Cases

ORDER Sharon Ramey claimed that chronic pain prevented her from working and applied for disability insurance benefits, but the ALJ disbelieved her account of the severity of her pain. On appeal Ramey challenges the ALJ’s adverse credibility determination. Because that determination was flawed, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case for further proceedings. Background Ra

ORDER Sharon Ramey claimed that chronic pain prevented her from working and applied for disability insurance benefits, but the ALJ disbelieved her account of the severity of her pain. On appeal Ramey challenges the ALJ’s adverse credibility determination. Because that determination was flawed, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand this case for further proceedings. Background Ra

PER CURIAM: In one of several appeals arising from an ill-fated real estate investment, Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s judgments in favor of the non-arbitrating defendants. 1 Because Plaintiffs have not shown that the district court erred in declining to stay the litigation pending the arbitration of some parties

Sognier, Judge. In City of Roswell v. Davis, 255 Ga. 158 (335 SE2d 582) (1985), the Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this court in Davis v. Ramey, 174 Ga. App. 417 (330 SE2d 130) (1985). Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this court and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Judgment aff

Been, Presiding Judge, dissenting in part. In order to impose liability upon the City of Roswell under 42 USC § 1983, three requirements must be met: (1) The City intentionally and deliberately instituted or authorized a policy or custom; (2) Which was corrupt or impermissible; and (3) Which “caused” Officer Ramey to violate the plaintiff’s constitutio

JUSTICE MARQUEZ delivered the opinion of the Court. T1 We granted certiorari review to consider whether two citizen-initiated proposed ordinances regarding the design and construction of a state highway entrance to the City of Aspen are administrative in character and therefore outside the scope of the initiative power reserved to the people under article V, sections 1(1) and 1(9) of the Colorado Constitution

559 F.Supp. 837 (1982) Joseph Barrett RAMEY, O.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al.,[*] Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-2128. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 26, 1982. Stephen Daniel Keeffe, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Joan M. Wilbon, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants. <

463 A.2d 709 (1983) Charles L. CLIFFORD and Mildred L. Clifford v. Patricia J. KLEIN. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued May 11, 1983. Decided July 26, 1983. *710 Murray, Plumb & Murray, Peter L. Murray (orally), Jane E. Barry, Portland, Thomas W. Tavenner, Boothbay Harbor, for plaintiffs. Eaton, Glass, Marsano &a;

MURDOCK, Justice. Pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R. App. P., this Court granted Clifford Goodman Wright ("Wright"), the administrator of the estate of Mary Evelyn Wright, deceased, permission to appeal from an interlocutory order of the Cleburne Circuit Court ("the trial court"). In that order, the trial court ruled that the $100,000 cap on damages set out

535 S.E.2d 727 (2000) 207 W.Va. 662 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Tod J. KAUFMAN, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, Petitioner, v. Honorable Paul ZAKAIB, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, the Kanawha County Commission, and George B.W., Respondents. No. 27327. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted April 11, 2000.

133 N.J. 1 (1993) 626 A.2d 1073 RAYMOND LESNIAK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. JOHN BUDZASH, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND DANIEL J. DALTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY ELECTION FOR STATE SENATE, 24TH DISTRICT, A/K/A KAMIN V. DAGGETT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Arg

The information contains three counts. The first charges appellant with keeping, and being concerned in keeping, and knowingly permitting to be kept a house, building, edifice and tenement for prostitution, where prostitutes were permitted to resort and reside for the purpose of plying their vocation. The second count charges that appellant kept and was concerned in keeping and knowingly permitted to be kept the said house, building, edifice and tenement for prostitution where prostitutes wer

339 S.W.3d 206 (2011) Steve HUMPHRIES, Appellant, v. ADVANCED PRINT MEDIA, Appellee. No. 05-10-00031-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. March 23, 2011. *207 Clifford L. Weinstein, Law Offices of Clifford I. Weinstein & Associates, Plano, TX, for Appellant. Jason Lewis Wright, Denton, TX, Jeffrey D. Shelton, Wright

128 F.3d 77 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1849,73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,289Mark ABDU-BRISSON; Ronald H. Buchner; Gordon Burgess;Robert Burke; Thomas D. Callahan; Thomas F. Carey; DaleE. Carman; Louis Carrara; T. Barry Casey; Lamar Cason;Robert T. Cassidy; Robert Changery; Larry E. Chappel;Richard Charbonneau; Stanley Checkoway; Douglas S.Christensen; Lee J. Church; James Cirilli; Robert Clack;Walter M.

679 S.E.2d 310 (2009) STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Kathryn KUTIL and Cheryl Hess, Petitioners v. Honorable Paul M. BLAKE, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court of Fayette County, and the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, Respondents. No. 34618. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted March 11, 2009. Decided June 5, 2009.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 578 {¶ 1} In this insurance-coverage dispute, the insured claims coverage. Unsurprisingly, the insurance companies disclaim any coverage. {¶ 2} Plaintiff-appellant, the city of Sharonville, and third-party defendants-appellants, Michael Schappa, James Cramer, and Wi

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J. This case impels us to define more clearly the regulatory framework within which local boards of education and municipal governing bodies must exercise their respective responsibilities for developing and adopting an educational budget for the public schools. This process also directly implicates the role of the Commissioner and State Board of Educatio

239 F.3d 456 (2nd Cir. 2001) MARK ABDU BRISSON, RONALD H. BUCHNER, GORDON BURGESS, ROBERT BURKE, THOMAS D. CALLAHAN, THOMAS F. CAREY, DALE E. CARMAN, LOUIS CARRARA, T. BARRY CASEY, LAMAR CASON, ROBERT T. CASSIDY, ROBERT CHANGERY, LARRY E. CHAPPEL, RICHARD CHARBONNEAU, STANLEY CHECKOWAY, DOUGLAS S. CHRISTENSEN, LEE J. CHURCH, JAMES CIRILLI, ROBERT CLACK, WALTER M. CLARK, PHILIP CLAUDY, HAROLD T. CLEAVER, CHARLES CLEMENTS, RICHARD T. CLOUGH, LAWRENCE

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia ex rel. Rachel E. Romano, Harrison County Prosecuting Attorney, Petitioner, FILED November 20, 2019 released at 3:00 p.m. vs) No. 19-0448

232 P.3d 222 (2009) Curtis VAGNEUR and Jeffrey Evans, Petitioners-Appellants, v. CITY OF ASPEN, State of Colorado; Kathryn Koch, in her official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Aspen; Karen Goldman, in her official capacity as Administrative Hearing Officer; Les Holst; Clifford Weiss; and Terry Paulson, Respondents-Appellees. No. 08CA2552. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.