⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Cindy L. Temple”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ohio 1157
[Cite as Smith v. Cindy Lucky 7's, L.L.C., 2019-Ohio-1157.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) SHERNELL SMITH C.A. No. 29065 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2683-19 CINDY JOHNSON, Administratrix Ad Prosequendum and Administratrix of the estate of TONY JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Respondent, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION July 19, 2021 v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00854-CV Francis Campone and Sai Temple of Spiritual Healing, Inc., Appellants v. Steven Kline and Fay Kline a/k/a Phaedra Kline, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-15-004361, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 1996-06-26 · Published · cited 3× · 925 S.W.2d 756; 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 2557; 1996 WL 346318
925 S.W.2d 756 (1996) John T. McCLAIN and Cindy R. McClain Matl, Appellants, v. ELM CREEK WATERSHED AUTHORITY, Appellee. No. 03-95-00335-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. June 26, 1996. *757 Aaron L. Jackson, Jackson & Hemer, L.L.P., Austin, for Appellant. Mickey J. Blanks, Blanks, Greenfield & Rhodes, Temple,
S.L. v. A.L.public domain
Delaware Family Court · 1999-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 735 A.2d 433; 1999 Del. Fam. Ct. LEXIS 85
KUHN, J. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Petition for Emancipation filed on behalf of S.L. (hereinafter “Petitioner”), by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Daniel J. Munley, Esquire.1 Petitioner is seeking emancipation from her parents, Sh. and A.L. (hereinafter “Respondents”) so that Petitioner may legally contract for housing “as well as other nece
S.L. v. A.L.public domain
Delaware Family Court · 1999-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 735 A.2d 433
KUHN, J. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on a Petition for Emancipation filed on behalf of S.L. (hereinafter “Petitioner”), by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Daniel J. Munley, Esquire.1 Petitioner is seeking emancipation from her parents, Sh. and A.L. (hereinafter “Respondents”) so that Petitioner may legally contract for housing “as well as other nece
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-02-04 · Published · cited 4× · 2019 Ohio 328; 119 N.E.3d 436
TIMOTHY P. CANNON, J. {¶1} Before this court is an appeal taken by plaintiffs-appellants from a February 15, 2018 judgment entry issued by the Lake County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees. The judgment is affirmed. {¶2} This case emanates from the tragic shooting at Chardon High School on February 27, 2012, perpetrate
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990-04-03 · Published · cited 32× · 900 F.2d 412; 29 Fed. R. Serv. 1185; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792; 1990 WL 36258
BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by plaintiff-appellant Cindy Nickerson from an unfavorable jury verdict. Plaintiff had brought a product liability suit against G.D. Searle & Company (Searle) and Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation (Ortho), alleging that two distinct intrauterine devices (IUDs) manufactured by Searle and Ortho and used by plaintiff at different t
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00758-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS NO. 04-14-00758-CV 7/16/2015 5:06:58
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-14-00758-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS NO. 04-14-00758-CV 7/15/2015 9:38:17
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991-06-25 · Published · cited 3× · 820 P.2d 332; 169 Ariz. 468; 89 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 54; 1991 Ariz. App. LEXIS 147
169 Ariz. 468 (1991) 820 P.2d 332 Lance WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Honorable Sherry Hutt, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, EL ZARIBAH SHRINE TEMPLE, a fraternal organization; El Zaribah Temple Holding Corporation, an Arizona corporation; Imperial Council of the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, an Iowa corporation; John Does I
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1978-12-18 · Published · cited 35× · 576 S.W.2d 291; 1978 Mo. LEXIS 330
576 S.W.2d 291 (1978) Frank Kenneth GRAEFF, by his next friend Kenneth S. Graeff, Plaintiffs-Appellants-(Respondents), v. BAPTIST TEMPLE OF SPRINGFIELD, Defendant-Respondent, and Emmett M. Davis, Defendant-Appellant. No. 60507. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. December 18, 1978. *294 Thomas G. Strong, Springfield, for plai
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
Hicks v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-09-06 · Published · cited 0× · 281 Ga. App. 461; 636 S.E.2d 183; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2841; 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1132
SMITH, Presiding Judge. Willie Floyd Hicks was convicted by a Spalding County jury of aggravated assault. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals, asserting as error the general grounds and the admission into evidence of his statement to police. Finding no error, we affirm. 1. We first consider Hicks’s assertion of the general grounds. Construed to support the verdict, the evidence shows that Hic
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4519217 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/16/20
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-10-13 · Published · cited 0×
10/13/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 19, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. PATRICK DEAN ARMSTRONG Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 17-CR-101 M. Wyatt Burk, Judge ___________________________________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-05-12 · Published · cited 86× · 751 F.3d 1034; 2014 WL 1876270; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8823
OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Cipto Chandra (“Chandra”) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. After Chandra’s order of removal became final in 2005, he converted to Christianity. On March 9, 2009, Chandra filed an untimely motion to reopen on the basis that religiou
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-09-27 · Published · cited 1× · 244 So. 3d 772
PITMAN, J. Plaintiffs-Appellants Kary Carroll, individually and on behalf of the minor children "ZC" and "DC" (collectively, the "Carrolls"), appeal the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Allstate Insurance ("Allstate") and Randy B. Odom and Loretta Odom (collectively, the "Odoms"). For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS On April 13,
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-02-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00726-CV 4089429 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Erwin v. Russpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-06-01 · Published · cited 2× · 481 F. App'x 128
PER CURIAM: * Erwin, along with twenty-three other plaintiffs (collectively the “Plaintiffs”) sued Bryan F. Russ, Jr. and fifty-three other defendants (collectively the “Defendants”) for their roles in an alleged grand conspiracy involving a Texas state judge and Russ’ law firm (“The Firm”) that, according to the complaint, taints all litigation associated -with Russ’ law firm or filed in Robertson