Cases

567 F.3d 971 (2009) Sharon R. CLEVENGER, Appellant, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Appellee. No. 07-3447. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 18, 2008. Filed: June 4, 2009. *972 Eugene Gregory Wallace, argued, Buies Creek, NC, Anthony W. Bartels, on the brief, Jonesboro, AR, for a

977 F.Supp. 776 (1997) Dale CLEVENGER v. Shirley CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security. Civil Action No. 93-470-A. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. June 10, 1997. *777 Margaret A. Restucher, Barkan & Neff, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff. Lyman E. Thornton, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baton Rouge, LA, for Defe

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-3447 ___________ Sharon R. Clevenger, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court fo

734 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) Corliss Larsen BAUER, Plaintiff, v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. Civil No. 08-6088 (RHK/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. August 24, 2010. *776 Corliss Larsen Bauer, Lino Lakes, MN, pro se. Lonnie F. Bryan, United States Attorney's Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Defendan

375 F.Supp. 821 (1974) Myrtle V. CLEVENGER, Plaintiff, v. Caspar W. WEINBERGER, Secretary, United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant. No. 73CV357-W-2. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D. April 22, 1974. *822 Arthur M. Mellott, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff. Sheryle L. Randol, As

189 Cal.App.2d 658 (1961) 11 Cal. Rptr. 707 CATHERINE M. CLEVENGER, Respondent, v. EARL J. CLEVENGER, Appellant. Docket No. 18983. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. March 3, 1961. *662 Marvin C. Hix for Appellant. Sidney N. Brandis for Respondent. TOBRINER, J.

McKAY, Circuit Judge. This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This is an appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court upholding, for the most part, the Internal Revenue Service’s de

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Emilia Pietromonaco (“Emilia”) appeals from the Tax Court’s decision that she was ineligible for relief from tax liability under the “innocent spouse” provision, 26 U.S.C. § 6013(e) (1990). 1 Emilia contends that she was “innocent” within the meaning of the provision and that she should have

OPINION McNULTY, District Judge: The plaintiff, Jeffrey Heffernan, a veteran police officer in the City of Paterson, was demoted following a report that he had picked up a lawn sign from a campaign worker for a mayoral candidate. Heffernan has made a number of claims, but the one that best fits the evidence is that the Defendants,1 his employers, believed Heffernan had engaged in

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER delivered the opinion of the Court. In New Jersey and elsewhere, no one can procure a life insurance policy on a stranger's life and receive the benefits of the policy. Betting on a human life in that way, with the hope that the person will die soon, not only raises moral concerns but also invites foul play. For those reasons, state law allows a policy to be procu

455 F.Supp.2d 302 (2006) Reuben GLASS, et al, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-6320. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 10, 2006. *303 *304 *305 *306

OPINION OF THE COURT Rosenblatt, J. In this child support proceeding, we hold that a man who has mistakenly represented himself as a child’s father may be estopped from denying paternity, and made to pay child support, when the child justifiably relied on the man’s representation of paternity, to the child’s detriment. We reach this conclusion based on the best

331 S.C. 398 (1998) 503 S.E.2d 191 Eddie Wayne ELDRIDGE, Charles Louis Beaudrot, Russie Beaudrot Young, Bernard H. Padgett, Homer Charles Walker, and Ray F. Stewart, Individually and on behalf of a Class of Plaintiffs similarly situated, and Herbert Malcolm Crum, Individually and on behalf of a Class of Plaintiffs similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF GREENWOOD, Greenwood County, and the South Carolina Highway Departm

Opinion of the court filed by Circuit Judge DYK; Dissenting opinion filed by CircuitJudge RADER. DYK, Circuit Judge. James Barney and Michael Hanseman (“appellants”) appeal the Court of International Trade’s decision denying them attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, on the ground that they were not “prevailing parties.” We hold that parties who secure a cons

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GAJARSA, in which Circuit Judges MICHEL, PLAGER, CLEVENGER, SCHALL, BRYSON, and DYK join. Opinion concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge RADER, in which Chief Judge MAYER, Circuit Judge PAULINE NEWMAN, Senior Judge ARCHER, and Circuit Judge LOURIE join. DECISION GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. Larry Raney appeals from arbitra

DYK, Circuit Judge. This case involves a dispute between Telecare Corp. (“Telecare”) and the government as to Telecare’s liability under the Medicare Secondary Payer statute, Social Security Act § 1862, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1395y. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that Telecare was liable as a secondary payer. We affirm.

824 P.2d 783 (1992) The STATE of Colorado, By and Through the COLORADO STATE CLAIMS BOARD OF the DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yvonne E. DeFOOR; Frank Bowen; Margie Bowen; Elinor M. Butenhoff; Urs Frei; Michael Hatton; the Estate of Anna Hayes, Deceased; the Children and Estate of Arlene Johnson, Deceased; Estate of John Killeen, Deceased; Estate of Markus Lang, Herbert Lang, as survivor, heir and personal representative of

1 F.3d 1252NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. William C. YEARGAN, Petitioner,v.OFFICE OF PERSON

481 N.W.2d 165 (1992) 240 Neb. 149 STATE of Nebraska, on Behalf of the Minor Child J.R., Appellee, v. Jose MENDOZA, Appellant. No. S-89-494. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 6, 1992. *167 Kevin Ruser, Grand Island, for appellant. Gary E. Lacey, Lancaster County Atty., James P. Rocke, Douglas D. Cyr,

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge. Robert S. Belcher appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which affirmed a Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision denying Mr. Belcher’s claim for benefits based on a psychiatric disability. See Belcher v. West, No. 97-1374, slip op. at 8, 1999 WL 503950 (1999). We dismiss the appeal for lack of ju