Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Cole Robert Arthur”
Cole v. Statepublic domain
587 S.E.2d 314 (2003) 263 Ga. App. 222 COLE v. The STATE. No. A03A0946. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 16, 2003. *315 Daniel K. Franck, Robins, for appellant. A. Robert Tawse, Jr., Solicitor-General, Arthur J. Creque, Assistant Solicitor-General, for appellee. RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.
Kaung v. Cole National Corp.public domain
884 A.2d 500 (2005) Thomas T.S. KAUNG, Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, v. COLE NATIONAL CORPORATION, A Delaware Corporation Defendant-Below, Appellee. No. 480, 2004. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted March 30, 2005. Decided July 5, 2005. John L. Reed (argued), Thomas P. McGonigle, Matt Neiderman, of Duane Morris, L.L.P., New Castle, DE, for appellant
Arthur B. Roberts v. Robert Baileypublic domain
OPINION GARY R. WADE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SHARON G. LEE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, JEFFREY S. BIVINS, and HOLLY KIRBY, JJ., joined. The plaintiffs filed suit against the defendants to settle a boundary dispute. During the litigation, the defendants, who had for years enjoyed
Cole v. Chevron USA, Inc.public domain
(2007) ROBERT L. COLE; LILLIE R. ASH; JESSIE M. HAYNES; JOYCE M. LOFTIN; DORETHA S. HICKS; RENNETE McKNIGHT; RANDY BEESLEY; CHARLES WILLIAMS; SHELIA A. BOOTH; BERTIE W. DAVIS; MARGARETT COLEMAN; MARY REVETTE; JANET REVETTE; BRENDA JOHNSON; PATTY McDONALD; DEBORAH A. MADISON; LELA M. HALL; SHARRON BUCHANAN; EARNESTINE FORTENBERRY; DENISE MIKELL; JAMES ARRINGTON; DERITT P. LOPER; WILLIE WOULLARD; LATOYNA Y. RICHARDSON; GLORIA L. BUXTON; MILEHARMAR DODSON;
Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.public domain
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: We are asked to decide whether patients who suffered no injuries but who were subject to the off-label use of a medical device for eye surgeries may bring suit solely because the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) status of the device was not disclosed to them. The Third Amended Complaint (“the Complaint”) does not st
Hildes Ex Rel. David & Kathleen Hildes 1999 Charitable Remainder Unitrust v. Arthur Andersen LLPpublic domain
OPINION LUCERO, Circuit Judge: David Hildes appeals from a district court order denying leave to amend his complaint. Hildes sought to add a claim under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77k, against former outside directors of Peregrine Systems, Inc. (“Peregrine”). The district court concluded that amendment would be futile because t
Hill v. Colepublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by D’ANNUNZIO, J.A.D. The issue is whether a condominium developer who has sold at least 75% of the condominium units is entitled to vote its remaining units in an election of the governing board of the condominium association. The facts are not in dispute. The Ocean Club Condominium Association (Association) is the “entity responsible for the administratio
Robert Yates v. Municipal Mortgage & Equitypublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge FLOYD and Judge ANDERSON joined. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: This case involves claims that Municipal Mortgage & Equity (“MuniMae” or the “Company”), and certain of its officers and directors (collectively, the “MuniMae defendants”), viola
Nelson-Cole v. Borg-Warner Security Corp.public domain
881 F.Supp. 71 (1995) Patience NELSON-COLE, Plaintiff, v. BORG-WARNER SECURITY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 94-1931 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 6, 1995. *72 John M. Bredehoft, Elaine C. Bredehoft, and Linda G. Hill of Charlson & Bredehoft, Reston, VA, for plaintiff.
Loran Cole v. State of Floridapublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2024-1170 ____________ LORAN COLE, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. August 23, 2024 PER CURIAM. Loran Cole is a prisoner under a sentence of death for whom a warrant has been si
Cole v. Walhoutpublic domain
*887OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR DISMISSAL AND/OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MILES, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of the financial difficulties and eventual bankruptcy of Tucker Freight Lines, Inc. (“Tucker”). Plaintiffs are former employees of Tucker who entered into wage deferral contracts to save the company from its e
McGee v. Colepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, Chief Judge. Pending before the Court is a motion by Defendant Vera J. McCormick to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 26), a motion by Defendant Karen S. Cole to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 31), and a motion by Intervenor Defendant the State of West Virginia to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 34). Also pending are a motion by Defendant McCormick and Defendan
Robert Lee Jones v. State of Alabamapublic domain
REL: December 16, 2022 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Arthur West v. Loretta E. Lynchpublic domain
KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: The Constitution limits our “judicial Power” to “Cases” and “Controversies,” U.S. Const, art. Ill, § 2, cl. 1, and there is no justiciable case or controversy unless the plaintiff has standing, Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 102, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998). To stave off dismissal for
Cole v. Pekin Insurancepublic domain
JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, Guy E. and Kerry Cole, appeal the dismissal of their complaint against defendant, Pekin Insurance Company, and raise the following issues for review: (1) whether the physical contact requirement is an impermissible limitation on the uninsured motorist statute and is contrary to legislative intent and public polic
Rel: March 24, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TERM,
Eric Lovett v. Marshall Steven Cole, Jr.public domain
FILED 05/24/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE Clerk of the AT KNOXVILLE Appellate Courts
Ralph Salas v. Marshall Steven Cole, Jr.public domain
FILED 05/24/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE aaa AT KNOXVILLE Appellate Courts April 17, 2019 Session ERIC LOVETT ET AL. Vv. MARSHALL STEVEN COLE, JR. ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Roane County No. 2016-81 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor No, E2018-00719-COA-R3-CV AND RALPH SALAS ET AL. Vv. MARSHALL STEVEN COLE, JR." Appeal from the Chancery Court for Roane County No. 2016-133 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor No. E2018-01082-COA-R3-CV Ei
Robert Greer v. Strange Honey Farmpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0213p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ROBERT GREER, JEFFREY RIEMER, JANE BARKER, │ TUCKER GOODMAN, DOLORES
Arthur Diamond v. Pennsylvania State Education Apublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 19-2812 and 19-3906 ARTHUR DIAMOND, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated; JEFFREY SCHAWARTZ; SANDRA H. ZIEGLER, on behalf of themselves others similar situated; MATTHEW SHIVELY; MATTHEW SIMKINS; DOUGLAS R. KASE;