Cases

69 Cal.Rptr.3d 789 (2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 452 Cindy HAILEY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' SERVICE, Defendant and Respondent. No. G035579. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Three. December 24, 2007. *794 Jeffrey L. Garland, San Diego, and Michael G. Nutte

MEMORANDUM *** Manual A. Lopez (“Lopez”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) in favor of the defendants, Country Insurance & Financial Services, et al., (“CIFS”). Lopez asserted claims against CIFS under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a), 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985. He also alleged claims for breach of contract, wrongful discharge, bad faith, unfair labor pra

McAnany, J.: Butler County (County) appeals the district court’s decision (1) overturning the determinations of the appraised value of the taxpayer’s property by the Board of Tax Ap*200peals (BOTA) for the tax years 1999 and 2001, and (2) adopting the proposed findings of the taxpayer, Andover Antique Mall, L.L.C. (Andover). The County also appeals the district court jud

McKAY, Chief Judge. Appellants are all former employees of the Town of Pinedale, Wyoming. In May of 1988, Appellee Thomas Delgado was elected mayor and Appellees James McLel-lan and Harvey Pfisterer were elected as non-incumbent City Councilmen of the Town of Pinedale. Mayor Delgado was elected to a two-year term while Councilmen McLellan and Pfisterer were elected to four-year terms. During the campaign, Appellees promise

916 A.2d 553 (2007) Lynda CARROZZA v. Roy GREENBAUM, M.D., Radiology Affiliates of Central New Jersey, P.A., St. Agnes Medical Center, Kathryn A. Evers and Hahnemann University Hospitals, East, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences D/B/A Allegheny University Imaging Services, Hahnemann University Hospital, MIIX Insurance Company and Pennsylvania Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, Appeal of Pennsylvania Property and Ca

WARNER, J. Following a jury verdict against the defendant/appellant Dr. Duong in a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff/appellee moved for an award of fees pursuant to a proposal for settlement. Dr. Duong claims that the proposal was ambiguous and that it was an improper “all or nothing” offer which did not allow him to settle the claims of individual plaintiffs, contrary to Attorneys’ Title Insurance Fund v. Gorka, <

OPINION KEN WISE, Justice. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. In a cross-point, National American Insurance Company and Okie Foundation Drilling Co. conditionally appeal a separate order denying their alternative motion to compel arbitration among FisherBroyles, LLP and Russell DePalma. For th

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT HOANG DINH DUONG, M.D., RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF HOLLYWOOD, P.A. and TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Appellants, v. OLIVIA ZIADIE, as plenary guardian of the person and property of FRANCIS ZIADIE, incapacitated, PHILIP ZIADIE and PAUL ZIADIE, Appellees. No. 4

Opinion by Judge ROMAN. In this probate proceeding, petitioners, Nancy Olson and Joyce Hill, appeal the district court order denying their petition to vacate an order of intestacy requested by the personal representative, Alice Nugent, in favor of the heirs, Laurel Evarts, David Evarts, and Eileen Fayle. Eileen Fayle, an heir and the mother of petitioners, does not participate in this appeal. We vacate the or

[Cite as Scarapelli v. Young, 2019-Ohio-4880.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY AUGUST SCARPELLI et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EDWARD YOUNG et al., Defendants-Appellees.

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs John (“Paterek”) 1 and Cynthia Paterek (“the Patereks”), along with their company Paterek Mold & Engineering, Inc. (“PME”), (collectively “Plaintiffs”), appeal-the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants Ben Delecke, Commissi

499 F.3d 184 (2007) CGB OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, INC. d/b/a CGB Rehab, Inc. v. RHA HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; Symphony Health Services Inc.; RHA Pennsylvania Nursing Homes, Inc., d/b/a Prospect Park Rehabilitation Center d/b/a Prospect Park Nursing Center d/b/a Prospect Park Health and Rehabilitation Residence; RHA Pennsylvania Nursing Homes, Inc. d/b/a Pembrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center d/b/a Pembrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Residence

469 B.R. 647 (2012) In re OXFORD EXPOSITIONS, LLC. Oxford Expositions, LLC, Plaintiff v. Jason Hyland, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 10-16218-DWH. Adversary No. 11-01009-DWH. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi. April 20, 2012. *648 Craig M. Geno, Craig M. Geno, PLLC, Robert M. Frey, Ridgeland, MS, J. Hale F

439 F.Supp.2d 974 (2006) Tash HEPTING, et al, Plaintiffs, v. AT & T CORPORATION, et al, Defendants. No C-06-672 VRW. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 20, 2006. *975 *976 *977 *978 Cindy Arm Cohn, C

500 F.Supp.2d 1158 (2007) UNIEK, INC., Plaintiff, v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 06-C-311-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. June 18, 2007. *1159 *1160 Kendall W. Harrison, La Follette, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Madison, WI, for Defendant. OPINION A

754 F.Supp.2d 829 (2010) Noel BUTCHER v. SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, LLC. Civil Action No. 07-8136. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. November 1, 2010. *831 Thomas Carey Wicker, III, Capitelli & Wicker, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff. Robert Seth Reich, Lawrence R. Plunkett, Jr., Reich, Album & Plu

166 P.3d 161 (2007) In re the ESTATE OF E. Keith EVARTS, a/k/a, Keith Evarts, Deceased. Nancy Olson and Joyce Hill, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Alice Nugent, Personal Representative-Appellee, and Laurel Ann Evarts and David R. Evarts, Appellees. No. 05CA2319. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III. April 5, 2007. Certiorari Denied August 13, 2007.

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Creekside Crossing Home Sales, et al. appeal the December 20, 2007 Judgment Entry entered by the Coshocton County Court of Common Pleas, which entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Brent and Cindy Winegar, and judgment in favor of third-party defendant-appellee New Tech Builders, Inc. ("New Tech"), following a jury trial.<

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Clerk’s No. 262); and (2)Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (Clerk’s No. 263). A fairness hearing was held on January 21, 2016. Clerk’

*8ORDER (Final Judgment) TODD R. MATHA, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION The Court must determine whether the plaintiff maintained a property interest in her former position, as distinguished from employment in general, which rendered a disciplinary demotion constitutionally impermissible in the absence of minimum procedural due process prot