Cases

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered August 13, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injurie

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered August 31, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in part and reinstating the complaint, as amplified by the bill of particulars

442 S.E.2d 57 (1994) 114 N.C. App. 297 Beverly Dyanna CLARK, Administratrix of the Estate of Earnest Clark, Jr., Appellant, v. Irvin S. PERRY, M.D., and Forsyth County Hospital, Inc., formerly Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc., d/b/a Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Appellees. No. 9221SC314. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 19, 1994.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge To prevail on a claim under Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(6), a creditor must prove that the debtor deliberately and intentionally injured him by a willful and malicious act. Here, Michael Perry, who had a $2.8 million claim against Wallace Clark, one of the Debtors in this case, alleges that Clark del

MEMORANDUM ** Melanie Perry appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing her civil rights action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Zimmerman v. City of Oakland, 255 F.3d 734, 737 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm. The district court properly dismissed Perry’s action alleging con

*948MEMORANDUM * Appellant Melanie Perry appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Perry challenges the district court’s reliance on the domestic relations exception and the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. We affirm the conclusion of the district court on the alternative ground of Younger </

Lynch, J. Appeals (1) from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered May 5, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and (2) by permission, from an order of said court, entered August 21, 2015, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, without a hearing. Defendant

Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered June 23, 2014, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree. On June 23, 2013, defendant was arrested for falsely reporting an incident and, during a search incident to his arrest, was foun

Lynch, J. Appeals (1) from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered May 5, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and (2) by permission, from an order of said court, entered August 21, 2015, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, without a hearing. Defendant

Clark, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered June 23, 2014, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and falsely reporting an incident in the third degree. On June 23, 2013, defendant was arrested for falsely reporting an incident and, during a search incident to his arrest, was foun

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON EMMA B. CLARK, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Crockett Chancery No. 6878 ) FILED VS. ) Appeal No. 02A01-9704-CH-00080 ) March 19, 1998 RANDY J. PERRY, )

Order, Supreme *529 Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), entered on or about January 23, 2013, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexual offender and sexual predator pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs. The court properly assess

PER CURIAM. Appellee’s motion filed September 26, 2014, seeking dismissal of the appeal as premature is hereby GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED. BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

671 F.3d 1052 (2012) Kristin M. PERRY; Sandra B. Stier; Paul T. Katami; Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. Harris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge This case arises out of Plaintiff Henry Perry’s inability to obtain lifetime retiree health benefits after working for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) for seventeen years. Defendants IBT and the Teamsters Benefit Trust (TBT) maintain that Plaintiff was not eligible for lifetime

41 So.3d 355 (2010) Frank L. PERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D10-1374. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 23, 2010. *356 Frank L. Perry, pro se, Petitioner. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PE

10 So.3d 695 (2009) Terry PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D07-5871. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 22, 2009. *696 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Richard M. Summa, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy

218 P.3d 95 (2009) 347 Or. 110 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Justin Clark PERRY, Petitioner on Review. (CC 03-06-33108; CA A125135; SC S055142). Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 5, 2008. Decided October 1, 2009. *96 Daniel J. Casey, Portland, argued the cause

207 P.3d 1185 (2009) 2009-NMCA-052 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clark PERRY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 26,842. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. April 7, 2009. *1188 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Andrea Sassa, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee. Hugh W. Dangler, Chi

Case: 14-41127 Document: 00512802898 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/14/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 14, 2014