supp. 2d 1112; 2003 WL 21697345
272 F.Supp.2d 1112 (2003) Linda AKEE et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. 00-CV-382BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. July 21, 2003. *1113 *1114 *1115 *1116
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022-09-06 · Published · cited 37× · 47 F.4th 1278
USCA11 Case: 19-13926 Date Filed: 09/06/2022 Page: 1 of 104 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-13926 ____________________ ANTONIO GONZALEZ CARRIZOSA, et al., Plaintiffs, DOE 378, LUDY RIVAS BORJA, as da