Cases

258 F.3d 720 (8th Cir. 2001) SHELLY REIMER; RICHARD DUYSEN; CHERYL RASMUSSEN; CARLA MYRUM; SHERYL ROESLER; LINDA FUGLEBERG; BETTE J. NELSON; LYNNE HONRUD; ELLEN LODIN; DALE HAROLD MYRUM; CAROL J. BUTH; VICKY PALLUCK; MARIANNE P. KALIN; JOAN L. SHEPEL; TAMARA JO COOK; YVETTE R. JOHNSON; BELINDA SCHMIDT; LISA PUKLICH; MURRAY MOEN; DEBORAH J. ANDERSON; JULIE KAY BUTH; LYNETTE JENSEN; JUDY REHDER; CONNIE BRUSE; DEEDRA A. WHALEN; JOHN FREEMAN; SHARON R.

BYE, Circuit Judge. The appellants, a class of plaintiffs consisting largely of nurses, filed a civil action against their hospital employer, Dakota Heartland Health Systems, for wage claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 206 et seq. Following-lengthy pretrial proceedings, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The district court2 granted summary judgment to Dakota

NEUMANN, Justice. [¶ 1] Champion Healthcare Corporation, Paracelsus Healthcare Corporation (collectively “Champion Healthcare”), and Dakota Medical Foundation (“Dakota Medical”) appeal from the district court’s order granting class certification under Rule 23, N.D.R.Civ.P. We remand with instructions. I [¶ 2] On November 1, 1996, Sister Colette Werlinger, and others similarly situated

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-2413 ___________ Shelly Reimer; Richard Duysen; * Cheryl Rasmussen; Carla Myrum; * Sheryl Roesler; Linda Fugleberg; Bette J.* Nelson; Lynne Honrud; Ellen Lodin; * Dale Harold Myrum; Carol J. Buth; * Vicky Palluck; Marianne P. Kalin; * Jo

October 27, 2006 Ms. Kathleen Marie Kennedy Benckenstein, Norvell & Nathan, L.L.P. P.O. Box 551 Beaumont, TX 77704-0551 Ms. Debra Ibarra Mayfield Rymer Moore Jackson & Echols, P.C. 2801 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 250 Houston, TX 77056 RE: Case Number: 06-0201 Court of Appeals Number: 12-05-00111-CV Trial Court Number: 2003-328 Style: MARGARET PARKER AND JIMMY HARVILLE, BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF SIDNEY HARVILLE, A MINOR v. SHANNAN WEAVER BARE

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Joan Roe 1 , a student athlete recruited for the field hockey team at Saint Louis University, and her parents brought this case under Title IX, a federal statute banning discrimination on the basis of sex in federally funded educational programs, and Missouri state law. Roe claims deliberate indif

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CLAUDETTE D. VOGEL, TRUSTEE OF No. 81123 THE VOGEL FAMILY TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 25, 2016, Appellant, vs. FILED THE MARLA BAY PROTECTIVE , ASSOCIATION; 610 LAKESHORE LLC, DEC 1 7 2021 A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA CLAUDETTE D. VOGEL, TRUSTEE OF No. 81123 THE VOGEL FAMILY TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 25, 2016, Appellant, vs. FILED THE MARLA BAY PROTECTIVE , ASSOCIATION; 610 LAKESHORE LLC, DEC 1 7 2021 A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY

EDMONDSON, J. €1 This is an appeal from a judgment entered after a non-jury trial in a mortgage foreclosure proceeding. We hold the value of the property exceeded the amount due on the mortgage and no waste was present, but the district court's finding that the Kirks breach ed the contract for deed is not against the clear weight of the evidence on the MeGinni-tys' claims of failure t

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 19-3010 _______________ EZAKI GLICO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a Japanese Corporation d/b/a Ezaki Glico; EZAKI GLICO USA CORP., a California Corporation, Appellants v. LOTTE INTERNATIONAL AMERICA CORP.;

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 19-3010 _______________ EZAKI GLICO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a Japanese Corporation d/b/a Ezaki Glico; EZAKI GLICO USA CORP., a California Corporation, Appellants v. LOTTE INTERNATIONAL AMERICA CORP.;

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 19-3010 _______________ EZAKI GLICO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a Japanese Corporation d/b/a Ezaki Glico; EZAKI GLICO USA CORP., a California Corporation, Appellants v. LOTTE INTERNATIONAL AMERICA CORP.; LO

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 19-3010 _______________ EZAKI GLICO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a Japanese Corporation d/b/a Ezaki Glico; EZAKI GLICO USA CORP., a California Corporation, Appellants v. LOTTE INTERNATIONAL AMERICA CORP.; LO

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 19-3010 _______________ EZAKI GLICO KABUSHIKI KAISHA, a Japanese Corporation d/b/a Ezaki Glico; EZAKI GLICO USA CORP., a California Corporation, Appellants v. LOTTE INTERNATIONAL AMERICA CORP.; LO

490 F.Supp.2d 184 (2007) NORTHWEST BYPASS GROUP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-CV-00258-JAW. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. June 4, 2007. *185 *186 Gordon R. Blakeney, Jr., Concord, NH, for Plaintiffs. Daniel R. De

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PAULEY, District Judge. Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Milos Vavra (‘Vavra”) and Leon Fischer (“Fischer”) (together, the “Heirs”) move pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to certify a defendant class comprised of six subclasses. The subclasses consist of private individuals, museums, art dealers and others involved with artworks that were par

MEMORANDUM ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. Before me is the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, to which the defendant has stipulated. The larger issue, however, is what my role as a federal judge should be in this litigation. The plaintiffs, several children who need special education and their parents or guardians, challenge Pennsylvania’s administration of the Divisio

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIM MUNIZ, No. 11-17282 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:09-cv-01987- CW UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge. I. STATEMENT OF FACTS In this acrimonious, complex, and prolonged lawsuit, the parties have filed dueling motions for sanctions. The Court reviews the factual and legal backdrop of these motions, denies the Plaintiffs’ motion, and defers final ruling on the motions of the Defendants and Intervenors. The Co

655 N.W.2d 60 (2002) 2002 ND 209 Dale HILTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NORTH DAKOTA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION; Claudia Albers, Michael Barnhart, Bart Brackin, Julie Curren, Wade Curren, Tim Erhardt, Janet Fagerland, Harold Fass, Lynette Fitterer, Judy Fryslie, Fayette Harrison, Jane Jacobson, Remae Kuehn, Milissa Meckle, Chad Rolandson, Duane Schmidt, Carole Sherwin, Dave Sherwin, Walter Wolf, and Kiley Yates, individually