Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ June 01, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A22A1362. HAROLD MILLER v. KASAY COMBS. This case originated as a suit on account in magistrate court. After the magistrate court found in favor of Kasay Combs, Harold Miller appealed to the superior court. The superior court also found in favor of Combs and affirm

Miller, Judge. Brian Keith Combs pled guilty to one count of burglary (OCGA § 16-7-1 (a) (2011)). Pursuant to the negotiated guilty plea, Combs was sentenced on July 17, 2012, to twenty years, with four to serve in confinement. Combs subsequently filed a pro se motion for a nunc pro tunc order to give him credit for time served in confinement awaiting trial. The trial court denied his motion, and Combs appeals from that order,

OPINION AND ORDER KARL S. FORESTER, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motions of Comair, Inc., et al. (“Comair”) [DE # 539] and Bombardier, Inc. (“Bombardier”) [DE #736] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss claims by various Plain*669tiffs for loss of consortium, pre-impact fear, and hedonic and loss of enjoyment

Opinion of the Court by Chief Justice MINTON. Southern Financial Life Insurance Company sells credit life and disability insurance through lending institutions, mostly banks and car dealerships. In a class action brought against Southern Financial by purchasers of its credit life and disability policies in Kentucky, the trial court entered a discovery order compelling Southern Financial to produce certain lo

OPINION We granted review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining that the appellant (father) in this post-divorce case failed to present evidence of a material change of circumstances justifying a change of custody of the parties' two minor children. The Chancellor granted a change in custody from the appellee (mother) after finding that there was a material change in circumstances that presented a substantial risk of harm to t

COMBS, V.C.J.: 1 The question presented to this Court is whether the trial court properly granted Defendants/Appellees' motion to dismiss the action for failure to state claims upon which relief may be granted, and denied Plaintiff/Appellant's motion for summary judgment. We hold in the affirmative, and affirm the trial court's order. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL H

650 S.E.2d 709 (2007) COMBS v. ATLANTA AUTO AUCTION, INC. No. A07A0514. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 5, 2007. Reconsideration Denied July 31, 2007. *712 Cathey & Strain, Edward E. Strain III, David A. Sleppy, Lisa J. Bucko, Robert Peter Marcovitch, Cornelia, for appellant. Cruser & Mitchell, W

[Cite as State v. Combs, 2025-Ohio-1702.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 14-24-31 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. GREGORY LEE COMBS II, OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

767 F.Supp.2d 758 (2011) LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT E. COMBS, Robert Miller, Carl Novick, Tamara Curton, Heather Janson, Gayle Howard, Matt Strickfaden, and Yvonne Murray, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Case No. 10-14209. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 7, 2011. *759 Scott E

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 05/28/2021 08:10 AM CDT - 587 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports STATE v. COMBS Cite as 308 Neb. 587 State of Nebraska, appel

[Cite as State v. Combs, 2020-Ohio-5397.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLERMONT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2020-01-004 : OPINION - vs -

253 F.Supp.2d 1028 (2003) SIGNATURE COMBS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Nos. 98-CV-2777 D, 98-CV-2968 D, 00-CV-2245 D. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. March 19, 2003. *1029 William E. Norcross, Esq., Norcross Law Firm, Cordova, TN, W. C. Blanton, Thadde

Dunn, J. The question here -presented arises on-¿'motion filed for the purpose of securing an order taxing, as costs in 'favor of plaintiffs in error and against the defendant in error, *2the expense incurred in the preparation of briefs. Counsel for movant proceeds on the theory that, inasmuch as the rules of court require briefs to be printed, the expense incurred is a prop

555 S.E.2d 634 (2001) COMBS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Curtis KENNEDY, Donald Miller, Carolina Environmental Technologies, LLC, and American Sigma, Inc., Defendants. No. COA00-1068. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 4, 2001. *637 Van Hoy, Reutlinger & Adams, by Stephen J. Dunn and Philip M. Van Hoy, for

Opinion of the Court by Judge Miller Affirming. This is a proceeding by Nannie Miller, under section 1689 of tbe Kentucky Statutes, to-secure possession of *547a small tract of land lying on Grape Vine Creek in-Perry County, which she had bought under an execution sale against appellant Granville Combs. The proceeding was begun by noti

February 7, 1908, J. H. Miller filed suit against Ed and Sarah Combs to recover judgment upon a promissory note dated September 17, 1903. Defendant filed answer as follows: "Defendants state: That the supposed promissory note herein sued on in the petition mentioned was for the payment of the right to possession only of a certain tract of land, lying and being in the Choctaw Nation, Indian Territory, more particularly described and known as the 'Sim Casey,' or the old 'Jim Colbert' pla

The question here presented arises on a motion filed for the purpose of securing an order taxing, as costs in favor of plaintiffs in error and against the defendant in error, *Page 2 the expense incurred in the preparation of briefs. Counsel for movant proceeds on the theory that, inasmuch as the rules of court require briefs to be printed, the expense incurred is a proper and legitimate item of costs. Our statute on this subject is contained in section 5

Robert E. Wier, United States District Judge On December 19, 2017, Plaintiff Jack Estep filed this action in Harlan Circuit Court against Steve Combs, a Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFW) officer, alleging various state law claims and a slate of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 violations. DE 1-1 (State Cour

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Concerned that state laws frustrated the formation of “purchasing groups” to serve as intermediaries in the insurance business, *1176Congress enacted the Product Liability Risk Retention Act of 1981, Pub.L. 97-45, 95 Stat. 949, 15 U.S.C. §§ 3901-06. This statute overrides the privilege states otherwise enjoy under the McCarran-Ferguson A

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 10/27/2017 09:13 AM CDT - 422 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 297 Nebraska R eports STATE v. COMBS Cite as 297 Neb. 422 State of Nebraska,