Cases

Chung v Young (2020 NY Slip Op 07029) Chung v Young 2020 NY Slip Op 07029 Decided on November 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00362-COA RAE YOUNG CHUNG APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, EX REL. BRANDON APPELLEE POLICE DEPARTMENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/23/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: RANKIN COUNTY CIRCU

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTORS’ CLAIM OF EXEMPTION IN LIFE INSURANCE MELVIN S. HOFFMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. David M. Nickless, the chapter 7 trustee in this case, has objected to the claim of exemption of the debtors, Chung-I Liang and Yu-Chi Chao, in a life insurance policy owned by the debtor-wife, Yu-Chi Chao. On schedule B accompanying their bankruptcy petition, in which the debto

MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Plaintiff Eileen Dechberry (“plaintiff’) commenced this action, pro se, on April 2, 2014, against defendant, the New York City Fire Department (“FDNY” or “defendant”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment in a collective action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”), also involving supplemental claims under the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”). Plaintiffs, who are former waiters at a Manhattan restaurant called “Le Bateau Ivre,” operat

ORDER Dong Chung is a tenacious litigator. Pursuing a pro se discrimination lawsuit against her former employer, KPMG LLP, she quickly established a pattern of challenging nearly every ruling that didn’t go her way, requesting sanctions against the other party, and asking the court to justify its decisions more fully. Hearings were characterized by a tone of incivility, with Chung frequently accusing opposing counsel of fraud, allegin

LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellees, eleven Asian Americans currently or formerly employed as police officers by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port Authority”), sued the Port Authority under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging that they were passed over for promotions because of their ra

OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Alana Shultz filed this action against Congregation Shearith Israel of the City of New York, the Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue (the “Congrega*415tion”), Meir Soloveiehik, Michael Lustig, and Barbara Reiss (collectively, “Defendants”) on September 22, 2015. Shultz alleges that Defendants

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CT-00362-SCT RAE YOUNG CHUNG v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EX REL. BRANDON POLICE DEPARTMENT ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/23/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEWEY KEY ARTHUR TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: RICHARD POOLE NOEL, III GARRISON MICHAEL WHITE

Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge GINSBURG. GINSBURG, Chief Judge: Johnny Chung appeals a judgment dismissing his complaint against the Department of Justice for violation of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b), and against DOJ officials for violation of his constitutional rights. We affirm the dismissal of Chung’s constitutional claims because,

304 F.Supp.2d 1364 (2003) MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. John T. WOODALL, Defendant. No. 402 CV 120. United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division. August 21, 2003. *1365 *1366 Arnold C. Young, Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn, PC, Savannah, GA, Wil

MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER MUNSON, Senior District Judge. Currently before the court is the Government’s motion for an upward departure for defendant Suck Ho Han (“Han”), as well as its requests for enhancements to Haris base offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”). Han opposes the requests and the motion. After consideration of the record, including the evidence prod

JACOBS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Curtis Shannon, who worked as a bus driver, was found to be color-blind and asked to resign his position in lieu of termination. Shannon contends that he was constructively fired on the basis of a “regarded as” disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and of state and local disability discrimination laws. The United States Dist

332 F.3d 95 Curtis SHANNON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, a Public Benefit Corporation and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, a Public Benefit Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 02-7266. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 30, 2002. Decided: June 13, 2003

189 F.Supp.2d 55 (2002) Curtis SHANNON, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Defendants. No. 00 CIV 5079(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 25, 2002. *56 *57 Thomas & Associates, New York City (

OPINION CANBY, Circuit Judge. This case involves a dispute over a marine insurance policy. The plaintiffs, Ja-cinta Yu and Yu & AAS Corporation (“the Yus”), owned the fishing vessel “Liberty,” half of which was insured by defendant Albany Insurance Company. When the Liberty sank, the Yus submitted a claim to Albany. Albany denied the claim on the ground

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 23-1900 & 23-2043 _____________ RONALD KOONS; NICHOLAS GAUDIO; JEFFREY M. MULLER; GIL TAL; SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION INC; FIREARMS POLICY COALITION INC; COALITION OF NEW JERSEY FIREARM OWNERS; NEW JERSEY SECOND AMENDMENT SOCIETY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY A

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWIN HARDEMAN, Nos. 19-16636 Plaintiff-Appellee/ 19-16708 Cross-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 3:16-cv-00525-VC 3:16-md-02741-VC MONSANTO COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from

523 F.2d 811 Su-Chang HAUNG TANG, Plaintiff and Appellee,v.AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.Jaw-Mann JONG, also known as Chung Hao-Man and ChungChao-Man, Cross-Complainant and Appellant,v.AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut Corporation, etal., Cross-Defendants. No. 74-2611. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Sept. 29,