Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. WHOLESALE OUTLET & No. 21-55397 DISTRIBUTION, INC.; TREPCO IMPORTS AND DISTRIBUTION, D.C. No. LTD.; L.A. INTERNATIONAL 2:18-cv-01077- CORPORATION; CALIFORNIA CBM-E WHOLESALE; YNY INTERNATIONAL, INC.; EASHOU, ORDER AND INC., DBA San Diego Cash and AMENDED Carry; SANOOR, INC., DBA L.A.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. WHOLESALE OUTLET & No. 21-55397 DISTRIBUTION, INC.; TREPCO IMPORTS AND DISTRIBUTION, D.C. No. LTD.; L.A. INTERNATIONAL 2:18-cv-01077- CORPORATION; CALIFORNIA CBM-E WHOLESALE; YNY INTERNATIONAL, INC.; EASHOU, INC., DBA San Diego Cash and OPINION Carry; SANOOR, INC., DBA L.A. Top Distributor, P

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN │ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD

Hart v. First Oak Wealth Mgmt., LLC, 2022 NCBC 41. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 21 CVS 15763 STEVEN C. HART, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS FIRST OAK WEALTH TO DISMISS MANAGEMENT, LLC; DWM ADVISORS,

PALMER, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY...273 II. ALLEGED FACTS...275 III. NEGLIGENT ENTRUSTMENT...278 IV. WRONGFUL DEATH AND CUTPA: ISSUES OF STATE LAW...283 A. CUTPA Standing ...285 B. Statute of Limitation

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge. Plaintiffs Domenico De Sole, Eleanore De Sole, and John Howard bring these actions against Defendant Knoedler Gallery, LLC (“Knoedler”); 8-31 Holdings Inc. (“8-31”), Knoedler’s sole member; Michael Hammer, Knoedler’s managing member and the owner , of 831 Holdings, Inc.; Ann Freedman, Knoedler’s former president; Glafira Rosales,

Filed 2/22/18 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TAMMY GUTIERREZ, F073215 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CV283385) v. CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge. In these actions, Plaintiffs claim that paintings that they purchased from Defendant Knoedler Gallery, LLC (“Knoedler”) — on the representation that they had been created by Mark Rothko and Willem de Kooning — were forgeries. In addition to Knoedler, the named defendants include 8-31 Holdings Inc., Knoedler’s sole member; Michael

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: [Regarding New GM’s Partial Motion To Dismiss the Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint] INTRODUCTION .. .391 BACKGROUND .. .392 LEGAL STANDARDS .. .394 DISCUSSION .. .395 A. Brand Devaluation Claims... .395 B. Damages for L

Opinion and Order s JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge This case presents many complex legal issues relating to the approval by popular vote of an amendment to the Charter of the City of Powell, Ohio in November 2014. The Charter Amendment requires that a commission of five prívate citizens be organized to draft a new comprehensive zoning and development plan, which at a minimum would prohibit hig

801 F.Supp.2d 908 (2010) Martin EHRLICH, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals; Plaintiff, v. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC; Defendant. No. CV 10-1151 ABC (PJWx). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. August 11, 2010. *911 David Michael Medby, Gene F. Williams, Mark P. Est

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Nos. 11-11021 & 11-11067 AUG 12, 2011 JOHN LEY

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: *937Plaintiff Authenticom, Inc., a data-integration firm, sued Defendants CDK Global, LLC and The Reynolds and Reynolds Company, the premier purveyors of dealer management systems, for violating Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and committing tortious interference. Both Defendants filed respective motion

ORDER AND REASONS JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (R. Doc. 31) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ Response Memorandum in Opposition (R. Doc. 36). For the following reasons, the Motion to Strike is DENIED and the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. BACKGROUND

735 F.Supp.2d 503 (2010) VINEWOOD CAPITAL, LLC v. SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP, et al. Civil Action No. 4:10-CV-220-Y. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. August 19, 2010. *506 Geoffrey S. Harper, Victor C. Johnson, Fish & Richardson, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff. Robert H. Mow, Jr

MEMORANDUM OPINION C. LYNWOOD SMITH, District Judge. This case is before the court on the motion to remand to state court filed by plaintiff, Mitehell-Hollingsworth Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (“Mitchell-Hollingsworth” or “plaintiff’);1 the motion to dismiss the non-ERISA claims in plaintiffs original complaint filed by defendant Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Michigan (