Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Colleen Alexis Barnes”
MARIO W. v. Kaipiopublic domain
265 P.3d 389 (2011) MARIO W., Petitioner, v. The Honorable Thomas KAIPIO, Commissioner of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Commissioner, State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest. Bradley W., Petitioner, v. The Honorable Thomas Kaipio, Commissioner of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, In and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Commissioner, State of Arizona,
United States v. Diazpublic domain
TSOUCALAS, Judge: Defendants-appellants Nelson Luis Millet, Manuel E. Roman, Richard Morales, Hector Luis Rios, Maria Vidro, Johnny Zapata, Robert Burgos, Francisco Soto (“F.Soto”), Alexis Antuna, Luis Noel Cruz, Edgar Rodriguez (“E.Rodriguez”), Edward Calderon and Gilberto Rivera (“G.Rivera”), appeal from judgments entered, following jury trials or plea agreements, in the United States District Court for the District of Con
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
United States v. Diazpublic domain
176 F.3d 52 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jose DIAZ, also known as Jolly; Jesse Rodriguez, also knownas J-1, also known as Jesse M. Rodriguez; Jose Rodriguez,also known as Baby Latin, also known as Rambo; JulioVasquez; Jose Melendez, also known as Little; DennisMillet, also known as Denise Mikan; Carlos M. Rodriguez,also known as Jesus; Edgardo Ortiz, also known as Eddie,also known as Mad Dog, also know
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
OKLAHOMA CHAP. OF AMER. ACA., PEDIAT. v. Fogartypublic domain
366 F.Supp.2d 1050 (2005) OKLAHOMA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS (OKAAP), et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael FOGARTY, Chief Executive Officer of the Oklahoma Health Care Authority (OHCA), et al., Defendants. No. 01CV0187-CVE-SAJ. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. March 22, 2005. *1051
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW EAGAN, Chief Judge. Introduction Plaintiff Oklahoma Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (“OKAAP”) is a non-profit professional organization of pediatricians and pediatric specialists. Plaintiff Community Action Project of Tulsa County, Inc. (“CAPTC”) is a non-profit organization located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The individual nam
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
McConnell v. Federal Election Commissionpublic domain
251 F.Supp.2d 176 (2003) Senator Mitch McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. National Rifle Association of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Emily Echols, a minor child, by and through her next friends, Tim and Windy Echols, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Chamber of Commerce of the United
Glass v. Commissionerpublic domain
NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th