Cases

OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: Before us are identical issues raised in two appeals from orders granting summary judgment to Defendants 1 in nuisance actions filed by Plaintiffs. 2 We affirm. The relevant facts are as follows. The Dagostin family

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* JEFF and JAMIE NICHOLS, legal * Representatives of a minor child, * No. 08-654V CARSON NICHOLS, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * Petitioners, * * v. * * File

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-486 No. COA21-97 Filed 21 September 2021 Wake County, No. 20 CVS 10656 AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Petitioner, NORTH CAROLINA PROVIDER OWNED PLANS, INC., d/b/a MY HEALTH by HEALTH PROVIDERS, Intervenor, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent, and WELLCARE OF N

20-1185-cv NY State Teamsters v. C&S Wholesale Grocers In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 20-1185-cv NEW YORK STATE TEAMSTERS CONFERENCE PENSION AND RETIREMENT FUND, by its Trustees, Michael S. Scalzo, Sr., John Bulgaro, Daniel W. Schmidt, Tom J. Ventu

491 F.Supp.2d 136 (2007) Donald C. HUTCHINS, Plaintiff v. CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 04-30126-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 1, 2007. *137 Eric H. Chadwick, Randall T. Skaar, Scott G. Uhbrich, Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A. Minneapolis, MN, William E. Coughlin, Colleen

456 F.Supp.2d 196 (2006) Donald C. HUTCHINS, Plaintiff v. CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 04-30126-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 29, 2006. Donald C. Hutchins, Longmeadow, MA, pro se. Paul H. Rothschild, Bacon & Wilson, P.C., Springfield, MA, Randall T. Skaar, *197 Sc

321 F.3d 83 Bonnie CICIO, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Carmine Cicio, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.John DOES 1-8, Defendants,Vytra Healthcare, and Brent Spears, M.D., Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 01-9248. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: June 20, 2002. Decided: February 11, 2003.

343 B.R. 754 (2006) In re Richard Paul GLUNK, Debtor. Daniel H. Fledderman and Colleen M. Fledderman, CoAdministrators of the Estate of Amy Marie Fledderman, Plaintiffs, v. Richard Paul Glunk, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-31656, Adversary No. 05-700. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 12, 2006. *755

676 F.Supp.2d 116 (2009) HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Kathryn EINHORN, as Executrix of the Estate of Claire A. MEHRING, deceased, Kathryn Einhorn, individually, Christopher Mehring, Edmond Mehring, and Maureen Curran, Defendants. No. CV 04-2738(ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 30, 2009. *117<

*397 Opinion KATZ, J. In this certified appeal we must decide whether, when breach of a fiduciary duty has been alleged, the burden to prove fair dealing by clear-and convincing evidence shifts to the defendant in cases that do not involve claims of fraud, self-dealing or conflict of interest. We conclude that unless the allegation involves su

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

240 S.W.3d 524 (2007) FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox News, Inc., Fox News Network, Inc., Fox News Network, L.L.C., Fox News Holdings, Inc., and Bill O'Reilly, Appellants v. Gamal ABDEL-HAFIZ, Appellee. No. 2-06-353-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. November 15, 2007. *528 Charles L. Babcock,

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

181 Cal.App.4th 414 (2010) 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 590 LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents; CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. No. B213703. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four. January 27, 2010.

674 F.Supp. 623 (1987) Michael BARKMAN, individually and on behalf of all the others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WABASH, INC., Kearney-National, Inc., Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation, K-N Holdings, Inc., John Moran, Bushrod Burns, Jr., Richard Donovan, William Boyd, Jack Hosler, E. Robert Thomas, Jr., Frank E. Peters, Jr., Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., and Blyth Eastman Paine Webber, Inc., Defendants. No. 85 C 611.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 9, 2024 Decided February 6, 2024 No. 23-3228 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. DONALD J. TRUMP, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:23-cr-00257-

382 F.Supp.2d 989 (2004) In re SPIEGEL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 02 C 8946. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 8, 2004. *990 *991 *992 *993 *994

MEMORANDUM BLAKE, District Judge. On June 21, 2002, a consolidated and renewed motion for remand filed in the Pinney, Farina, Gilliam, Gimpelson, and Naquin actions in this multidistrict litigation was denied.1 I held that federal question jurisdiction supported removal based on the substantial federal question doctrine. In re Wireless Tel. Radio

22-1289 United States v. Johnson In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT AUGUST TERM 2022 No. 22-1289 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RICKEY JOHNSON, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, AKA NEIL DAWN DEFARREN,

113 Wn.2d 869 (1990) 784 P.2d 507 CERTIFICATION FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON IN THE BOEING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, ET AL, Defendants. NORTHWEST STEEL ROLLING MILLS, INC., Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL, Defendants. RSR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL, Defenda