Cases

FELTON, Chief Judge. Pursuant to Code § 19.2-398(0), 1 the Commonwealth appeals an order from the Circuit Court of Fauquier County (“trial court”) sentencing Charles Lordell Jefferson, Jr. (“appellee”) to six years’ incarceration for each of six convictions of production of

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges O’Brien and Causey PUBLISHED Argued at Lexington, Virginia RAYMOND CHARLES BELL OPINION BY v. Record No. 1045-23-3 JUDGE DORIS HENDERSON CAUSEY AUGUST 13, 2024

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Fulton, Ortiz and Senior Judge Petty PUBLISHED Argued at Lexington, Virginia MICHAEL CHARLES HOGLE OPINION BY v. Record No. 0027-22-3 JUDGE WILLIAM G. PETTY

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Petty and Huff Argued at Richmond, Virginia PUBLISHED CHARLES ERSKINE CHURCH OPINION BY v. Record No. 0264-18-2 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER NOVEMBER 12, 2

OPINION BY JUDGE MARY GRACE O’BRIEN Following a jury trial, Charles Stanard Severance (“appellant”) was convicted of two counts of capital murder for the deaths of Ronald Kirby and Ruthanne Lodato, one count of first-degree murder for the death of Nancy Dunning, and other related charges. Prior to trial, appellant moved to sever the charges relating to the D

OPINION BY JUDGE WESLEY G. RUSSELL, JR. Charles Albert Massey, III, appellant, was convicted by a jury of abduction with intent to defile in violation of Code § 18.2-48 and two counts of rape in violation of Code § 18.2-61. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion for a new trial because the Commonwealth failed to timely disclos

HUMPHREYS, Judge. Yvonie Décor Charles (“Charles”) was convicted at a bench trial in the Circuit Court of the City of Chesapeake (“trial court”) of two counts of petit larceny third offense, in violation of Code §§ 18.2-96 and 18.2-104. On appeal, Charles argues that the trial court erred in allowing the Commonwealth to amend the in

ALSTON, Judge. Raymond Charles Case (appellant) appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated in violation of Code § 18.2-266. On appeal, appellant alleges that the trial court (i) “erred in ruling that the Commonwealth proved each and every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt, and specifically that the tria

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Kelsey, Alston and Decker PUBLISHED Argued at Alexandria, Virginia RAYMOND CHARLES CASE OPINION BY v. Record No. 2188-12-4 JUDGE ROSSIE D. ALSTON, JR. FEB

RUSSELL, J. Appellant, Charles Jayson Beck, was convicted in a bench trial of breaking and entering in violation of Code § 18.2-91, grand larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-95, and obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of Code § 18.2-178. 1 On appeal, appellant first argues the evidence is insufficient to prove

ALSTON, Judge. Charles C. Girard (“appellant”) appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the certificate of disposition was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant was a convicted felon. We disagree and affirm the decision of the trial court. Backg

OPINION BY JUDGE WESLEY G. RUSSELL, JR. Manneh Vay, appellant, was convicted, in a jury trial, of rape in violation of Code § 18.2-61, sodomy in violation of Code § 18.2-67.1, and abduction with intent to defile in violation of Code § 18.2-48. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in 1) denying appellant’s motions to strike the evidence of abduction

*491 BEALES, Judge. Claude Davis (appellant) was convicted after a jury trial of one count of burglary with intent to commit larceny under Code § 18.2-91, one count of grand larceny under Code § 18.2-95, one count of attempted arson under Code §§ 18.2-77 and 18.2-26, and one count of violation of a protec

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton and Clements Argued by teleconference CHARLES ALLEN BREEDEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 2272-02-4 JUDGE JEAN HARRISON CLEMENTS JUNE 1, 2004 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PAGE CO

PETTY, Judge. Andrew Wallace entered a conditional guilty plea to one count of indecent liberties with a child in violation of Code § 18.2-370.1. Wallace now appeals the denial of his pretrial motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial. On appeal, Wallace argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss because the Commonwealth failed to bring him to trial wi

OPINION BY JUDGE ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS Crystal Ann Coomer (“Coomer”) appeals the May 24, 2016 decision by the Circuit Court of Lee County (the “trial court”) convicting her of felony child endangerment, in violation of Code § 18.2-371.1(B)(1), a Class 6 felony. Coomer’s single assignment of error is that the trial court erred in finding that she “committed a wi

DECKER, Judge. Lewis Daniel Nimety appeals his 104 convictions for possession of child pornography in violation of Code § 18.2-374.1:1(A). On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred in denying his discovery motions for copies of the images upon which the Commonwealth intended to rely at trial. We hold that the trial court’s rulings permitting the appellant’s attorneys to

KELSEY, Judge. The trial court convicted Alan Neff of being intoxicated in public in violation of Code § 18.2-388, and assault and battery of a police officer in violation of Code § 18.2-57(C). Neff appealed his assault conviction, but not his public-intoxication conviction. He argues on appeal that he had a right to assault the offi

*371 ATLEE, Judge. As a term of Ms probation for various sex crimes, Arthur Zebbs was ordered to complete sex offender treatment. This treatment required Zebbs to admit that he had committed the crimes for which he was on probation. Zebbs refused to make such an admission, and was removed from treatment a

O’BRIEN, Judge. Traer Tisdale (“appellant”) was charged with first-degree murder by lying in wait, in violation of Code § 18.2-32. Prior to trial, the Commonwealth filed a motion to exclude any evidence of appellant’s alleged intoxication at the time of the offense. The trial court granted the motion, and appellant entered a conditional plea of guilty to the murder charge.