Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority v. Union Pacific Railroad Company”
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1445 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dist
Commuter Rail Division of Regional Transportation Authority v. Surface Transportation Boardpublic domain
608 F.3d 24 (2010) COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION OF the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Metra, Petitioner v. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD and United States of America, Respondents. Canadian Pacific Railway Company et al., Intervenors. Nos. 08-1346, 08-1377. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 7, 2010. Decided June 15, 2010.<
Moenning v. Union Pacific Railroad Companypublic domain
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Moenning v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 2012 IL App (1st) 101866 Appellate Court RICHARD C. MOENNING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNION PACIFIC Caption RAILROAD COMPANY, a Utah Corporation, COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION, the Operation Division of the Regional Transportation Authority, and RICHAR
USCA11 Case: 24-11076 Document: 97-1 Date Filed: 08/11/2026 Page: 1 of 93 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-11076 ____________________ FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY LLC,
854 N.E.2d 744 (2006) Tyrone THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The NORTHEAST ILLINOIS REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORPORATION, d/b/a Metra/Metropolitan Rail, and Union Pacific Railroad Company, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-04-3147. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fifth Division. August 18, 2006. *745
Petersen v. Union Pacific Railroadpublic domain
(2008) Marie PETERSEN n/k/a Marie Cimaglia, Special Administrator of the Estate of Jane Ann McGrath, deceased, and Molly Morgan, deceased minor; Jon Petersen as next friend of Katie Petersen, a minor, Steven M. Walters and Gayla J. Walters, Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. 06-3084. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.
163 Cal.App.4th 712 (2008) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; JAMES TUTLNO et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. B200777. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. June 3, 2008. *714 Randolph Cregger & Chalfant, Josep
Bahus v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
MOENNING v. Union Pacific R. Co.public domain
966 N.E.2d 443 (2012) 359 Ill. Dec. 122 Richard C. MOENNING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Utah Corporation, Commuter Rail Division, the Operation Division of the Regional Transportation Authority, and Richard Gladkowski, Defendants, and Norman J. Lerum, Petitioner-Appellee. No. 1-10-1866. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division
Sean Greene v. Long Island Railroad Company, Barbara A. Arias, Thelma Schulman, Metropolitan Transportation Authoritypublic domain
KEARSE, Circuit Judge Defendant Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA” or the “Authority”) appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from an interlocutory order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Leonard D. Wexler, Judge, denying its motion for summary judgment dismissing the personal injury claims asserted against i
Cole v. Chicago Transit Authoritypublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 230797 FIFTH DIVISION March 14, 2025 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT No. 1-23-0797 SHEARAL COLE, as Special Administrator of the Estate of
822 F.Supp. 797 (1991) BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, Defendant, v. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION CO., et al., Joined Counterclaim Defendants. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Co., et al., Intervenors. Civ. A. Nos. 91-1851 (HHG), 91-1861. <
138 F.Supp.2d 189 (2001) Cindy L. BEAUSOLEIL, Administratrix of the Estate of Danielle Beausoleil, Plaintiff, v. MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., Defendants. No. C.A. 98-11503-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 30, 2001. *190 *1
678 F.Supp. 543 (1988) TRANSPORT WORKERS' UNION OF PHILADELPHIA, LOCAL 234 v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. TRANSPORT WORKERS' UNION OF AMERICA LOCAL 2013 v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, DIVISION 71, et al. v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, et al. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, et al. v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANI
OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Circuit Judge. Appellants, the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen and several other unions (the “unions”) representing employees of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) Regional Rail Division, appeal from the order of the district court granting SEPTA’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The order enj
Marsh v. Massachusetts Coastal Railroad LLCpublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13366 CHAD MARSH vs. MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL RAILROAD LLC & another.1 Plymouth
Filed 10/20/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE YERBA BUENA NEIGHBORHOOD CONSORTIUM, LLC, A166091 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Alameda County v. Super. Ct. N
757 F.Supp. 623 (1991) Irving FELTON, v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Civ. A. No. 89-3349. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 19, 1991. *624 *625 Gregory Holston, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Brian Kandell, Francis J. Connell, III and M
In re the Valuation Proceedings Under §§ 303(C) & 306 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973public domain
*653 CNJ Opinion on Interest and Severance Damage Before Friendly, Presiding Judge, and WISDOM and THOMSEN, Judges. FRIENDLY, Presiding Judge: This court filed an opinion on July 12, 1983, CNJ Opinion, 571 F.Supp. 1269, and, on September 20,1983, an opinion on reconsideration, id. at 1335, fixi
Filed 9/20/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE YERBA BUENA NEIGHBORHOOD CONSORTIUM, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, A166091 v. (Alameda County THE REGENTS OF THE Super. Ct. No. RG21090517) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al.,