Cases

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice. Vincent G. Garcia appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of BNSF Railway Company. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTUAL SUMMARY On June 20, 2008, Garcia filed suit against BNSF under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA) a

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

02-09-281-CV

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00281-CV ANDREW L. NELOMS, JR. APPELLANT V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING. .It is insisted in the motion for rehearing -that “there was no evidence whatsoever offered or introduced, showing or tending to show, that the defendant, Southern Pacific Company, at the time of the alleged injury, or of the commencement of this suit, or at any time since and up to the present time, had or owned,, or has held or owned, or now has, holds, or owns,

OPINION BY SHOGAN, J.: Appellant, Colleen M. Krauss, Executrix of the Estate of Henry M. Krauss (“Decedent”), appeals from the orders granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees General Electric Company (“GE”); Georgia-Pacifíc, L.L.C.; CBS Corporation-Westinghouse (“Westinghouse”); Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Zurn Industries; and Trane U.S. Inc., fik/a American Standard (“American St

2022 IL App (1st) 211486 No. 1-21-1486 Opinion filed December 20, 2022 SECOND DIVISION ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILL

CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Shirley Mertz (“Mertz”) appealed from a district court order granting summary judgment dismissing her survival action filed on behalf of the estate of her husband, Allen Mertz, seeking to recover damages for alleged asbestos-related injuries from numerous asbestos manufacturers, distributers and sellers (“Defendants”). I would affirm, concluding the discovery rule does not toll the accrual of a surviva

Nos. 03-785L, 04-1456L, 04-1459L, 04-1463L, 04-1465L, 04-1467L, 04-1469L, 04- 1471L, 04-1472L, 04-1473L Filed: April 16, 2019 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WARREN S. BERES, et al., * * Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Strike; Plaintiffs, * Cross-Motions for Partial Summary v.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT __________ No. 97-4122/98-1081EM __________ Rockwood Bank, * * Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

DAWSON, District Judge. Roekwood Bank appeals following a judgment in a defamation action brought by a bank employee after the president of the bank made certain statements about the employee to bank examiners during routine bank examinations. The employee, M. Michael Gaia, who had been demoted by the bank, sought other employment and was listed as the proposed president within th

70 Wn. App. 491 (1993) 857 P.2d 283 NORTHLAKE MARINE WORKS, INC., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ET AL, Respondents. No. 29357-5-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. July 6, 1993. William J. Bender, Christine Lamson, and Skellenger, Bender, Mathias & Bender, for appellant. Mark H. Sidran, City A

79 Md. App. 591 (1989) 558 A.2d 768 POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY v. DORIS J. SMITH, ET AL. No. 1395, September Term, 1988. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 8, 1989. Kevin J. McCarthy (Catherine A. Cronin and McCarthy, Bacon, Costello & Stephens, on the brief) Landover, for appellant. Paul D. Bekman, Scott R. Scherr, Bal

[J-28-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. BRAD LEE HEROLD, AS EXECUTOR OF : No. 22 WAP 2023 THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM L. HEROLD : : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court entered v.

This is an action on two identical life insurance policies, each insuring the life of O.E. Pack in the sum of $1000. Plaintiff, the wife of insured, was named beneficiary. There was a judgment for plaintiff in the aggregate sum of $2338.84, from which defendant appeals. It is insisted that the appeal should be dismissed for the reason the statement contained in appellant's brief does not comply with our rules. The statement is longer than necessary and gives more prominence to t

518 U.S. 727 (1996) DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC., et al. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al. No. 95-124. United States Supreme Court. Argued February 21, 1996. Decided June 28, 1996.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM

The appellee recovered a judgment against appellant for $30,000, damages sustained by him on account of a personal injury which he alleges was caused by appellant's negligence. The appellant is engaged, among other things, in the manufacture and sale of lumber, and owned a number of railroad cars. The appellee was employed by it. When his injury was received, the appellee was engaged in dismantling some of the railroad cars for the purpose of salvaging the material therein. In order to

BISTLINE, Justice. Dawson Enterprises, Inc., an Illinois corporation authorized to do business in Idaho, hereinafter referred to as Dawson, is the stockholder of Dawson Ramsey Motor Sales, the General Motors franchise holder located on Main Street in Ketchum. Deeming the existing location outmoded, Dawson acquired an option to purchase the subject property, a 12.8 acre site located about 2V2 miles north of the city limits of

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10