Cases

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Mc-Keighan, J.), rendered April 24, 2015, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted assault in the second degree. In satisfaction of a six-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted assault in the second degree. He was sentenced, as a second felony offender, in acc

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.), entered on or about April 16, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Each of the point assessments at issue was supported by clear and convincing evidence. The assessment for being armed with

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00293-CV Kara King, Mayor; Council Members Andrea Willott, Jon Cobb, Andrew Clark, Kevin Hight; and the City of Bee Cave, Appellants v. Bill Goodwin, Appellee FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-20-003394, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 14, 2022 NO. 03-21-00293-CV Kara King, Mayor; Council Members Andrea Willott, Jon Cobb, Andrew Clark, Kevin Hight; and the City of Bee Cave, Appellants v. Bill Goodwin, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRA

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-21-00293-CV Kara King, Mayor, Council Members Andrea Willott, Jon Cobb, Andrew Clark, Kevin Hight, and the City of Bee Cave, Appellants v. Bill Goodwin, Appellee FROM THE 353RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-GN-20-003394, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON,

OPINION SAM J. DAY, Justice. I. Introduction Appellant Dennis Clark Goodwin was arrested for assaulting a family member. Appellant was charged with enhanced family violence assault because of a prior conviction for assault on a member of his household. He was tried to a jury which found him guilty. The jury sentenced him to nine years in jail and a $5,000 fine. Appellant appeals the co

25 F.Supp.2d 713 (1998) James Richard GOODWIN, Jr. and the State of North Carolina, ex rel. James Richard Goodwin, Jr., Plaintiffs, v. Dale FURR, Sheriff of Richmond, Deputy Sheriff Brian Thorpe and Deputy Sheriff Larry Harrelson individually and in his official capacity, the County of Richmond, and Western Surety Company as surety, Defendants. No. 1:97CV01309. United States District Court, M.D. North

347 S.W.3d 800 (2011) C. Michael LUCAS, Appellant, v. James Jolly CLARK & Eonic Creations, Inc., Appellees. No. 03-10-00474-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. June 15, 2011. Rehearing Overruled August 25, 2011. *801 Barry K. Bishop, Clark, Thomas & Winters, PC, Austin, for Appellant. D. Todd Sm

MEMORANDUM * Following the denial of his Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law, San Bernadino City Police Officer Joseph Shuck (“Shuck”) appeals, arguing he is entitled to qualified immunity. Resolving, as we must, factual disputes in the favor of the nonmoving party, Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prod,., Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 150, 120 S.Ct. 2097, 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000); City Solutions,

*432OPINION Per Curiam: This is an appeal from an order of the district court reducing child support arrearages to judgment. The defendant-appellant claims that the district court should have dismissed the action because the district attorney had no authority to seek arrearages on behalf of an adult child who had not been the recipient of w

Josephine Linker Hart, Judge. Appellant, Stephen Goodwin, appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. For reversal, he argues that the Commission erroneously denied him temporary total disability benefits from 1993 to 1998, permanent total disability benefits, and an attorney fee. We conclude that appellant’s first argument was not preserved for appellate review. Further, we

People v Goodwin (2022 NY Slip Op 01254) People v Goodwin 2022 NY Slip Op 01254 Decided on February 24, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner Ian Orville Aken appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing as untimely his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Papa v. United States, 281 F.3d 1004, 1009 (9th Cir.2002),

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants entered upon sustaining their demurrer to plaintiff's amended complaint. The action is one instituted by plaintiff, the surviving wife of Leroy M. Clark, deceased, against the personal representatives of Jeremiah S. Goodwin, *Page 529 deceased, to obtain a judgment for twenty-five thousand dollars, the damage alleged to have been sustained by her by reason of the death of her said husband. The sole basis of

MEMORANDUM ** John Clark appeals pro se the district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his diversity action against Lawrence Harvey Zeiger aka Larry King, Cable News Network, LP, and Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., alleging defamation, libel, slander, assault and interference of judicial processes. For the reasons set forth in Judge Byrne’s order dated August 4, 2005, granting appellees’ motion

215 B.R. 710 (1997) In re John Carl GOODWIN, and Vicki Goodwin, Debtors. John Carl GOODWIN and Vicki Goodwin, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 93-29754-L, Adversary No. 97-0632. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. December 17, 1997. *711

[Cite as State v. Goodwin, 2018-Ohio-4377.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2017-P-0082 - vs - : PATRICK L.

384 F.Supp.2d 371 (2005) Sara CLARK and Seangagnon, Plaintiffs v. Steven WEBSTER, Defendant No. CIV.04-184-P-H. United States District Court, D. Maine. August 31, 2005. *372 Barbara L. Goodwin, Richard L. O'Meara, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, ME, for Sara Clark and Sean Gagnon, Plaintiffs. William R. Fisher, Thoma

Opinion by RONALD J. STUBBLEFIELD, Acting Presiding Judge: 11 This is a plaintiffs appeal from orders of the Trial Court entering judgment on jury verdict in favor of defendants, summarily adjudicating certain claims, and ruling on pre-trial motions in limine. Based on our review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 12 This

OPINION DEBEVOISE, Senior District Judge. I. BACKGROUND This case concerns allegations of deception and bad faith against a health insurance company, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). The heart of the complaint is that Prudential stopped selling a certain health insurance policy to new customers (“closing the block”), knowing that this would result