Cases

233 S.W.3d 441 (2007) THE CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant, v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC., Appellee. No. 14-07-00084-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). July 31, 2007. Rehearing Overruled September 13, 2007. *442 Bertrand L. Pourteau, II, Houston, for appellant. Bradley Eugene MCain, Scott Jame

Affirmed and Opinion filed July 31, 2007 Affirmed and Opinion filed July 31, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of A

June 30, 2006 Mr. Bertrand L. Pourteau II Senior Assistant City Attorney P.O. Box 1562 Houston, TX 77251-1562 Mr. Scott James Conrad SettlePou 3333 Lee Parkway, Eighth Floor Dallas, TX 75219 Mr. Michael D. Hudgins The Hudgins Law Firm 24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1707 Houston, TX 77046 RE: Case Number: 04-0406 Court of Appeals Number: 14-03-00022-CV Trial Court Number: 2002-48557 Style: THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC. Dear Counsel:

826 F.Supp.2d 1271 (2011) The OUTDOOR CHANNEL, INC., Plaintiff, v. PERFORMANCE ONE MEDIA, LLC, d/b/a In Country Television, a New York Limited Liability Company; and Robert J. Sigg, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 10-CV-30-JHP-PJC. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. October 7, 2011. *1274 Rachel Blue, Richard Parker

435 F.3d 219 Malinda HEERWAGEN, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, Clear Channel Entertainment, Inc., Clear Channel Radio, Inc., and Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.No. 04-0699-CV. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued November 3, 2004.

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, a putative class representative, brought this civil antitrust action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sprizzo, J.), charging violations of § 2 of the Sherman Act against defendants Clear Channel Communications, Inc., et al. Plaintiff initiated suit on June 13, 2002 seeking damages and injunctive relief. She amended her complaint two month

311 F.Supp.2d 1048 (2004) NOBODY IN PARTICULAR PRESENTS, INC., Ogden Resurrection Project, Inc., Swank Management, Inc., and N.I.P.P., LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., SFX Entertainment, Inc., d/b/a Clear Channel Entertainment, Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc., Jacor Broadcasting of Colorado, Inc., Citicasters Co., Citicasters Licenses, Inc., and Tsunami Communications, Inc., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01 N

*1057ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc. (“Gamo USA”) [Docket No. 182] and Industrias El Gamo, S.A. (“Gamo Spain”) [Docket No. 183]. The motions are fully briefed and ripe for disposition. I. BACKGROUND1

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 12312-VCS AFFIRMED.

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 12312-VCS AFFIRMED.

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 12312-VCS AFFIRMED.

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 12312-VCS AFFIRMED.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 18, 2016 Session CLEAR WATER PARTNERS, LLC v. CHARLES E. BENSON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 190254-2 Clarence E. Pridemore, Jr., Judge ___________________________________ No. E2016-00442-COA-R3-CV – Filed January 26, 2017 ________________________________

Proceedings: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Dkt. 14, filed August 31, 2015) The Honorable CHRISTINA A. ■ SNYDER I. INTRODUCTION On June 10, 2015, plaintiffs California Outdoor Equity Partners, LLC, AMG Outdoor Advertising, and J. Keith Stephens (collectively, “plaintiffs”) filed suit against defendant City of Los Angeles (“the City”) alleging that the City’s restrictions on off-s

WALLACE, Chief Judge: The continuing efforts of cities to eradicate what they perceive to be a visual blight and safety hazard has resulted in billboard litigation raising complicated constitutional and statutory claims. This case is no exception. Hoping to obviate the need for constitutional adjudication, we certified a question to the Supreme Court of Arizona, which accepted the task of determining whether the sign codes b

OPINION ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge. ¶ 1 In this special action, the State of Arizona challenges the respondent judge’s order remanding real party in interest L.N. to the juvenile division of the Pima County Superior Court after the state sought to prosecute him as an adult on felony charges. The respondent judge found the state did not sustain its burden of e

377 F.Supp.2d 1178 (2005) ACTION OUTDOOR ADVERTISING JV, L.L.C., a Georgia limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF SHALIMAR, FLORIDA, Defendant. No. 3:03CV459/MCR. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. March 29, 2005. *1179 David H. Flint, Mark W. Forsling, Schreeder Wheeler & Flint LLP, Atl

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 27, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00295-CV SIDETRADE, INC., Appellant V. HIGHRADIUS CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas

997 F.2d 604 62 USLW 2037 OUTDOOR SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation; Milton Lee,Trustee for the Danny O. Lee Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant.OUTDOOR SYSTEMS, INC., an Arizona corporation; Milton Lee,Trustee for the Danny O. Lee Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation, Defendant-Appell

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs are self-described “street preachers” who brought this lawsuit in the district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin the defendants’ alleged violations of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ on the Rose Quarter Commons, an outdoor area next to city-owned public facilities in the city of Portland. Only the Oregon Arena Corpo