Cases

MEMORANDUM * The Britton Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for relief from the judgment of dismissal entered two years earlier for failure to comply with case management orders in this multidistrict litigation. The Britton Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) because they did not

MEMORANDUM * The Britton Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for relief from the judgment of dismissal entered two years earlier for failure to comply with case management orders in this multidistrict litigation. The Britton Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(6) because they did not

WILSON, Circuit Judge: The City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System (“Southfield” or the “Investors”) appeals the dismissal of its consolidated class-action securities fraud complaint against the St. Joe Company (“St. Joe” or the “Company”) and St. Joe’s current and former officers for alleged violations of §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Roger Dale Syx and S.P. Richards Company appeal from the trial court's grant of a motion for a new trial. On December 22, 1999, Lowell Thomas Britton sued Syx, S.P. Richards Company, and Genuine Auto Parts, Inc., alleging negligence and wantonness arising out of an automobile accident occurring on January 5, 1998. At the time of the accident, Syx was employed by S.P. Richards Company, and Britton alleged in his complaint that S.P. Richards Company was owned by Genuine Auto Part

Chambers, J.* ¶1 Article I, section 10 of the Washington State Constitution declares, “Justice in all cases shall be administered openly, and without unnecessary delay.” Un*305der this straightforward directive, court records that become part of the administration of justice may be kept from the public only upon a showing of some compelling ne

Becker, J. ¶1 This accounting malpractice case settled before the trial court began to consider a pending motion for summary judgment and the sealed documents filed in support of it. Discovery documents that are initially designated as confidential pursuant to a protective order may be filed with the court under seal in connection with an anticipated decision by the court. To the extent they enter into the court’s decision-making

If the intestate sold grain within ten miles of the mill he broke the contract; for selling grain on commission is a form of dealing in grain, if "deal" is given its ordinary meaning. It is improbable that the words "in any way, form, or manner" would have been used if the sole purpose of the parties had been to prevent the intestate from selling grain at retail. These words tend to prove that the intestate was not to engage in any branch of the grain business, either on his own behalf or on

741 N.W.2d 136 (2007) Jean CLARK, individually and as trustee for the next of kin of Tina Grove, deceased, et al., Respondents, v. Roy Jorgen Munkholm PETERSON, et al., Defendants, Gordon Wheeler d/b/a Camp Ripley Store/Bar/Cafe and Krazy Rabbit, Appellant. No. A06-2006. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. November 13, 2007. *137

01/14/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 8, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM DARNELL BRITTON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2020-C-1395 Mark J. Fishburn, Judge _________________________________

PER CURIAM: Bobby Lee McArthur and Deborah E. McArthur appeal the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7), and denying the McArthurs’ motion for preliminary injunction as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McArthur v. Clark,

(2008) Marilyn CLARK, et al. v. COMCAST CORP., et al. Civil Action No. 08-52. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 25, 2008. MEMORANDUM BARTLE, Chief Judge. This is a putative securities class action brought on behalf of the shareholders of Comcast Corporation ("Comcast") against Comcast, its Chief Executive Officer,

FENNER, Judge. Byron Britton appeals from the order of the trial court denying his motion pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed) following an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Britton was convicted of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, first degree burglary and two counts of first degree robbery for which he received a total of 95 years’ imprisonment. Britton’s convictions were upheld on direct appeal in State v.

Melvin Mayfield, Judge. This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint which sought to prevent the annexation of territory to the City of Conway, Arkansas. The record shows that on October 3, 1989, a petition was filed in the Faulkner County Court by “Earl Rogers and Guy Murphy, et al. through their attorneys, Clark & Adkisson” seeking the annexation of certain d

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Meika DeSean Britton appeals the dismissal of his motion for post-conviction relief, in which he sought to set aside his Alford plea to one count of child solicitation.1 Because we find that a sufficient factual basis supports his voluntary plea and that his attorney was not ineffective in representing him, we affirm. B

GODBOLD, Chief Judge: This case concerns the claim of a habeas petitioner that the Allen charge, see Allen v. U.S., 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896), given to the jury at his trial for murder resulted in a coerced verdict of guilty and hence a mandatory life sentence. Because of a procedural default not excused by the required showing of cause and prejudice, we are barred from considering the

DONALD BRITTON, v. CHARLES (CHUCK) HUSTMYRE, LOUISIANA BUSINESS INCORPORATED, ROLFE McCOLLISTER, JR., MIKE ECKSTEIN, JULIO MELARA, 225BATON ROUGE, 225BATON ROUGE.COM. No. 2009 CA 0847. Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit. March 26, 2010. Not Designated for Publication. DONALD BRITTON, Baker, LA, Plaintiff/Appellant, Pro Se. A. JUSTIN OURSO III, CHRISTOPHER

[Cite as State v. Clark, 2024-Ohio-734.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 112810 v. : LAMONT CLARK, :

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. On January 25, 2016, Ste. Genevieve County Deputies Austin Clark ("Deputy Clark") and Matthew Ballew responded to a 9-1-1 report of gunshots from the vicinity of a rest area. When they arrived at the rest stop to investigate, the officers encountered Gregory Clark ("Gregory") seated at a table adjacent to the building. After calling in Gregory's identification, a brief, somewhat adversarial discus

NUMBERS 13-11-00173-CV; 13-11-00174-CV; 13-11-00175-CV & 13-11-00176-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG TRACE BRITTON ADAMS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 754 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 755 OPINION Case Summary