Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Commonwealth Wholesale Corp. v. United States”
Garcia-Garcia v. Costco Wholesale Corp.public domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. After approximately eleven years of working his way up the Costco 1 employment ladder, appellant Leonal Anthony Garcia-Garcia 2 (Garcia) was fired following an investigation which revealed an inventory discrepanc
Marrero v. Costco Wholesale Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Plaintiff Luis Daniel Alicea Marrero (“Plaintiff’) filed a complaint against Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) alleging wrongful termination and damages resulting from unequal treatment, harassment, and discrimination in violation of his constitutional rights. (Docket No. 1-1.) Plaintiff is seeking a severance payment under Puerto Rico’s
498 F.Supp.2d 389 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This document relates to: United States of America ex rel. Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Dey, Inc., et al., Defendant. MDL No. 1456, Master File No. 01-12257-PBS, Civil Action No. 05-11084-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 17, 2007.
*88 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In these cases, Attorneys General from the states of Illinois, Ohio, Florida, Mississippi, Kentucky, Idaho, Pennsylvania and the New York Counties of Oswego, Erie and Schenectady allege that pharmaceutical companies fraudulently inflated drug prices which caus
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Malengpublic domain
522 F.3d 874 (2008) COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norm MALENG, Defendant, Washington Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Defendant-Intervenor, and Roger Hoen; Vera Ing; Merritt D. Long, in their official capacities as members of the Washington State Liquor Control Board, Defendants-Appellants. Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No
498 F.Supp.2d 402 (2007) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates to City of New York et al. v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. Civ. Action No. 04-cv-06054, et al. County of Nassau v. Abbott Laboratories, et al. Civ. Action No. 05-cv-10179. MDL No. 1456, Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.<
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Malengpublic domain
514 F.3d 915 (2008) COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Norm MALENG, Defendant, *916 Washington Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Defendant-Intervenor, and Roger Hoen; Vera Ing; Merritt D. Long, in their official capacities as members of the Washington State Liquor Control Board, Defendants-Appellants. Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Washington corporat
Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.public domain
372 F.Supp.2d 530 (2005) Shirley Rae ELLIS, Leah Horstman, and Elaine Sasaki on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C 043341MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 31, 2005. *531 *532 Bill Lann Lee, Jame
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurancepublic domain
472 F.Supp.2d 1183 (2007) COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 06CV2377IEG(NLS). United States District Court, S.D. California. January 24, 2007. *1184 *1185 *1186 Paul A. Hilding, Hilding Law Firm, Sa
AmeriSource Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BASKIR, Judge. The present matter comes before us for the second time on the Government’s renewed motion to dismiss. AmeriSource Corporation is a wholesale distributor of pharmaceuticals whose products were seized and retained as evidence in criminal proceedings *744against third parties. The Plaintiff, which is not implicated in the crimin
MEMORANDUM OPINION EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge. Plaintiff, the DynaLantic Corporation (“DynaLantic”), is a small business that designs and manufactures aircraft, submarine, ship, and other simulators and training equipment. Plaintiff has brought this suit against Defendants — the Department of Defense (“DoD”), the Department of the Navy (
Frederick Wholesale Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
585 F.Supp. 640 (1983) FREDERICK WHOLESALE CORP., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Court No. 83-1-00074. United States Court of International Trade. December 19, 1983. Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, P.C., New York City (Allan H. Kamnitz and Michelle Benjamin, New York City, on the motion), for plaintiff. Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Wa
Frederick Wholesale Corp. v. The United Statespublic domain
BALDWIN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by Frederick Wholesale Corp. from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 585 F.Supp. 640 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), dismissing Frederick Wholesale’s action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
Costco Wholesale v. Hoenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORM MALENG, Defendant, WASHINGTON BEER & WINE No. 06-35538 WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Intervenor, D.C. No. CV-04-
Costco Wholesale v. Hoenpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORM MALENG, Defendant, WASHINGTON BEER & WINE No. 06-35538 WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Intervenor, D.C. No. CV-04-
LOVERIDGE v. United Statespublic domain
CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-912 Filed: November 26, 2024 PERRY LOVERIDGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Thomas S. Stewart and Reed W. Ripley, Stewart, Wald & Smith, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. Kimberly A. Cullen and LeeAnn Kim, Trial
LOVERIDGE v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-912 Filed: November 26, 2024 PERRY LOVERIDGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Thomas S. Stewart and Reed W. Ripley, Stewart, Wald & Smith, LLC, Kansas City, MO, for Plaintiffs. Kimberly A. Cullen and Leann Kim, Trial Attorneys, David A. Harrington, Assistant Chief, Todd K
Rel: December 15, 2023 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TER
951 N.E.2d 542 (2011) UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor, Inc., Appellants, v. NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 93A02-1006-EX-632. Court of Appeals of Indiana. June 9, 2011. *546 John F. Wickes, Jr., Todd A. Richardson, Joseph P. Rompala, Lewis & Kappes, Indianapolis, IN, At
Commonwealth v. KT&G Corp.public domain
OPINION BY Judge PELLEGRINI. Before this Court are preliminary objections filed by KT&G Corporation (KT&G) in response to a complaint filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by Gerald J. Pappert, Attorney General (the Commonwealth) in which it alleged that KT&G failed to deposit funds in an escrow account for the benefit of the Commonwealth in 2001 and 2002 as required by the Tobacco Settleme