Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Collis v. Bailey”
Bailey v. Wilsonpublic domain
No. 4-98-0031 Corrected Opinion September 28, 1998 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT MARY J. BAILEY, f/k/a MARY J. HAMMONS, ) Appeal from Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Circuit Court of v. ) Vermilion County
Bailey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardpublic domain
717 A.2d 17 (1998) Louise BAILEY, Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ABEX CORP.), Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 10, 1998. Decided August 12, 1998. *18 Dominic D. Salvatori, Pittsburgh, for petitioner. Michael A. Fetzner, Erie, for respondent. Before COLINS, President Jud
EDWARDS, Circuit Judge. This consolidated appeal concerns two cases involving lawyers. One of them, Getty, was disciplined, and the other, Collis, was disbarred in state proceedings in Kentucky. After exhausting state remedies and having certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court, each filed a civil rights complaint in the United States District Court which was dismi
Bailey Washing Machine Co. v. Youngpublic domain
WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge. In this case an answer has been put in in the names of the three defendants, and as their joint and several answer, but such answer is signed and sworn to by James Young and John E. Young only. This was irregular. The complainant might, if so advised, have accepted the answer, and replied to it, and thereby have waived the irregularity. Freelands v. Royall, 2 Hen. & M. 575. But this was not done. The com
Bailey v. Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co.public domain
Haynes, J. (Orally.) This case comes into this court by petition in error. The original action was brought by Almon Bailey, in the Court of Common Pleas, against the Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Company, to recover for certain injuries received by him, which were caused, as he claimes, by the negligence of defendant company. The facts of the case are substantially these : The firm of She
Bailey v. N. W. Ohio Natural Gas Co.public domain
Haynes, J. (orally). This case comes into this court by petition in error. The original action was brought by Almon Bailey, in the court of common pleas, against the Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Company, to recover for certain injuries received by him, which were caused, as he claims, by the negligence of defendant company. The facts of the case are substantially these: The firm of Sheib
Canal Insurance Co. v. Carpenterpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT, NO. 32] AND DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 31] IRENE M. KEELEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court in this declaratory judgment action are cross-motions for summary judgment. The question presented is whether a flatbed truck owned by the repair shop and driven by James Herrin
Faulk v. Bluittpublic domain
211 S.W.3d 418 (2006) Isaac FAULK & Transit Mix Concrete & Materials Co., Appellants, v. Collie BLUITT, Appellee. No. 10-05-00435-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. November 29, 2006. Rehearing Overruled December 27, 2006. *419 Heather Bailey, New, Haynes & Boone LLP, Dallas, for appellants.
Smith v. Statepublic domain
The defendant was indicted and convicted for the possession of a pistol after having been convicted of a crime of violence (burglary and grand larceny). Alabama Code 1975, Section 13-6-152 (a). Sentence was three years' imprisonment. Four issues are presented on appeal. I Prior to trial, defense counsel made both oral and written motions to limit and exclude any evidence of the burglary of the Imperial Reading building by the defendant's brother, Odell Dennis
Clayton v. Stephenspublic domain
6 F.Supp.2d 480 (1996) Haywood CLAYTON, individually and d/b/a ICMM, Plaintiff, v. Algie STEPHENS, et al., Defendants. No. 5:96-CV-518-BR (1). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. December 10, 1996. *481 Haywood Clayton, Chapel Hill, NC, pro se. John V. Hunter, III, Hunter, Wharton, Stroupe
McGrellis v. Bromwellpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CYNTHIA E. MCGRELLIS, § § Plaintiff Below, § No. 147, 2019 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware JAMES BROMWELL and
Danny Clark v. Arkansas State Board of Healthpublic domain
Cite as 2024 Ark. App. 468 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-22-816 DANNY CLARK Opinion Delivered October 2, 2024 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 18CV-20-155] ARKANSAS STATE BOARD
Ramco Asset Management, LLC v. USA Rare Earth, LLCpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RAMCO ASSET MANAGEMENT, ) LLC, US TRADING COMPANY ) METALS RE, LLC, and DINSHA ) DYNASTY TRUST, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0665-SG ) USA RARE EARTH, LLC, MORZEV
Jacy Gates v. Denise McDonald and Diana Dobbinspublic domain
Opinion filed August 3, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-21-00190-CV __________ JACY GATES, Appellant V. DENISE MCDONALD AND DIANA DOBBINS, Appellees On Appeal from the
State v. Millspublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ) I.D. #1708012318 RYDELL MILLS, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief: DENIED
Brian Glanden v. Kilolo Kijakazipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIAN GLANDEN, No. 22-35632 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- 00292-TOR v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting OPINION Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington T
Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Co. v. Taylorpublic domain
OPINION BARNES, Judge. Case Summary Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Company ("Everett") appeals the trial court's denial of summary judgment in an action filed by Rick and Katrina Taylor. We reverse. Issues The issues we address are: *278I. whether an exclusion in a farm pe
v. Rosspublic domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Lewis v. Smithpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. In this appeal, Thom Lewis challenges the District Court’s judgment dismissing his complaint as barred by res judicata. We will affirm. A brief procedural history of an earlier lawsuit filed by Lewis is germane to the issue in this appeal. Lewis was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Collie Rescue of Central Pennsylvania Inc., a non-
Lewis v. Smithpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT SCIRICA, Chief Judge. In this appeal, Thom Lewis challenges the District Court’s judgment dismissing his complaint as barred by res judicata. We will affirm. A brief procedural history of an earlier lawsuit filed by Lewis is germane to the issue in this appeal. Lewis was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Collie Rescue of Central Pennsylvania Inc., a non-