Cases

PER CURIAM. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Morrell v. Nat’l Health Investors, Inc., 876 So.2d 580, 580-81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (dismissing the appeal because a non-party to the proceedings below may not participate in appellate review). DISMISSED. DAVIS, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

949 N.E.2d 1195 (2011) CITIZENS STATE BANK OF NEW CASTLE, Appellant (Defendant and Cross-claim Plaintiff below), v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a America's Wholesale Lender, Appellees (Plaintiff below), and Federal National Mortgage Association and Steuben County Treasurer, Appellees (Cross-claim Defendant below). No. 76S03-1009-CV-515. Supreme Court of Indiana. June

922 N.E.2d 655 (2010) CITIZENS STATE BANK OF NEW CASTLE, Appellant-Defendant/Cross-Claims Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., d/b/a America's Wholesale Lender, Appellee-Plaintiff, Federal National Mortgage Association and Steuben County Treasurer, Appellees/Cross-Claims Defendants. No. 76A03-0909-CV-423. Court of Appeals of Indiana. March 5, 2010.

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. The Court has under consideration the Findings, Conclusions, & Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge on Bank of America, NA., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Petition, filed August 19, 2

640 F.Supp.2d 942 (2009) Frederic M. GAWRY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07 CV 322. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. July 6, 2009. *947 Nicholas A. Dicello, Dennis R. Lansdowne, Stuart E. Scott, Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, Cleveland, OH, Russel

706 F.Supp.2d 1029 (2009) Tarrance CHAMPLAIE, Plaintiff, v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. S-09-1316 LKK/DAD. United States District Court, E.D. California. October 22, 2009. *1036 Margaret Mary Broussard, Law Office of Margaret M. Broussard, Antelope, CA, Jonathan Gregg Stein, Law Offices of Jonathan

ORDER VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Defendant Bank of America’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. # 33), which was filed on January 18, 2012. Pro se Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. # 40) on February 1, 2012. The Court grants the Motion for the reasons that follow. I. Back

November 26, 2019 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 41 333 Conn. 769 NOVEMBER, 2019 769 Cenatiempo v. Bank of America, N.A. CARMINE CENATIEMPO ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (SC 20150) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magist

137 S.W.3d 457 (2004) L. Joseph GARR, III, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., Appellant/Cross-Respondent. No. SC 85578. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. July 1, 2004. *458 Duane L. Coleman, St. Louis, MO, Richard L. Martin, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Kevin L. Fri

Opinion BEDSWORTH, Acting P. J. This appeal, after a successful demurrer for misjoinder, tests the limits of California’s permissive joinder statute, section 378 of the Code of Civil Procedure.1 There are no less than 965 plaintiffs *241listed in the caption of the third amended complaint. Strictly speaking, though,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT • WILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS, United States District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) [DE 86], filed *1316herein on December 14, 2015 by Defendants Bank of America Corporation (“BoA”), Bank of America, N.A, C

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: On December 13, 2011, the City of Miami brought three separate fair housing lawsuits against Citigroup, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo. Each alleged that the bank in question had engaged in a decade-long pattern of discriminatory lending by targeting minorities for predatory loans. The complaints in each case were largely identical, each identifying the

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The City of Miami has brought an ambitious fair housing lawsuit against Bank of America, 1 alleging that it engaged in a decade-long pattern of discriminatory lending in the residential housing market that caused the City economic harm. The City claims that the bank targeted black and Latino custo

THOMPSON, Associate Judge: Appellants, Robin Floyd and Priscilla Fuller, appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing, for lack of standing, the action they brought pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Pro-*249teetion Procedures Act (the “CPPA”).1 Although we conclude that the allegations of appellants’ Amended Compla

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge Cook County (“the County”) alleges that Defendants-eollectively referred to as “Bank of America” or “BOA” for purposes of this opinion—discriminated against African American and Hispanic borrowers in violation of the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. BOA has moved to

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: * Anita Scott appeals a summary judgment entered on her claims relating to the foreclosure sale of her house. Because Scott has identified no genuine dispute as to a material fact, we affirm. I. ■ Scott was in default, and Bank of America, N.A., held the deed of trust. On November 9, 2011, the bank sent Scott a letter regarding the Home Aff

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND LEAVE TO AMEND MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, alleging Defendants’ failure to perform, under the parties’ Mortgage Loan Purchase and Servicing Agreement, proper mortgage servicing on multiple pools of mortgage loans sold by Defendants to Plaintiff Encore Bank, N.A. (“Encore”), is a motion t

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-12-00477-CV NO. 09-13-00004-CV _________________ JULIE JOHNSON, Appellant V. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee _________

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. This case concerns rescission procedures and the calculation of attorneys’ fees under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). On November 16, 2006, appellant Wilson Iroanyah closed on two separately documented loans. Appellee Tayldr Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corporation (TBW) loaned Wilson $192,000 (first loan) and $86,000 (second loan). Wilson and his wife, a